Employee Well-Being as a Strategic HRM Driver of Competitive Advantage in Higher Education

Authors

  • Anita Novialumi Bina Insani University, Bekasi, Indonesia
  • Supardi Supardi Bina Insani University, Bekasi, Indonesia
  • Sardi Efendi STIES Mitra Karya, Bekasi, Indonesia
  • Luthvi Rachman Ervianto Bina Insani University, Bekasi, Indonesia
  • Adrianus Trigunadi Bina Insani University, Bekasi, Indonesia
  • Febrisi Dwita Bina Insani University, Bekasi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i6.6580

Keywords:

Human Resource Management, Employee Well-being, Quality Improvement, Organizational Performance, Competitive Advantage

Abstract

This study examines how organizational performance and quality improvement influence competitive advantage through employee well-being in higher education institutions. A quantitative method was used, drawing on survey data gathered from 200 academic and administrative personnel at private universities located in the Bekasi area of Indonesia. The analysis was conducted utilizing Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The findings reveal that organizational effectiveness as well as improvement in quality have a notable impact on competitive edge, both in direct and indirect ways, with the well-being of employees serving as a crucial mediating factor. Furthermore, organizational performance and quality improvement significantly enhance employee well-being, which in turn strengthens institutional competitiveness. This research adds to the literature on strategic human resource management by framing employee welfare as an essential tool that transforms organizational strengths into a lasting competitive edge, thus broadening the Resource-Based View (RBV). The findings emphasize the significance of combining quality enhancement, performance management, and employee well-being strategies to enhance institutional effectiveness and long-term competitiveness in higher education.

References

Bakker, A. B. … Sanz-vergel, A. (2023). Job Demands – Resources Theory : Ten Years Later. 25–53.

Barney, J. B. … Wright, M. (2021). Resource-Based Theory and the Value Creation Framework. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1936–1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211021655

Boxall, K. … Nagler, T. (2022). Seasonal land-ice-flow variability in the Antarctic Peninsula. 3907–3932.

Collins, C. J. (2022). Expanding the resource-based view model of strategic human resource management. In Strategic human resource management and organizational effectiveness. Routledge.

Festing, M., & Schäfer, L. (2022). Talent and Talent Management in Ambidextrous Organizations: Framework and Research Agenda Addressing the Challenges of Complexity and Dynamism. In D. Collings … H. Scullion (Eds.), Talent Management: A Decade of Developments (pp. 147–176). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-834-120221008

Haan, J., & Gallagher, C. (2022). Situating Linguistically Responsive Instruction in Higher Education Contexts: Foundations for Pedagogical, Curricular, and Institutional Support. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1).

Hair, J. F. … Sarstedt, M. (2017). Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107.

Jung, H. S. … Yoon, H. H. (2023). Impact of Hotel Employees’ Psychological Well-Being on Job Satisfaction and Pro-Social Service Behavior: Moderating Effect of Work–Life Balance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511687

Langlois, T. … Harvey, E. S. (2020). PR ACTUAL TOOLS A field and video annotation guide for baited remote underwater stereo-video surveys of demersal fish assemblages. 2020(June), 1401–1409. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13470

Mazzarol, & Reboud, S. (2019). Planning, business models, and strategy. In Entrepreneurship and innovation: theory, practice and context (pp. 191-225). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

OECD. (2023). Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem.

Rahmadani, V. G. … Osin, E. N. (2019). Basic psychological need satisfaction mediates the relationship between engaging leadership and work engagement: A cross-national study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(4), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21366

Sukoco, B. M. … Daryanto, A. (2022). Organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-11-2020-0428

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023 : technology in education: a tool on whose terms? https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4020460?v=pdf

Van De Voorde, Paauwe, & Van Veldhoven, M. (2012). Employee well‐being and the HRM–organizational performance relationship: a review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 391–407.

Van Nguyen, T. A. … Tucek, D. (2023). Total Quality Management 4.0 Framework: Present and Future. Operations and Supply Chain Management, 16(3), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0540391

Wang, Y. … Zhao, Y. (2023). Academic performance under COVID-19: The role of online learning readiness and emotional competence. Current Psychology, 42(34), 30562–30575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02699-7

Wei, Y. … Wei, G. (2020). The impact of employee welfare on innovation performance: Evidence from China’s manufacturing corporations. International Journal of Production Economics, 228(March), 107753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107753

Downloads

Published

2026-09-14

How to Cite

Novialumi, A., Supardi, S., Efendi, S., Ervianto, L. R., Trigunadi, A., & Dwita, F. (2026). Employee Well-Being as a Strategic HRM Driver of Competitive Advantage in Higher Education. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 7(6), 5662–5675. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i6.6580