Training human resources to meet job positions in enterprises in the digital transformation period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i6.4806Keywords:
Digital transformation, Human resource training, University–enterprise cooperation, Graduate competencies, Industry 4.0Abstract
In the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and rapid digital transformation, the need to align university training with enterprise job requirements has become increasingly urgent. Despite improvements in higher education in Vietnam, a significant gap remains between the competencies of graduates and the evolving expectations of employers. This study aims to develop a validated competency framework to assess the ability of university graduates to meet job positions in enterprises during the digital transformation period. The research integrates both theoretical models and empirical evidence, applying the ASK (Attitudes, Skills, Knowledge) competency framework and the CDIO (Conceive–Design–Implement–Operate) educational approach. Using a mixed-methods design, including expert consultation, in-depth interviews, and quantitative analysis with Cronbach's Alpha, EFA, CFA, and SEM, the study establishes a six-factor model. The model includes: (1) trained knowledge, (2) creative thinking ability, (3) professional skills, (4) communication and teamwork skills, (5) professional autonomy, and (6) ethics and responsibility. The empirical findings confirm that these factors are reliable and valid indicators of job readiness. The study also highlights the importance of university–enterprise collaboration in curriculum design, experiential learning, and resource sharing to enhance graduates' adaptability to digital technologies such as AI, IoT, and Big Data. The research contributes a scientifically grounded tool for measuring competency alignment with labor market demands and offers practical implications for higher education institutions aiming to modernize training programs. Ultimately, the study provides a foundation for universities to reform education in response to the demands of Industry 4.0 and the digital economy, thereby improving employability and sustainable workforce development.
References
Barker, R. (2016). Working with Universities-CEO'S perspective: Bringing science into industry from Universities. Research Management, 28(6), 22–24.
Becker, W. E, & Lewis, D. R. (1992). The Economics of American Higher Education. Netherlands: Springer.
Bloom, B. S. (1982). The role of gifts and markers in the development of talent. Exceptional Children, 48(6), 510–522.
Carter, S., & Yeo, A. C.-M. (2017). Undergraduate perceptions of the knowledge, skills and competencies required of today’s practicing marketer. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 7(3), 240–260. doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-12-2016-0084
Colton, R. M. (2016). Working with universities: Status report on the NSF University/Industry Cooperative Research Centers. Research Management, 28(6), 25–31.
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., & Brodeur, D. R. (2009). Rethinking Engineering Education. Springer
Do Khac Thanh, & Hoang Cong Kien. (2020). University-Enterprise Cooperation: Solutions to improve training quality at Hung Vuong University. Journal of Science and Technology, 20(3), 36–44.
Elmuti, D., Abebe, M., & Nicolosi, M. (2005). An overview of strategic alliances between universities and corporations. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1), 115–28.
Etzkowitz, H. (1993). Technology transfer: The second academic revolution. Technology Access Report, 6, 7–9. doi: /10.1017/CBO9781139046930.004.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple Helix -- University - Industry - Government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19.
Forsyth, J., & Cowap, L. (2017). In-house, university-based work experience vs off-campus work experience. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 7(3), 229–239.
Geisler, E., & Rubenstein, A. H. (1989). University Industry Relations: A Review of Major Issues. In A. N. Link, & G. Tassey (Eds.), Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry - University - Government Relationship (pp. 43–62). Springer Netherlands.
Hang, N. T., & Huan, N. V. (2020). Evaluation of the Ability to Respond the Job Placement of Students to Enterprises during Integration 4.0. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 16, 250–259. doi: 10.37394/232015.2020.16.26
Helyer, R. (2011). Higher education, skills and work-based learning. The Journal of the University Vocational Awards Council, 7(3), 15–27.
Howells, J. (1986). Industry-academic links in research and innovation: A national and regional development perspective. Regional Studies, 20, 472–476.
Inzelt, A. (2004). The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 975–995.
Koschatzky, K., & Stahlecker, T. (2010). New forms of strategic reseach collaboration between firms and universities in the Germen research systerm. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization, 9, 94–110. doi: 10.1504/IJTTC.2010.029427
Martin, M. (2000). Managing University-Industry Relations: A Study of Institutional Practices from 12 Different Countries. Retrieved from https://aau.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/9/2018/04/Managing-University-Industry-Relations.pdf
Martino, J. (1996). The role of University Research Institutes in technology transfer. Industry and Higher Education, 10(5), 316–320.
Mitev, N., & Venters, W. (2009). Reflexive evaluation of an academic–industry research collaboration: Can mode 2 management research be achieved?. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 733–754. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00846.x
Nguyen Chu Du, & Nguyen Thuy Dung. (2019). Linking intellectual property training between universities, colleges and enterprises in Vietnam in the 4.0 Revolution. Journal of Management Science and Technology, 11, 35–44.
Nguyen Huu Hao, & Nguyen Thi My Dieu. (2016). The quality of Vietnamese human resources in the context of integration into the ASEAN economic community: current situation and solutions. Journal of Science and Technology, Tra Vinh University, 21, 10–16.
Nguyen Thi Hang. (2021a). Optimizing the transaction with customers directions to digital transformation for enterprises. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(11), 5676–5680.
Nguyen Thi Hang. (2021b). Universal education development to enhance the quality of human resources in the context of digital transformation and industrial revolution 4.0. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, 21(1), 88–95.
Nguyen Thi Hang. (2021c). Digital Education to improve the Quality of Human Resources Implementing Digital Transformation in the Context of Industrial Revolution 4.0. Management, Innovation and Technologies, 11(2), 312–323.
Nguyen Thu Thuy. (2020). Research and proposed solutions to improve the quality of Vietnamese human resources in the market mechanism. Science and technology tasks under the National Education Science Program chaired by Foreign Trade University, KHGD/16-20. DT.019
Nguyen Viet Ha. (2018). The relationship between universities and enterprises in research, technology transfer and the application of the Triple Helix model to promote this relationship in Vietnam. Hue University Journal of Science: Economics and Development, 127(5A), 119–131. doi: 10.26459/hueunijed.v127i5A.5030
Pham Thi Thuy Trang, Bui Thi Thuy, Nguyen Thi Thu Thuy, & Hoang Trong Hung. (2019). Promoting linkage activities between schools and enterprises: a case study at the University of Economics, Hue University. Journal of Science, Hue University: Economics and Development, 128(5A), 79–91.
Rothwell, W. J., & Lindholm, J. E. (1999). Competency identification modeling and assessment in the USA. International Journal of Training and Development, 3(2), 90–105.
Santoro, M. (2000). Success breeds success: The linkage betweenrelationship intensity and tangible outcomes in university industry collaborative ventures. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(2), 255–273.
Scott, N. (1998). Strategy for activating university research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 57(3), 217–219.
Todeva, E., & Knoke, D. (2005). Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Journal Management Decision, 43(1), 123–148.
Wheelahan, L. (2009). The problem with CBT (and why constructivism makes things worse). Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 227–242. doi: 10.1080/13639080902957913
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bui Dang Trinh, Le Thi Minh Hoa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).
