Impact of Crew Change on Contractual Adherence in Maritime Industry: A Case Study of PT. Amas Iscindo Utama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v5i6.2705Keywords:
Crew Change, Contractual Adherence, Maritime Industry, ProfessionalismAbstract
This research investigates the repercussions of crew change practices on contractual adherence within the maritime industry, focusing on PT. Amas Iscindo Utama. Through a mixed-methods approach, quantitative data was collected via structured questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS, supplemented by qualitative insights derived from open-ended responses. Findings reveal that delayed crew recruitment significantly impacts contractual accuracy and compliance, leading to operational disruptions and challenges in crew management. Recruitment challenges, contractual inconsistencies, operational disruptions, and professionalism and standards emerged as key themes, underscoring the multifaceted nature of crew management dynamics. Strategic recommendations include streamlining recruitment processes, developing standardized contractual templates, fostering transparent communication channels, prioritizing professional development initiatives, and safeguarding crew welfare and rights. Collaboration among industry stakeholders is essential to implement proactive measures and uphold professionalism and adherence to contractual obligations within the maritime sector. This research contributes to advancing knowledge and best practices in crew management and contractual governance, informing policy decisions and interventions to enhance the sustainability and competitiveness of the maritime industry.
References
Autsadee, Y., Jeevan, J., Mohd Salleh, N. H. Bin, & Othman, M. R. Bin. (2023). Digital tools and challenges in human resource development and its potential within the maritime sector through bibliometric analysis. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 7(4), 2286409.
Berg, H. P. (2013). Human factors and safety culture in maritime safety. Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation: STCW, Maritime Education and Training (MET), Human Resources and Crew Manning, Maritime Policy, Logistics and Economic Matters, 107, 107–115.
Berg, N., Storgård, J., & Lappalainen, J. (2013). The impact of ship crews on maritime safety. Publications of the Centre for Maritime Studies, University of Turku A, 64, 1–48.
Bergheim, K., Nielsen, M. B., Mearns, K., & Eid, J. (2015). The relationship between psychological capital, job satisfaction, and safety perceptions in the maritime industry. Safety Science, 74, 27–36.
Brenker, M., Möckel, S., Küper, M., Schmid, S., Spann, M., & Strohschneider, S. (2017). Challenges of multinational crewing: a qualitative study with cadets. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 365–384.
Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., & Pentsov, D. A. (2008). The STCW Convention and related instruments. Maritime Work Law Fundamentals: Responsible Shipowners, Reliable Seafarers, 422–639.
Cicek, K., Akyuz, E., & Celik, M. (2019). Future skills requirements analysis in maritime industry. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 270–274.
de la Peña Zarzuelo, I., Soeane, M. J. F., & Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, 100173.
Ferritto, V. R. (2016). Maritime education factors and presenteeism: a comparative quantitative study. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15, 353–380.
Gavalas, D., Syriopoulos, T., & Roumpis, E. (2022). Digital adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 7(1), 11.
Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., Ranmuthugala, D., & Brooks, B. (2014). On a lookout beyond STCW: Seeking standards and context for the authentic assessment of seafarers. 15th Annual General Assembly of the International Association of Maritime Universities, IAMU AGA 2014-Looking Ahead: Innovation in Maritime Education, Training and Research, 77–86.
Ivan?i?, L., Vukši?, V. B., & Spremi?, M. (2019). Mastering the digital transformation process: Business practices and lessons learned. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(2).
Lahibu, D. N., Thalib, M. C., & Mandjo, J. T. (2022). Juridical Review of Working Agreements On The Safety Of Ship Crew. Estudiante Law Journal, 4(2), 612–622.
Sankoff, G. (1972). A quantitative paradigm for the study of communicative competence.
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325.
Zaid, A. A., Jaaron, A. A. M., & Bon, A. T. (2018). The impact of green human resource management and green supply chain management practices on sustainable performance: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 965–979.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mega Kurnia Putri, Larsen Barasa, Brenhard Mangatur Tampubolon

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).