The Equality of Material and Non-Material Culture in Reconstructing Muarajambi Temple as Center of Education

Authors

  • Fitriaty Fitriaty Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Asyhadi Mufsi Sadzali University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Amir Husni Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Ade Octavia Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i4.4156

Keywords:

Symmetrical archaeology, identity, material culture, Non-Material

Abstract

Archaeological research in various parts of Indonesia has helped the construction of local and national identities as a unifying narrative of the nation. The results of archaeological research on the Srivijaya Kingdoms have been used as a historical basis for building Indonesia's identity as a maritime and agrarian nation spread across the archipelago. Archaeological research has grown rapidly since the 1800s and focuses on material culture such as artifacts and features without seeing other non-material objects around them. This paradigm produces a limited narrative that only views humans as the solo actors in the process of cultural formation in civilization, while non-material objects such as the natural environment have been marginalized from the process of identity reconstruction. This phenomenon raises the question of what approach can accommodate material and non-material culture used in one whole perspective in reconstructing identity. This article is theoretical with a desk study of Witmore's thoughts. From the review, it is known that the symmetrical archaeology approach places material and non-material culture as equal data in interpreting the past which produces a more in-depth narrative with various perspectives. Symmetrical archaeology is also able to see the role of non-material culture such as the environment, and thought as active actors in the process of cultural formation. Symmetrical archaeology bridges the connectivity between identities in comprehensive narrative.

References

Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery (second, Vol. 2). The University of Chicago Press.

Dyson, S. L. (1993). From New to New Age Archaeology: Archaeological Theory and Classical Archaeology-A 1990s Perspective. American Journal of Archaeology, 97(2), 195–206.

Greene, K. T. M. (2010). Archaeology: An Introduction, Fifth edition (fifth, Vol. 5).

Hodder, I. (1985). Postprocessual Archaeology. In Springer (Vol. 8). Academic Press.

Hodder, I. (1991). Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role. Source: American Antiquity, 56(1), 7–18. https://about.jstor.org/terms

Hodder, I. (2007). The “Social” in Archaeological Theory: An Historical and Contemporary Perspective. In A Companion to Social Archaeology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–415). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470693605.fmatter

K. R. Dark. (1995). Theoretical Archaeology.

Magetsari, N. (2011). Museum di Era Pascamodern. Seminar Towards Indonesian Postmodern Museums, 1–14. https://museumku.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/noerhadi-magetsari-museum-di-era-pascamodern.pdf

Magetsari, N. (2016). Perspektif arkeologi masa kini dalam konteks Indonesia (A. Akbar & I. Marwoti, Eds.; 1st ed., Vol. 1). Kompas.

Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, D. (1992). 50 Tahun Lembaga Purbakala dan Peninggalan Nasional 1913-1963. In 1 (R.P Soejono, Vol. 1, pp. 1–1992).

Sadzali, A. M. (2019). Hulu Ke Hilir: Jaringan Dan Sistem Perniagaan Sungai Kerajaan Srivijaya. Paradigma, Jurnal Kajian Budaya, 9(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.17510/paradigma.v9i1.276

Sadzali, A. M. (2020). Identifikasi Arkeologi Sarana dan Prasarana Mahavihara Muarajambi Sebagai Pusat Pendidikan di Asia Tenggara Pada Masa Melayu Kuno. Arkeologi Papua, 12(2), 133–151.

Sadzali, A. M. (2022). Karakteristik Arsitektur Percandian Masa Klasik Di DAS Batanghari. Titian?: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora, 06(1), 80–94.

Schiffer, M. B. (1985). Advances in archaeological method and theory. Volume 8. Academic Press.

Shacke, P. A., & Little, B. J. (1992). Post-Processual Approaches to Meanings and Uses of Material Culture in Historical Archaeology”, . Historical Archaeology, 26(3), 5–11.

Shanks, M. (2007). Symmetrical Archaeology. World Archaeology, 39(1), 589–596. www.academia.edu/1234484/Archaeology_The_discipline_of_things

Soejono, R. P. (1987). Archaeological Research in Indonesia. In Source: Journal of Southeast Asian Studies (Vol. 18, Issue 2).

Tanudirjo, D. A. (1995). Theoritical trends in Indonesia archaeology. In P. J. Ucko (Ed.), Theory In Archaeology A World Perspective (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 62–74). Routledge. http://www.historiayarqueologia.com/group/library

Utomo, B. B. (1994). Swarnadwipa Abad XIII-XIV Masehi Penggunaan Atas Sumber Emas di Hulu Batanghari (Sumatra Barat). Berkala Arkeologi, 14(2), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v14i2.728

Utomo, B. B. (2016). Persinggahan Terakhir: Rumah Peradaban Sriwijaya di Muarojambi.

Witmore, C. (2007). Symmetrical archaeology: Excerpts of a manifesto. World Archaeology, 39(4), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240701679411

Witmore, C. (2018). Symmetrical Archaeology. In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–16). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.s

Downloads

Published

2025-04-10

How to Cite

Fitriaty, F., Sadzali, A. M. ., Husni, A. ., & Octavia, A. . (2025). The Equality of Material and Non-Material Culture in Reconstructing Muarajambi Temple as Center of Education. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 6(4), 2700–2709. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i4.4156