The Effect of Character Education on The Academic Motivation of Students at State Vocational School 15 Bandung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijms.v7i2.5812Keywords:
Character Education, Academic Motivation, Vocational High Schools, Self-Efficacy, SEM-PLSAbstract
Character education is a key pillar in fostering sustainable academic motivation amidst the challenges of moral degradation and low student engagement in vocational schools. This study aims to analyze the influence of character education on the academic motivation of students at State Vocational High School (SMK) 15 Bandung, focusing on the dimensions of responsibility, integrity, and discipline in the context of vocational learning. A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing an explanatory survey method with 397 student respondents from four expertise programs: Social Work, Hospitality, Culinary, and Visual Communication Design. Data were collected through a Likert-scale-based questionnaire and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) with SmartPLS 4 software. The results showed that character education had a positive and significant effect on students' academic motivation. Character values were proven to strengthen students' self-efficacy, learning persistence, and goal orientation through increased self-regulation and perceptions of educational responsibility. These findings confirm the principles of self-determination theory and social-cognitive theory, which suggest that character-based learning can increase intrinsic motivation through the interaction between personal, social, and cognitive factors. This research makes theoretical contributions to the development of an integrative character-motivation model and offers practical implications for teachers and policymakers in designing learning experiences that foster student responsibility, independence, and overall well-being.
References
Ariani, D. W. (2017). Relationship model of personality, organizational culture, motivation, and performance. Management Science Letters, 7(2), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2016.11.004
Abdrakhmanova, K., Kadirbayeva, R., Kudaibergenova, K., Zharmukhanbetov, S., & Nurmukhanbetova, G. (2025). Formation of STEM competencies of future teachers: Kazakhstani experience. Open Education Studies, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0058
Amaechi, C. V., Amaechi, E. C., Onumonu, U. P., & Kgosiemang, I. M. (2022). Systematic review and annotated bibliography on teaching in higher education academies (HEAs) via group learning to adapt to COVID-19. Education Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100699
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. SAGE Publications.
Canto-López, M. D. C., Manchado Porras, M., Charlo, J. C., Mera Cantillo, C., Delgado-Casas, C., Aragón-Mendizábal, E., & García Sedeño, M. A. (2022). Description of main innovative and alternative methodologies for mathematical learning of written algorithms in primary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913536
Cleary, T., Zhang, R., Russo, M. R., & Slemp, J. (2025). A systematic review of the Self-Regulation Strategy Inventory (SRSI): Uses, applications, and psychometric characteristics. School Psychology Review, 54(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2024.2344107
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
de Morais, M. A. S., da Silva, A. A., & de Oliveira, T. P. (2024). Methodological strategies employed in psychological studies on gender stereotypes among children: A systematic review. Trends in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-024-00417-9
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Flores, P., Coelho, E., Mourão-Carvalhal, M. I., & Forte, P. (2023). Association between motor and math skills in preschool children with typical development: Systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105391
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hasselhorn, M. (2022). Learning disorders: An unavoidable fate? Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 36(1–2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000324
Hong, W., Star, J. R., Liu, R.-D., Jiang, R., & Fu, X. (2023). A systematic review of mathematical flexibility: Concepts, measurements, and related research. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09825-2
Hui, H. B., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). Influence of game-based learning in mathematics education on the students’ cognitive and affective domain: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105806
Ismail, S. A. S., Maat, S. M., & Khalid, F. (2025). From numbers to nerves: A score year of scientometric study on mathematics anxiety. Acta Psychologica, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105621
Kamaruddin, S. A. (2019). Character education and students’ moral behavior: Evidence from Indonesian schools. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12341a
Kihaga, H., Søndergaard, B., Kitta, S., & Likinjiye, M. (2025). Strategies for teaching and assessing students in large mathematics classes in secondary schools in Tanzania: A systematic review. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101744
Knogler, M., Hetmanek, A., & Seidel, T. (2022). Determining an evidence base for particular fields of educational practice: A systematic review of meta-analyses on effective mathematics and science teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873995
Li, Q., & Kim, S. (2024). Meta-analysis of fMRI studies related to mathematical creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1400328
Lickona, T. (2018). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.
