ANALYSIS FUZZY AHP FOR OPTIMIZATION CONTRACTOR SELECTION USING MULTI-CRITERIA IN DETERMINING THE BEST ALTERNATIVE CONTRACTOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v2i6.959Keywords:
Contractor Selection, Multicriteria Decision Making, Fuzzy-AHP, Project Procurement, Project ManagementAbstract
Using inappropriate criteria in contractor’s selection can lead to the failure of a construction project. This study aims to provide an optimal solution for contractor selection using multi-criteria. The criteria were obtained from previous research and concluded in the Focus Group Discussion. The analytical method used is Fuzzy-AHP, involving 14 experts who are registered contractors in the Company who have good performance and the contractor selection process involves a Tender Committee consisting of 5 appointed employees. The conclusion of this study shows that the criteria and weights that can be used for contractor selection are 35% bid, 22% technical ability, 13% financial ability, 11% reputation, 10% management ability and the last safety management with a weight of 9%. Each criterion has sub-criteria indicators with a total of 41 sub-criteria. Result of the consistency ratio below 10%. The conclusion contractor selection analysis using multi-criteria can screen the best contractor.
References
Acheamfour, V. K., Kissi, E., & Adjei-Kumi, T. (2019). Ascertaining the impact of contractors pre-qualification criteria on project success criteria. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
Alptekin, O., & Alptekin, N. (2017, June). Analysis of criteria influencing contractor selection using TOPSIS method. In IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng (Vol. 245, p. 062003).
Araújo, M. C. B., Alencar, L. H., & Mota, C. M. (2015, December). Contractor selection in construction industry: A multicriteria model. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 519-523). IEEE.
Aulady, M. F., Nuciferani, F. T., & Pratama, Y. (2016). pemilihan subkontraktor pada proyek pengembangan rumah sakit dr. soetomo dengan menggunakan metode analytical hierarchy process (ahp). In Seminar Nasional Sains and Teknologi Terapan IV.
Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2016). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 248-264.
Guide, A. (2013). Project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) 5th Edition. In Project Management Institute
Karakhan, A. A., Rajendran, S., Gambatese, J., & Nnaji, C. (2018). Measuring and evaluating safety maturity of construction contractors: Multicriteria decision-making approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(7), 04018054.
Kerzner, H. (2014). Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence, 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Kog, F., & Yaman, H. (2016). A multi-agent systems-based contractor pre-qualification model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
Meredith, J., & Mantel, S. J. (2009). Project Management: A Managerial Approach,7th Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Maliene, V. (2016). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega, 59, 146-156.
Naji, H. I. (2015). build a multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of a contractor in construction projects. diyala journal of engineering sciences, 8(4), 121-133.
Nicholas, J. M., & Steyn, H. (2020). Project management for business, engineering, and technology: Principles and practice, Sixth edition. Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group
Prasetia, F. T., & Imaroh, T. S. (2020). contractor selection assessment strategy in the upstream oil and gas industry towards green supply chain management. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 1(3), 373-383.
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2001). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Boston, Mass: Kluwer academic.
Sandika, P., & Patradhiani, R. (2019). Analisis Pemilihan Kontraktor Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)(Studi Kasus Pembangunan Jembatan di Desa Karangan). Integrasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 4(1), 1-8.
Stoner, J. A. (1968). Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(4), 442-459.
Taylan, O., Kabli, M. R., Porcel, C., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Contractor selection for construction projects using consensus tools and big data. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(4), 1267-1281.
Zadeh, L. A. (1996). Fuzzy sets. In Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: selected papers by Lotfi A Zadeh (pp. 394-432).
Alptekin, O., & Alptekin, N. (2017, June). Analysis of criteria influencing contractor selection using TOPSIS method. In IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng (Vol. 245, p. 062003).
Araújo, M. C. B., Alencar, L. H., & Mota, C. M. (2015, December). Contractor selection in construction industry: A multicriteria model. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 519-523). IEEE.
Aulady, M. F., Nuciferani, F. T., & Pratama, Y. (2016). pemilihan subkontraktor pada proyek pengembangan rumah sakit dr. soetomo dengan menggunakan metode analytical hierarchy process (ahp). In Seminar Nasional Sains and Teknologi Terapan IV.
Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2016). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 248-264.
Guide, A. (2013). Project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) 5th Edition. In Project Management Institute
Karakhan, A. A., Rajendran, S., Gambatese, J., & Nnaji, C. (2018). Measuring and evaluating safety maturity of construction contractors: Multicriteria decision-making approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(7), 04018054.
Kerzner, H. (2014). Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence, 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Kog, F., & Yaman, H. (2016). A multi-agent systems-based contractor pre-qualification model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
Meredith, J., & Mantel, S. J. (2009). Project Management: A Managerial Approach,7th Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Maliene, V. (2016). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega, 59, 146-156.
Naji, H. I. (2015). build a multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of a contractor in construction projects. diyala journal of engineering sciences, 8(4), 121-133.
Nicholas, J. M., & Steyn, H. (2020). Project management for business, engineering, and technology: Principles and practice, Sixth edition. Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group
Prasetia, F. T., & Imaroh, T. S. (2020). contractor selection assessment strategy in the upstream oil and gas industry towards green supply chain management. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 1(3), 373-383.
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2001). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Boston, Mass: Kluwer academic.
Sandika, P., & Patradhiani, R. (2019). Analisis Pemilihan Kontraktor Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)(Studi Kasus Pembangunan Jembatan di Desa Karangan). Integrasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 4(1), 1-8.
Stoner, J. A. (1968). Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(4), 442-459.
Taylan, O., Kabli, M. R., Porcel, C., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Contractor selection for construction projects using consensus tools and big data. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(4), 1267-1281.
Zadeh, L. A. (1996). Fuzzy sets. In Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: selected papers by Lotfi A Zadeh (pp. 394-432).
Downloads
Published
2021-08-20
How to Cite
Rustandi, D., & Shilul Imaroh, T. . (2021). ANALYSIS FUZZY AHP FOR OPTIMIZATION CONTRACTOR SELECTION USING MULTI-CRITERIA IN DETERMINING THE BEST ALTERNATIVE CONTRACTOR. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 2(6), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v2i6.959
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS).
