Decision Quality Questionnaire: An Instrument to Measure the Quality of Your Decision in Professional Life

Authors

  • Fiona Laurensia Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
  • Kwartarini Wahyu Yuniarti Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
  • Muhadjir Darwin Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
  • Sumaryono Sumaryono Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v5i3.2140

Keywords:

Decision Quality, Decision Making Process, Decision Making Skills, Decision Maker, : Decision quality, decision-making process, decision-making skills, decision maker, leadership decision.

Abstract

Research objectives so that the quality of decisions made by leaders in the organization can be measured using valid and reliable measurement tools measured by using valid and reliable measuring instruments. Method literature review, questionnaire formulation, validity & reliability test validity & reliability of the questionnaire. Results The questionnaire is valid and reliable to be used as a measuring tool for Decision Quality. Contribution this study aims to provide a research instrument that is to measure Decision Quality. The quality of the decision is the quality that results from the results of the decision that has been applied or tested to the maximum and the results are seen to the maximum and assessed to the maximum as well. From the results of data processing using SPSS, it produces a Scale Statistics Mean of 46.8829, Variance 41.133, Std Deviation 6.41352, Validity respondent 205, Crochbach Alpa 0.888. Product Moment Correlation coefficient or rcount > 0.3, so it can be said that all statement items on the questionnaire have good validity. Meanwhile, the entire Cronbach's Alpha coefficient value obtained for all items is > 0.872 so it can be stated that all statement items on the questionnaire have good reliability (> 0.6).

References

Awujo, A.C. (1989). Corporate Social Responsibility. An Unpublished MBA Lecture notes, Department of Management, University of Port Harcourt.

Bujar, M., McAuslane, N., Walker, S. R., & Salek, S. (2017). Evaluating quality of decision-making processes in medicines’ development, regulatory review, and health technology assessment: A systematic review of the literature. In Frontiers in Pharmacology (Vol. 8, Issue APR). Frontiers Research Foundation. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00189

Donelan, R., Walker, S., and Salek, S. (2015). Factors influencing quality decision making: regulatory and pharmaceutical industry perspectives. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 24, 319–328. doi: 10.1002/ pds.3752

Donelan, R., Walker, S., & Salek, S. (2016). The development and validation of a generic instrument, QoDoS, for assessing the quality of decision making. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 7, 180.

Elwyn, G., & Miron-Shatz, T. (2010). Deliberation before determination: The definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expectations, 13(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00572.x

Kriston, L., Scholl, I., Hölzel, L., Simon, D., Loh, A., & Härter, M. (2010). The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Education and Counseling, 80(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034

Lee, C. N., Wetschler, M. H., Chang, Y., Belkora, J. K., Moy, B., Partridge, A., & Sepucha, K. R. (2014). Measuring decision quality: Psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer chemotherapy. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-73

Leyva, G. P., & Garcia, J. C. P. (2018). Proposal of a Measurement Scale of Decision Quality in Infrastructure Projects in Oil and Gas Exploitation. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14(7), 272. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n7p272

Lin, C. P., Chen, K. J., Liu, C. M., & Liao, C. H. (2019). Assessing decision quality and team performance: perspectives of knowledge internalization and resource adequacy. Review of Managerial Science, 13(2), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0253-0

Sanz de Acedo Lizarraga, M. L., Sanz de Acedo Baquedano, M. T., Oliver, M. S., & Closas, A. (2009). Development and validation of a decision-making questionnaire. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 37(3), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880902956959

Scholl, I., Kriston, L., Dirmaier, J., Buchholz, A., & Härter, M. (2012). Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - physician version (SDM-Q-Doc). Patient Education and Counseling, 88(2), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005

Scholl, I., Loon, MK Van, Sepucha , K., Elwyn, G., Légaré, F., Härter , M., & Dirmaier , J. (2011). Measurement of shared decision making - A review of instruments. Journal for evidence , continuing education and quality Im Health , 105 (4), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.012

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th Edition). Wiley & Sons.

Sepucha, K., Ozanne, E., Silvia, K., Partridge, A., & Mulley, A. G. (2007). An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. Patient Education and Counseling, 65(2), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.007

Sepucha K, Levin C, Uzogara E, Barry M, O’Connor A, Mulley A. Developing instruments to measure the quality of decisions: Early results for a set of symptom- driven decisions. Patient Education and Counseling 2008 73:504-510.

Sepucha K, Stacey D, Clay C, Chang Y, Cosenza C, Dervin G, Dorrwachter J, Feibelmann S, Katz JN, Kearing S, Malchau H, Taljaard M, Tomek I, Tugwell P, Levin C. Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12(1):149.

Spetzler, C., Winter, H. and Meyer, J. (2016) Decision Quality. 1st edn. Wiley.

Yates, J. (2003). Decision Management: How to Assure Better Decisions in Your Company. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Yates, J. Frank, and Stephanie De Oliveira. 2016. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Culture and Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 136: 106–18.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-16

How to Cite

Laurensia, F., Yuniarti, K. W., Darwin, M., & Sumaryono, S. (2024). Decision Quality Questionnaire: An Instrument to Measure the Quality of Your Decision in Professional Life. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 5(3), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v5i3.2140

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (January-February 2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Fiona Laurensia, Kwartarini Wahyu Yuniarti, Muhadjir Darwin, Sumaryono Sumaryono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS).