The Mediating Effects of Government Innovation Capabilities and ICT Development: E-Government Implementation and Organizational Value Creation in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i4.4121Keywords:
E-Government, Government Innovation Capabilities, ICT Development, Organizational Value Creation, Mediating role.Abstract
Various studies provide evidence that E-Government Implementation contributes to Organizational Value Creation, but more research is still needed to analyze the mediation effect of Government Innovation Capabilities and ICT Development in the influence of E-Government on Organizational Value Creation in Indonesia. Using primary research data sourced from primary data, questionnaires were distributed to respondents with a total sample of 268, answering the formulation of hypotheses and research models using a parallel mediation effect approach, namely using SEM-PLS and SPSS V.3.4, The results of the study indicate that there is a direct effect of E-Government on Organizational Value Creation, as well as an indirect effect of E-Government on Organizational Value Creation through Government Innovation Capabilities and ICT Development; the influence is more apparent if, through ICT Development, this is possible because of the uneven development and implementation of ICT due to the level of accessibility, use, and skills. In addition, efforts that can be made to improve organizational innovation capabilities must involve essential elements, namely, Top Management, Adequate resources and Absorptive capacity, Organizational slack, Cross-functional collaboration, and Organizational challenges. Researchers suggest that local governments in Indonesia strengthen institutions, technology-based services, and governments that could innovate in providing services to the community to increase good, reliable, effective, efficient, and adaptive organizational governance to changes and community needs.
References
Adam, I. O. (2020). Examining E-Government development effects on corruption in Africa: The mediating effects of ICT development and institutional quality. Technology in Society, 61(February), 101245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101245
Adam, I. O., & Dzang Alhassan, M. (2020). Bridging the global digital divide through digital inclusion: the role of ICT access and ICT use. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(4), 580–596. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-06-2020-0114
Al Sayegh, A. J., Ahmad, S. Z., AlFaqeeh, K. M., & Singh, S. K. (2023). Factors affecting e-government adoption in the UAE public sector organisations: the knowledge management perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2021-0681
Almaiah, M. A., & Nasereddin, Y. (2020). Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services among Jordanian citizens. Electronic Government, 16(3), 236–259. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2020.108453
Alshehri, M., Drew, S., Alhussain, T., & Alghamdi, R. (2012). The effects of website quality on adoption of E-Government service: An empirical study applying UTAUT model using SEM. ACIS 2012?: Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 2011, 1–13.
Avazov, S., & Lee, S. (2022). E-Government Services Adoption in Uzbekistan: An Empirical Validation of Extended Version of the Unified Model of Electronic Government Acceptance (UMEGA). Journal of Policy Studies, 37(3), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.52372/jps37302
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Barrutia, J. M., Echebarria, C., Aguado-Moralejo, I., Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V., & Hartmann, P. (2022). Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121679
Chen, Y., & Li, Q. (2024). The Impact of E-Government on the New Generation Productive Capacities: Evidence from Cross-Country Data. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083233
Chin. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. In MIS Quaterly (Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. vii–xvi).
Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001
Ebrahim, Z., & Irani, Z. (2005). E-government adoption: Architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, 11(5), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150510619902
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Elgohary, E., & Abdelazyz, R. (2020). The impact of employees’ resistance to change on implementing e-government systems: An empirical study in Egypt. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 86(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12139
Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.003
Flak, L. S., & Rose, J. (2005). Stakeholder Governance: Adapting Stakeholder Theory to E-Government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01631
Glyptis, L., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., Giudice, M. Del, Dimitriou, S., & Michael, P. (2020). E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152(December 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119880
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
Hayes, A. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. A Regression-Based Approach (David A. Kenny (ed.); Third Edit). THE GUILFORD PRESS. A Division of Guilford Publications, Inc.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Igartua, J. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2021). Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: Concepts, Computations, and Some Common Confusions. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.46
Jauhari, A., Majid, M. S. A., Basri, H., & Djalil, M. A. (2020). Are E-government and bureaucratic reform promoting good governance towards a better performance of public organization? Quality - Access to Success, 21(175), 25–30.
