Digital Transformation of Minutes Preparation and Sessions Management through the Minutes Information System (SIRIH) of the Indonesian House of Representatives in 2025

Authors

  • Muhamad Aaqil Imama Krisnadwipayana University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Budi Supriyatno Krisnadwipayana University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Aziz Hakim Krisnadwipayana University, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijms.v7i3.6186

Keywords:

Digital Transformation, Digital Government, SPBE, SIRIH, DPR RI

Abstract

The digital transformation of public institutions demands the integration of policy, governance, technology, and user behavior to generate public value. This qualitative study analyzes the implementation of the DPR RI Minutes Information System (SIRIH) at the DPR RI Secretariat General through a multi-level approach. At the macro level, the OECD Digital Government Policy Framework is used to assess digital governance maturity. At the meso level, a socio-technical system approach is used to analyze the integration of SPBE policies, organizational design, and court proceedings. At the micro level, the UTAUT model is used to explain the factors of system adoption and utilization by officials. Data were obtained through analysis of official documents and observation of work processes. The results show that at the macro level, SIRIH strengthens the efficiency, transparency, and accountability of court proceedings. At the meso level, SIRIH implementation encourages standardization of work processes and cross-unit coordination, but still faces limitations in system integration and alignment of technology design with organizational needs. At the micro level, performance expectancy and social influence are the main determinants of adoption, with challenges in digital literacy and interface quality. This study confirms that digital transformation of court proceedings is a multi-layered socio-technical process that requires simultaneous strengthening of policy, organizational design, and user capacity.

Author Biography

Budi Supriyatno, Krisnadwipayana University, Jakarta, Indonesia

Professor - Universitas Krisnadwipayana

References

Session Bureau I, Secretariat General of the Indonesian House of Representatives. (2025). DPR RI SIRIH Proposal: Public Service Innovation in 2025

Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17–32.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). Sage.

Denhardt, R.B., & Denhardt, J.V. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government. Oxford University Press.

Heeks, R. (2022). Digital transformation of public services. London: Routledge.

Heeks, R. (2022). Digital government for development: Concepts, frameworks and practices. University of Manchester.

Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69 (1), 3–19. https ://doi.org/10.1111/j.146 7 -9299 . 1991.tb00779.x

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69 (1), 3–19.

Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform. (2020). Roadmap for bureaucratic reform 2020–2024. KemenPANRB.

Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform. (2022). Guidelines for Evaluating Electronic-Based Government Systems. Jakarta: KemenPANRB.

Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform. (2018). Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 95 of 2018 concerning Electronic-Based Government Systems. Jakarta: KemenPANRB.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Recommendations from the Council on Digital Government Strategies. Paris: OECD Publishing

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2020). Digital Government Index 2019: Results and key findings. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019). Digital government review of Indonesia: Towards digital transformation of the public sector. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 95 of 2018 concerning Electronic-Based Government Systems

Rahmadi, MH, & Rusmiati, ET (2025). Digital transformation of human resource management in government agencies: Adaptation, challenges, and opportunities. Petanda: Journal of Communication and Humanities Studies.

Renanda, AA, & Rosidin, A. (2025). The effectiveness of digital services in simplifying bureaucracy and public data management. Journal of Multidisciplinary National Research, 1(8). https://doi.org/10.59837/jpnmb.v1i8.310

Secretariat General of the Indonesian House of Representatives. (2024). Performance Report of the Secretariat General of the Indonesian House of Representatives in 2024.

Secretariat General of the Indonesian House of Representatives. (2024). Report on the implementation of the SPBE evaluation in 2024.

Secretariat General of the Indonesian House of Representatives. (2020). Strategic Plan of the Secretariat General of the Indonesian House of Representatives 2020–2024.

Suhartono, B., Rivai, FH, & Wibowo, E. (2025). Implementation of e-government in public services at the Ministry of Home Affairs' administrative service unit. Journal of Apparatus Resources.

United Nations. (2022). United Nations E-Government Survey 2022: The future of digital government. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA).

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–478.

Published

2026-02-06

How to Cite

Imama, M. A., Supriyatno, B., & Hakim, A. (2026). Digital Transformation of Minutes Preparation and Sessions Management through the Minutes Information System (SIRIH) of the Indonesian House of Representatives in 2025. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 7(3), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijms.v7i3.6186

Most read articles by the same author(s)