The Effect of Training Material and Instructor on the Behavior of Graduates of Teacher Academy Program with Learning Outcome as Intervening Variable (Case Study at XYZ Company)

Authors

  • Sally Arianita Dewi Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta
  • Ahmad Badawi Saluy Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v4i2.1501

Keywords:

Training Material, Instructor, Kirkpatrick, Learning Outcome, Behavior

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of training material and instructor on the training graduates’ behavior with learning outcome as an intervening variable in Teacher Academy batch 3 program at XYZ company. Learning outcome and behavior are level 2 and 3 of Kirkpatrick evaluation model. The method used in this research is descriptive quantitative research with a causal relationship approach. The population in this study is the participants of Teacher Academy batch 3 program. The number of samples in this research is 100 respondents. Data analysis is done using Structural Equation Model (SEM) with SmartPLS (Partial Least Square) 3.0. The results show that there is a positive and significant effect of training material on participants’ learning outcome, a positive and significant effect of training instructor on participants’ learning outcome, a positive and significant effect of training material and training instructor on participants’ learning outcome, and a positive and significant effect of participants’ learning outcome on the training graduates’ behavior. Learning outcome can mediate the effect of training material and instructor on the training graduates’ behavior.

References

P. Dimas and D. Simanjuntak, “Pengaruh Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Pada Kantor Cabang Dinas Pendidikan Kecamatan Kualuh Hulu Labuhanbatu Utara,” ECOBISMA (JURNAL Ekon. BISNIS DAN MANAJEMEN), vol. 4, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.36987/ecobi.v4i2.88.

D. L. Kirkpatrick, Evaluating Training Programs (2nd Ed.). San Fransisco: Berret-Koehler Publisher Inc, 1998.

A. Alsalamah and C. Callinan, “The Kirkpatrick model for training evaluation: bibliometric analysis after 60 years (1959–2020),” Industrial and Commercial Training, vol. 54, no. 1. 2021, doi: 10.1108/ICT-12-2020-0115.

K. Jehanzeb and N. Ahmed Bashir, “Training and Development Program and its Benefits to Employee and Organization: A Conceptual Study,” Eur. J. Bus. Manag., vol. 5, no. 2, 2013.

A. B. Saluy, T. Musanti, and B. Mulyana, “PENGARUH PELATIHAN, MOTIVASI KERJA DAN KOMPETENSI TERHADAP KINERJA PERSONEL DI MAKOSEK HANUDNAS I.,” J. Manag. Bus. Rev., vol. 16, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.34149/jmbr.v16i1.151.

A. B. Saluy and Y. Treshia, “Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Disiplin Kerja Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan ( Studi Kasus di Perusahaan PT IE ),” J. Ilm. Manaj. dan Bisnis, vol. 02, no. January, 2018.

M. M. Nda and R. Y. Fard, “the Impact of Employee Training and Development on Employee Productivity,” Glob. Inst. Res. Educ., vol. 2, no. 6, 2013.

M. Y. Gutara, T. Pogo, and A. B. Saluy, “Pengaruh Pelatihan, Motivasi Kerja, Dan Kompetensi Profesional Terhadap Kinerja Guru,” Indik. J. Ilm. Manaj. dan Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 73–81, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.22441/INDIKATOR.V5I2.10016.

A. B. Saluy, M. F. Wajdi, and C. Chaerudin, “Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru Budaya Organisasi Dan Iklim Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru,” Indik. J. Ilm. Manaj. dan Bisnis, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 26–42, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.22441/INDIKATOR.V2I3.3286.

E. P. Widoyoko, Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2017.

A. B. Saluy and P. Prihatini, “The Effect of Leadership Motivation, and Training on Employee’s Performance in Enso Hotel,” 2021, doi: 10.4108/eai.28-9-2020.2307724.

J. F. Hair Jr., L. M. Matthews, R. L. Matthews, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use,” Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal., vol. 1, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.1504/ijmda.2017.10008574.

I. Ghozali, Structural Equation Modeling, Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (PLS)., 4th ed. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2014.

A. Asgar and R. Satyanarayana, “An evaluation of faculty development programme on the design and development of self-learning materials for open distance learning,” Asian Assoc. Open Univ. J., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 98–115, May 2021, doi: 10.1108/AAOUJ-11-2020-0094/FULL/PDF.

G. M. Chukwu, “Trainer attributes as drivers of training effectiveness,” Ind. Commer. Train., vol. 48, no. 7, 2016, doi: 10.1108/ICT-02-2016-0013.

P. I. Y. Wisastra and E. J. Sagala, “Pengaruh Pelatihan Terhadap Kompetensi Karyawan PT. LEN INDUSTRI (Persero) Bandung,” Matrik J. Manajemen, Strateg. Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 2016, doi: 10.24843/matrik:jmbk.2016.v10.i02.p01.

Saluy, AB.et.all. ANALYSIS OF LABOR OVERTIME AND PRODUCTIVITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. Vol.17.Issu, 12/9/2022. page, 559-565.

Saluy,AB. Strategi Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Berkelanjutan Di Rumah Sakit Tipe C Jakarta Timur]. Jurnal Doktor Manajemen. Vol5.Issu,1. page, 15-25.

Bustami Zainudin., Ahmad Hidayat Sutawidjaya., A. B. Saluy., Maszudulhak Djamil.,Endri Endri. The Effect of Compensation, Leadership, and Supervision on Performance of Government Civil Servants: Mediating Role ofAdversity Quotient. Linguistics and Culture Review,V ol.5, Issu.1, Pages 453-469.

Wulandari, Arviana, “Pengaruh Instruktur Pelatihan, Peserta Pelatihan, Materi Pelatihan, Metode Pelatihan dan Tujuan Pelatihan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan,” Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 2020, doi: 10.32534/jv.v15i1.1010.

S. E. Widodo, Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2015.

Published

2022-12-06

How to Cite

Arianita Dewi, S., & Ahmad Badawi Saluy. (2022). The Effect of Training Material and Instructor on the Behavior of Graduates of Teacher Academy Program with Learning Outcome as Intervening Variable (Case Study at XYZ Company). Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 4(2), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v4i2.1501