Kanaan, A., Al-Hawamleh, A., Abulfaraj, A., Al-Kaseasbeh, H. M., & Alorfi, A. H. (2023). The effect of quality, security and privacy factors on trust and intention to use e-government services. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.11.004
Karmakar, R., & Dutta, U. K. (2022). A Study of the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Organizational Performance. Journal of Corporate Governance Research, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5296/jcgr.v6i1.20119
Kwong-Kay, K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1–32. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/39627062/2013_journal_10_PLS_MB-libre.pdf?1446527592=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DPartial_Least_Squares_Structural_Equatio.pdf&Expires=1702011101&Signature=J7LCkmCyQWVT70I~-n01JnGhxu2Pn1AZIuQyulM
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
Luna-Reyes, L., Juiz, C., Gutierrez-Martinez, I., & Duhamel, F. B. (2020). Exploring the relationships between dynamic capabilities and IT governance: Implications for local governments. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2019-0092
Madaki, A. S. ad, Ahmad, K., & Singh, D. (2024). IT integration implementation in e-government public sector in developing countries: a systematic literature review and model development. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, May. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2024-0043
Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(December 2020), 121102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102
Memon, M. A., Cheah, J. H., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., & Chuah, F. (2018). Mediation analysis issues and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 2(1), I–IX. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.2(1)01
Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information and Management, 57(2), 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.004
Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of E-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries, 18(1), 1–24.
Night, S., & Bananuka, J. (2018). The mediating role of adoption of an electronic tax system in the relationship between attitude towards electronic tax system and tax compliance. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 25(49), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2018-0066
Okurebia, L. E., & Akpan, S. (2023). Corporate Governance and Organization Performance in Akwa Ibom State Polytechnic. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research |, 9(6), 150–176. www.ijaar.org
Osborne, S. P., Powell, M., Cui, T., & Strokosch, K. (2022). Value Creation in the Public Service Ecosystem: An Integrative Framework. Public Administration Review, 82(4), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13474
Palumbo, R., Casprini, E., & Fakhar Manesh, M. (2023). Unleashing open innovation in the public sector: a bibliometric and interpretive literature review. Management Decision, 61(13), 103–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2022-1745
Qekaj-Thaçi, A., & Thaçi, L. (2023). The Quality of E-Government Management, Information Security and Quality. Emerging Science Journal, 7(1), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-01-016
Ramayah, T., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using smartPLS 3.0. An updated guide and practical guide to statistical analysis. Handbook of Market Research, July, 967–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2023). A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modelling in data articles. Data in Brief, 48(109074), 1–21.
Rungtusanatham, M., Miller, J. W., & Boyer, K. K. (2014). Theorizing , testing , and concluding for mediation in SCM research?: Tutorial and procedural recommendations. Journal of Operations Management, 32(3), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.01.002
Sabani, A., Thai, V., & Hossain, M. A. (2023). Factors Affecting Citizen Adoption of E-Government in Developing Countries: An Exploratory Case Study From Indonesia. Journal of Global Information Management, 31(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.318131
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research. In Handbook of Market Research (Issue July). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8
Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2010). E-government, e-business, and national economic performance. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26(1), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02614
Sudirman, F. A., & Saidin, S. (2022). Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (E-Government) dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan: Reviu Literatur Sistematis. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 21(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v21i1.269
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356
Taufiqurokhman, T., Satispi, E., Andriansyah, A., Murod, M., & Sulastri, E. (2024). The impact of e-service quality on public trust and public satisfaction in e-government public services. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(2), 765–772. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.1.002
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
Uyar, A., Nimer, K., Kuzey, C., Shahbaz, M., & Schneider, F. (2021). Can e-government initiatives alleviate tax evasion? The moderation effect of ICT. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120597
Uyen Nguyen, T. T., Van Nguyen, P., Truong, G. Q., Ngoc Huynh, H. T., & Hoang Le, T. P. M. (2024). Investigating the impact of citizen relationship quality and the moderating effects of citizen involvement on E-government adoption. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), 100372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100372
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. IMIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
West, D. M. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
Zeleti, F. A., & Mustonen-ollila, E. (2011). ICT Education and Wider Access of Citizens to ICTs as Means to Generate and Distribute E- Government Content. In In 11th European Conference on E-government.
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Applying E-government information system for anti-corruption strategy. 2009 International Conference on Management of E-Commerce and e-Government, ICMeCG 2009, 112–115. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMeCG.2009.40
Zou, Q., Mao, Z., Yan, R., Liu, S., & Duan, Z. (2023). Vision and reality of e-government for governance improvement: Evidence from global cross-country panel data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194(February), 122667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122667
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khamiliyah Lili, Agus Rahayu, Maya Sari, Puspo Dewi Dirgantari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).
