SIPD at The Intersection of Regional Policy and Capacity: Evaluation of The Implementation of Permendagri 70/2019 at The DPUPR of Banten Province

Authors

  • Dwi Hastuti Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Serang, Indonesia
  • Titi Stiawati Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Serang, Indonesia
  • Riswanda Riswanda Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Serang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i3.6091

Keywords:

SIPD, Permendagri 70/2019, policy evaluation, CIPP model, regional finance

Abstract

The digitalization of regional financial governance in Indonesia requires local governments to adopt integrated information systems to enhance transparency and accountability. Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 70 of 2019 mandates the Regional Government Information System (SIPD) as a unified platform for regional financial management. However, its implementation at technically complex agencies, such as the Banten Province Public Works and Spatial Planning Agency (DPUPR), still faces significant challenges. This study evaluates SIPD implementation using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model through a qualitative descriptive-evaluative approach involving interviews, observations, and document analysis. The findings show that SIPD is contextually well-aligned with regulatory requirements and organizational needs. Nevertheless, limitations persist in human resource capacity, IT infrastructure, system stability, and user competency distribution. Despite these challenges, SIPD has improved data consistency, reporting efficiency, and audit trails. The study concludes that institutional readiness and organizational adaptability are more critical to SIPD success than technological factors alone, highlighting the need for capacity building, infrastructure improvement, and strengthened inter-unit coordination.

References

Adila, A., & Dahtiah, D. (2022). Model evaluasi program pemerintah.

Aulia, A., et al. (2022). Evaluasi model CIPP dalam sistem pendidikan.

Damanik, F. (2025). Integrasi Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dalam sistem informasi publik di Indonesia [Tesis Magister, Universitas Sumatera Utara].

Daryanto, A. (2022). Penerapan model evaluasi CIPP pada kebijakan publik di pemerintahan daerah [Tesis Magister, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta].

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Dewi, R. (2022). Analisis tahapan evaluasi kebijakan publik dalam implementasi reformasi birokrasi [Tesis Magister, Universitas Padjadjaran].

Dilapanga, F., & Rantung, S. (2022). Monitoring dan evaluasi kebijakan publik [Tesis Magister, Universitas Sam Ratulangi].

Djalante, R. (2022). Adaptive governance dalam ketahanan pemerintahan.

Dunn, W. N. (2024). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach (8th ed.). Routledge.

Folke, C. (2022). Adaptive governance theory.

Hatfield-Dodds, S. (2007). Adaptive governance dalam common-pool resources.

Jannah, N. (2024). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi penerimaan SIPD di pemerintah daerah [Tesis Magister, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta].

Julianto, H., & Fitriah, N. (2022). Evaluasi hasil program digitalisasi pemerintah daerah menggunakan model CIPP [Tesis Magister, Universitas Negeri Surabaya].

Karpouzoglou, T., Dewulf, A., & Clark, J. (2016). Adaptive governance and innovation.

Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 70 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Informasi Pemerintahan Daerah.

Mazmanian, D., & Sabatier, P. (1980). Implementation and public policy. Scott Foresman.

Nasution, M. I., & Nurwani. (2021). Analisis penerapan SIPD pada BPKAD Kota Medan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan.

Nugraha, R. (2024). Evaluasi kebijakan publik di era digital dan transformasi sistem informasi daerah [Tesis Magister, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa].

Patton, M. Q. (2020). Utilization-focused evaluation (5th ed.). Sage.

Permatasari. (2022). Evaluasi kebijakan: Tahapan akhir dalam siklus kebijakan publik.

Prabowo. (2022). Evaluasi kebijakan publik.

Pribadi, U. (2022). Inovasi dalam pemerintahan.

Riswanda. (2023). Menerapkan literasi kebijakan publik: Seri tembakau, narkoba, pornografi dan perdagangan orang. Madza Media.

Riswanda. (2024a). Nalar kebijakan: Bernalar kritis dalam sebuah dialektika kebijakan. CV Sintesia.

Riswanda. (2024b). Menafsirkan paradigma penelitian kebijakan publik. CV Sintesia.

Ritonga, R., dkk. (2022). Model evaluasi kebijakan.

Sari, D. R. K., Maelani, P., & Susilawati, D. (2025). Kinerja organisasi: SIPD, komitmen organisasi, dan pengendalian internal (studi pada Bappeda Kota Serang). Account Journal, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta.

Septiani, I., & Isnawaty, N. W. (2024). Efektivitas SIPD dalam pengelolaan keuangan daerah di DPRD Provinsi Jawa Barat. Responsive Journal.

Setyaningrum, L. (2022). Pengembangan indikator evaluasi kinerja dalam kebijakan publik [Tesis Magister, Universitas Indonesia].

Simral Kuarta. (2020). Sistem informasi keuangan daerah Provinsi Banten.

Sistem Informasi Pemerintahan Daerah (SIPD) Kemendagri. (2023). Dokumen sistem informasi pemerintahan daerah.

Sunaryanto, B. (2025). Integrasi TAM dan Theory of Planned Behavior dalam implementasi sistem informasi pemerintahan [Tesis Magister, Universitas Diponegoro].

Susanty. (2022). Model evaluasi Kirkpatrick dan ROI.

Van Assche, K., Valentinov, V., & Verschraegen, G. (2022). Adaptive governance and public policy.

Vitriana, N., Agustiawan, & Ahyaruddin, M. (2022). Analisis penerapan SIPD pada BPKAD Kota Pekanbaru. Digital Business Journal.

Zakaria, A. (2023). Implementasi Permendagri Nomor 70 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Informasi Pemerintahan Daerah (SIPD) dalam pengelolaan keuangan daerah di Kabupaten Aceh Tenggara [Tesis Magister, Universitas Sumatera Utara].

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Hastuti, D., Stiawati, T., & Riswanda, R. (2026). SIPD at The Intersection of Regional Policy and Capacity: Evaluation of The Implementation of Permendagri 70/2019 at The DPUPR of Banten Province. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 7(3), 3248–3253. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i3.6091

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (February - March 2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Hastuti, Titi Stiawati, Riswanda Riswanda

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).