WORK SATISFACTION VALUE VIEWED FROM REACTION OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP, PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING VARIABLES

Authors

  • Aji Peri Sandria Mercu Buana University, Jakarta
  • Irfan Noviandy Aulia Mercu Buana University, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v2i1.516

Keywords:

Transformational leadership, performance assessment, work satisfaction and training.

Abstract

This research was done because wants to explore regarding those influence which come from transformational leadership, performance assessment and training against work satisfaction at PT Pelat Timah NusantaraTbk in Cilegon. This research has include in qualitative research by causality design to prove those causal relationship between several variables such as transformational leadership (X1), performance assessment (X2), training (X3) and work satisfaction (Y). samples used which amounted to 99 people with sampling technique used non probality sampling and sample selected was done by random sampling. Scores of statements on questionnaire used a Likert scale of 1-5. Data analysis used SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) or Structural Equation Model whereas data processed by Partial Least Square (Smart-PLS) version 3.0. These results from research could be defined as follows: transformational leadership has mutual reaction to work satisfaction, performance assessment has beneficial impact over work satisfaction, training has positive influence towards work satisfaction and transformational leadership, performance assessment and training simultaneously influence on work satisfaction at PT Pelat Timah NusantaraTbk in Cilegon.

References

Burham Bungin, (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial & Ekonomi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
Elmi Farida, (2018). Telisik Manajemen Sumber daya Manusia. Ed 1. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Ghozali, Imam. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif Dengan Partial Least Squares. Ed 4. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Luthans, Fred. (2011). Organizasional Behavior. Ed 12. New York : Mc Grow-Hill Irwin.
Mehmet Salih Gençera , Assist. Prof. Dr. Yavuz Samurb. (2016). Leadership Styles and Technology: Leadership Competency Level of Educational Leaders. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 229 pp 226 – 233.
Muslichah, Sobikhul Asrori. (2018). The Effect of Transformational Leadership Style on Job Satisfaction with Trust-In-Leader as Intervening Variable. Journal of Innovation in Business and Economics Vol. 02 No. 02 pp. 61-70.
Puji Wulandari dan Hamidah Nayati Utami (2018). Hubungan Kepemimpinan Dan Kepuasan Kerja Dengan Loyalitas Pegawai (Studi Pada Pegawai Kantor PT Pembangkitan Jawa-Bali Unit Pembangkit Brantas). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, Vol. 65
Rahmad Hidayat, Teddy Chandra, dan Harry P. Panjaitan (2018). Influence Of Organizational Culture, Work Motivation, And Leadership Style On Job Satisfaction And Employee Performance At Gas Stations In Rokan Hilir. Kurs, Vol. 3 No. 2.
Rivai, Veithzal & Basri Ahmad Fawzi M. (2005). Performance Appraisal. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Saprudin. (2018). Pengaruh Pelatihan Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan. Journal of Information System, Applied Management, Accounting and Research. Vol. 2.
Stephen P Robbins & Mary Coulter. (2016). Manajemen. Ed 13. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Stephen P. Robbins & Timothy A. Judge. (2013). Organizational Behavior. Ed 15. United States of Amerika: Pearson Education.
Sugiono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Suwatno & Donni Juni Priansa. (2016). Manajemen SDM Dalam Organisasi Publik dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Uma Sekaran & Roger Bougie. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Wibowo. (2017). Manajemen Kinerja. Ed.5. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-15

How to Cite

Peri Sandria, A., & Irfan Noviandy Aulia. (2020). WORK SATISFACTION VALUE VIEWED FROM REACTION OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP, PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING VARIABLES. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 2(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v2i1.516