Constructing Employee Engagement Among Generation Z Employees: A Phenomenological Study In The Organizational Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijms.v7i6.7091Keywords:
Employee Engagement, Generation Z, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), Human Resource Management, Meaningful WorkAbstract
Employee engagement has become a critical issue in human resource management, particularly with the growing dominance of Generation Z in the workforce. Unlike previous generations, Generation Z places greater emphasis on meaningful work, career development, supportive relationships, and psychological well-being. However, existing studies are largely dominated by quantitative approaches, offering limited insight into how Generation Z employees construct employee engagement through their lived experiences. This study aims to explore the construction of employee engagement among Generation Z employees using a qualitative approach with an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with purposively selected Generation Z employees and analyzed by identifying key themes from participants’ experiences. The findings reveal that employee engagement is constructed through recognition, trust, supportive interpersonal relationships, participatory leadership, opportunities for growth, work autonomy, and meaningful work. Rather than reflecting unconditional organizational loyalty, employee engagement is understood as a dynamic reciprocal relationship that is continuously shaped by employees’ work experiences. This study contributes to the employee engagement literature by providing a phenomenological perspective that positions employees’ subjective experiences at the center of analysis and offers practical implications for developing human resource management strategies that align with the characteristics of Generation Z
References
Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work Engagement: Current Trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands–Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Breevaart, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2018). Daily Job Demands and Employee Work Engagement: The Role of Daily Transformational Leadership Behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(3), 338–349.
Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2015). Daily Transactional and Transformational Leadership and Daily Employee Engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12041
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ``What’’ and ``Why’’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deloitte. (2024). 2024 Gen Z and Millennial Survey.
Dimock, M. (2019). Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins.
Gallup. (2024). State of the Global Workplace 2024 Report.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic Methodological Review: Developing a Framework for a Qualitative Semi-Structured Interview Guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in Qualitative Research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x
Ozkan, M., & Solmaz, B. (2015). The Changing Face of the Employees: Generation Z and Their Perceptions of Work (A Study Applied to University Students). Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00876-X
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring Human Resources Management and Employee Engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. A. (2021). Organizational Culture and Leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.
Schroth, H. (2019). Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Van Manen, M. (2017). Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Prastiyo Diatmono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS).