Liu, W., Mei, J., Tian, L., & Huebner, E. S. (2016). Age and gender differences in the relationship between school-related social support and subjective well-being among school students. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 1065–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0873-1
Lee, S., & Thoma, S. J. (2021). Moral character and academic motivation: A structural model analysis. Journal of Moral Education, 50(3), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2020.1717621
Lestari, N. D., & Widodo, H. (2021). The Influence of School Climate and Moral Values on Students' Learning Motivation Cogent Education, 8(1), 1995214. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1995214
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Nugroho, Y., & Prasetyo, A. (2023). Character-Based Education and Student Motivation: The Moderating Role of the School Environment. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00651-9
Onwubuya, G. (2025). Systematic review of professional development of teachers of multilingual learners in the mathematics classroom. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101535
Osei, P. C., & Bjorklund, D. F. (2024). Motivating the learning process: Integrating self-determination theory into a dynamical systems framework. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09934-6
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2018). Character strengths and academic achievement: Evidence from adolescents. Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1308817
Pearson, J., Giacumo, L. A., Farid, A., & Sadegh, M. (2022). A systematic multiple-studies review of low‐income, first‐generation, and underrepresented, STEM‐degree support programs: Emerging evidence‐based models and recommendations. Education Sciences, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050333
Rahmawati, I., & Mulyana, E. (2020). The role of moral intelligence in enhancing the academic motivation of vocational students. Indonesian Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijep.v9i2.27418
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. Advances in Motivation Science, 6, 111–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.01.001
Saga, M., Rkhaila, A., Ounine, K., & Oubaha, D. (2022). Developmental dyscalculia: The progress of cognitive modeling in the field of numerical cognition deficits for children. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 11(4), 904–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1955679
Sari, D. P., & Rahmawati, F. (2022). Character Education and Academic Motivation among Vocational Students: The Mediating Role of Learning Climate. Journal of Technical and Vocational Education Research, 9(4), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tver.2022.04.007
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Song, J., MacQuarrie, S., Hennessey, A., & Zheng, Y. (2025). A systematic realist review of school-based working memory training: Understanding effectiveness, mechanisms, and transferability for improved academic performance. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 233(2), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000596
Sulistyowati, N., & Setiawan, R. (2020). Character education and responsibility development in vocational learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i1.15340
Tariq, M. U., Poulin, M., & Abonamah, A. A. (2021). Achieving operational excellence through artificial intelligence: Driving forces and barriers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686624
Tonizzi, I., & Usai, M. C. (2023). Math abilities in autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104559
Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2021). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (8th ed.). Wiley.
Uğraş, H. (2025). Research on mathematics anxiety in primary school: Bibliometric analysis and evaluation of trends. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1545556
Wang, M., Mohd Matore, M. E. E., & Rosli, R. (2025). A systematic literature review on analytical thinking development in mathematics education: Trends across time and countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1523836
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 657–700). Wiley.
Wei, Y., Zhang, Q., & Guo, J. (2022). Can mathematical modelling be taught and learned in primary mathematics classrooms: A systematic review of empirical studies. Education Sciences, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120923
Wentzel, K. R., & Miele, D. B. (2016). Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed.). Routledge
individual differences in mathematical flexibility. Educational Psychology Review, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10051-1
Yu, H. (2023). The neuroscience basis and educational interventions of mathematical cognitive impairment and anxiety: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1282957
Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Improving students’ mathematics self-efficacy: A systematic review of intervention studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986622
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fitri Nurul Fauziah, Dasim Budimansyah, Kama Abdul Hakam, Asep Dahliyana, Imas Kurniawaty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS).
