Analysis Logistic Information Systems and Waiting Line Methods on Lion Parcel Customer Satisfaction During Covid-19 (2020-2021)

Authors

  • Erny Sulistyaningsih Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Johanes Kurniawan Liauwuthor Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ariyo Adi Nurcahyo Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Maulidiyah Usnul Khotimah Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijms.v5i5.2754

Keywords:

Logistic Information System, Waiting Line Method, Customer Satisfaction, Covid-19 Pandemic

Abstract

This study assesses customer satisfaction with Lion Parcel during the 2020-2021 COVID-19 period, noting a substantial surge in orders during the pandemic and peak seasons. The research explores the potential of a Logistics Information System as a broader communication network for companies to send and receive information. Additionally, it employs the Waiting Line Method to address customer queue service issues. The study, involving 100 respondents categorized by gender, age, and occupation, utilizes quantitative methods with SmartPLS version 4.0. The analysis reveals that the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values for the Logistics Information System (X1), Waiting Line Method (X2), and Customer Satisfaction (Y) exceed the 0.5 threshold, with values of 0.693, 0.625, and 0.829, respectively. The R-Square value of 0.711 suggests that all exogenous latent constructs collectively influence Customer Satisfaction (Y) by 71% in this study and 29% were influenced by other factors.

References

Afghani, M. F., & Yulianti, E. (2017). PENGARUH KEPERCAYAAN, KEAMANAN, PERSEPSI RISIKO, SERTA KESADARAN NASABAH TERHADAP ADOPSI E-BANKING DI BANK BRI SURABAYA. (Journal of Business & Banking).

Dr. Ir. Suntoro, M. T. (2020). Fundamental Manajemen Logistik: Fungsi Logistik dalam Implementasi dan Operasi. Prenada Media.

Firmansyah, L., & Hafidudin, H. (2019). LOGISTIK TERINTEGRASI BARCODE SCANNER DAN WEB Design and Implementation of Information System for Logistic Integreted Barcode Scanner and Web. E-Proceeding of Applied Science, 5(1), 280–288.

Gultom, D. K., Arif, M., & Muhammad Fahmi. (2020). Determinasi Kepuasan Pelanggan Terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan Melalui Kepercayaan Dedek. MANEGGGIO: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen, 3(2), 273–282.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition PDF eBook. Pearson Education.

Indrasari, M., & Press, U. (2019). PEMASARAN DAN KEPUASAN PELANGGAN: pemasaran dan kepuasan pelanggan. Unitomo Press.

Muchlis, L. S., & Ma’ruf, F. (2021). Application of the Waiting Line Method for Evaluation of the IAIN Batusangkar Information Technology Helpdesk Information System. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(7), 516–524.

Nuryanto, & Hidayana, A. (2021). Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Logistik Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Menggunakan Jasa Trucking Pada Rekanan Pt. Samudera Bandar Logistik Jakarta. Majalah Ilmiah Gema Maritim, 23(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.37612/gema-maritim.v23i1.120

Sasmito Muslim, S., Wibowo, N. A., & Nofandi, F. (2021). Analisis Penerapan Sistem Informasi Manajemen pada Kegiatan Logistik di Indonesia. Dinamika Bahari, 2(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.46484/db.v2i1.262

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sulistyaningsih, E., Transportasi, M., Logistik, D. A. N., & Trisakti, I. T. L. (2018). PRODUKSI PRODUK KEMASAN.

Wibowo, & Suseno, A. (2022). Aplikasi Metode Waiting Line Pada Pelayanan Antrian Pelanggan Jasa Ekspedisi (Studi Kasus: JNE Galuh Mas Karawang). (J. Ilm. Wahana Pendidik.).

Published

2024-06-23

How to Cite

Erny Sulistyaningsih, Liauwuthor, J. K. ., Nurcahyo, A. A. ., & Khotimah, M. U. . (2024). Analysis Logistic Information Systems and Waiting Line Methods on Lion Parcel Customer Satisfaction During Covid-19 (2020-2021). Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 5(5), 1100–1110. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijms.v5i5.2754