The Driving Factors of Passenger Loyalty on the Jabodetabek Commuter Line Train: A Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i2.5699Keywords:
Loyalty, Satisfaction, Behavior, Public Transport, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)Abstract
This study aims to analyze the factors that influence the loyalty of Jabodetabek Commuter Line (KRL) passengers, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) perspective. This study focuses on the influence of attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioral control, and satisfaction on the intention to be loyal to KRL. The method used in this study is quantitative, employing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using Smart PLS software to measure the relationships between latent variables and related indicators. The results of the study indicate that the factors influencing KRL user loyalty are social norms, including influences from family, friends, and superiors. Behavioral control also has a significant influence, particularly regarding availability, travel time, and punctuality. Although positive attitudes toward the KRL do not directly influence loyalty, positive user experiences related to service quality, such as comfort and safety, play a significant role in enhancing loyalty. User satisfaction with KRL services was also found to have a positive effect on the intention to be loyal, highlighting the importance of improving service quality in maintaining and enhancing satisfaction. This study suggests improving service quality, enhancing mode integration, and providing incentives to boost passenger loyalty, as well as strengthening social norms that support the use of public transportation. These findings contribute to transportation planning in densely populated urban areas like Jabodetabek to achieve sustainable transportation systems.
References
Adhikari, K., & Poudyal, L. (2023). Future of Construction Industry: COVID-19 and Its Implications on Construction Projects and Risk Management—A Review. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 13(7).
Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Action: A Theory of Planned Behavior. Springer-Verlag.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Allen, J., Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2020). Effect of critical incidents on public transport satisfaction and loyalty: an Ordinal Probit SEM-MIMIC approach. Transportation, 47(2), 827–863.
Allen, J., Muñoz, J. C., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2019). Understanding public transport satisfaction: Using Maslow’s hierarchy of (transit) needs. Transport Policy, 81, 75–94.
Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. In Journal of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 23).
Borhan, M. N., Ibrahim, A. N. H., & Miskeen, M. A. A. (2019). Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external influence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 130, 373–384.
Central Statistics Agency. (2024). Statistik Komuter Jabodetabek 2023. Jakarta: Central Statistics Agency.
Chang, Y. H., & Yeh, C. H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty in intercity bus services. Transport Policy, 59, 38–45.
Cochran. (1977). Sampling Techniques (Vol. 3). John Wiley & Sons.
Dahim, M. (2021). Enhancing the development of sustainable modes of transportation in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities. Civ Eng J, 7(12), 2030-2042.
Dharmawan, H. (2022). Hubungan Antara Integrasi Layanan Paratransit Terhadap Jumlah Pengguna Bus Rapid Transit: Studi Kasus Mikrotrans Transjakarta. Jurnal Transportasi Multimoda, 20(1), 19-25.
Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2021). Customer Satisfaction as a Measure of Service Quality in Public Transport Planning. International Encyclopedia of Transportation, 1-7(6), 220–224.
Efendi, A. I., Deli Imanuel Dudung, S., & Sudriyanto, E. (2024). Faktor yang mempengaruhi kepuasan dan loyalitas pengguna angkutan umum menggunakan pemodelan partial least squares (PLS-SEM). Jurnal Penelitian Sekolah Tinggi Transportasi Darat, 14(2), 96–107.
European Environment Agency. (2022). Environmental statement 2021. Publications Office of the European Union.
Fauziawati, R., Rifai, A. I., & Handayani, S. (2022). Passengers Satisfaction Analysis of Quality and Schedule of Commuter Line Service: A Case Citayam-Tebet Route. Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 5(2), 833–842.
Ge, W., Sheng, G., & Zhang, H. (2020). How to Solve the Social Norm Conflict Dilemma of Green Consumption: The Moderating Effect of Self-Affirmation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482.
Grotenhuis, J. W., Wiegmans, B. W., & Rietveld, P. (2007). The desired quality of integrated multimodal travel information in public transport: Customer needs for time and effort savings. Transport policy, 14(1), 27-38.
Hrelja, R., Khan, J., & Pettersson, F. (2020). How to create efficient public transport systems? A systematic review of critical problems and approaches for addressing the problems. Transport Policy, 98, 186-196.
Jenelius, E., & Mattsson, L. G. (2021). Resilience of Transport Systems. International Encyclopedia of Transportation, 1-7(7), 258–267.
Lai, W. T., & Chen, C. F. (2011). Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers-The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement. Transport Policy, 18(2), 318–325.
Liu, S. S., Morris, M. W., Talhelm, T., & Yang, Q. (2019). Ingroup vigilance in collectivistic cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(29), 14538–14547.
Munaf, A. I., Rachmarwi, W., Setiorini, A., & Nurfadilah, D. (2020). Motivation to Use Private Transportation: Case Study in Jabodetabek. Maker: Jurnal Manajemen, 6(2), 175–186.
Nguyen-Phuoc, D. Q., Phuong Tran, A. T., Nguyen, T. Van, Le, P. T., & Su, D. N. (2021). Investigating the complexity of perceived service quality and perceived safety and security in building loyalty among bus passengers in Vietnam – A PLS-SEM approach. Transport Policy, 101, 162–173.
Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. St Martin’s Press.
Onyeka, A. C., Izunobi, C. H., & Iwueze, I. S. (2015). Estimation of Population Ratio in Post-Stratified Sampling Using Variable Transformation. Open Journal of Statistics, 05(01), 1–9.
Silveira, T. C. dos R., Romano, C. A., & Gadda, T. M. C. (2021). Loyalty and public transit: a quantitative systematic review of the literature. Transport Reviews, 42(3), 362–383
Su, D. N., Nguyen-Phuoc, D. Q., & Johnson, L. W. (2021). Effects of perceived safety, involvement and perceived service quality on loyalty intention among ride-sourcing passengers. Transportation, 48(1), 369–393.
Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). Menentukan Populasi dan Sampel: Pendekatan Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(4), 2721–2731.
Thøgersen, J. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 247–261.
Tyrinopoulos, Y., & Antoniou, C. (2008). Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications. Transport Policy, 15(4), 260–272.
Tyrinopoulos, Y., & Antoniou, C. (2013). Factors affecting modal choice in urban mobility. European Transport Research Review, 5(1), 27–39.
Van Lierop, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2016). Enjoying loyalty: The relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Research in Transportation Economics, 59, 50–59.
Van Lierop, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2018). Is having a positive image of public transit associated with travel satisfaction and continued transit usage? An exploratory study of bus transit. Public Transport, 10(2), 241–256.
Van Lierop, D., Badami, M. G., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2018). What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature. Transport Reviews, 38(1), 52–72.
Wahyudiarto, F., Arief, M., & Alfiansyah, R. (2025). Determinants of User Satisfaction and Loyalty in Jakarta's Light Rail Transit (LRT). Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(1), 1–11.
Wang, X., Li, C., Chen, Y., Zheng, C., Zhang, F., Huang, Y., & Birch, S. (2022). Relationships between job satisfaction, organizational commitment, burnout and job performance of healthcare professionals in a district-level health care system of Shenzhen, China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 992258.
Webb, V., Zhao, J., & Veneziano, D. (2010). Customer Loyalty in the Public Transportation Context Chairman, Departmental Committee for Graduate Students [Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/58083
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wedi Hendra, Djamal Subastian, Siti Maemunah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).
