The Contribution Of The Philosophy Of Science In Research Science And Social Life

Authors

  • Fatonah Fatonah FKIP, Jambi of university
  • Ismail Ismail Muhammad Azim Institute of Islam, and State Islamic University of Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin jambi
  • Teguh Adimarta Muhammad Azim Institute of Islam
  • Mar’atun Sholiha FKIP, Jambi of university
  • Rafik Darmansyah Muhammad Azim Institute of Islam
  • Fardinal Fardinal Lecturer at The State Islamic Institute of Kerinci
  • Yanfaunnas Yanfaunnas MAN 1 Bungo
  • Bimo Tunggal Prastetyo Nurul Islam Institute
  • Risatri Gusmahansyah MTsN 3 Jambi City

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v4i1.1401

Keywords:

Contributions of Philosophy of Science, Research Scientific, Social Life

Abstract

This article reviews the Contribution of the Philosophy of Science in Scientific Research and Social Life, which is a form of qualitative research and literature study or Philosophy of Science library research. The results of this literature review article show that: (1) History records that philosophy has bridged the change from mythcentric to logocentric, the change from thinking patterns based on myth and superstition to thinking patterns based on science (logos). This change in mindset has proven to have far-reaching implications for civilization. Nature and its phenomena that were previously feared are then studied, researched, and even exploited. From these investigations of natural phenomena, various theories and scientific findings were found that explain the changes and phenomena that occur, both in the universe (macrocosm) and in the human world (microcosm). (2) The influence of knowledge in the course of philosophical life from century to century, from myth, anthropos, and then to theos (theology/dogma) and changed to logos. That is the journey of the philosophy of knowledge to become a philosophy of science which later gave birth to the sciences of astronomy, cosmology, physics, chemistry, and so on. Meanwhile, from the investigation of the human microcosm, the sciences of biology, psychology, sociology, and so on have developed. Over time, these sciences have developed to become more specialized and increasingly produce technologies that have a direct and broad impact on civilization and human life. (3) The philosophy of science itself contributes to scientific inquiry and in human life, especially These sciences then develop into more specialized and increasingly produce technologies that have a direct and broad impact on civilization and human life. (3) The philosophy of science itself contributes to scientific inquiry and in human life, especiallyknowledge in the form of deductive reasoning related to empirical and positivist (qualitative) and inductive reasoning with rationalism, constructivist and critical (qualitative). Although rationally science compiles its knowledge consistently and cumulatively, empirically science separates knowledge that is in accordance with facts and that which is not. Therefore, before being empirically verified, all rational explanations put forward are only hypothetical. (4) In addition, the philosophy of science has also substantially, methodically and relevantly provided a new paradigm in scientific research as well as for human life, namely; Positivism Paradigm, Constructivist Paradigm, and Critical Paradigm. These three paradigms are very important for a researcher who will compose a scientific work, be it a thesis, thesis or dissertation or other scientific paper.

References

Affandi, A. (2019). Functions of the Philosophy of Science in the Development of Scientific Methods. Al-Hikmah Journal, 7, 104.

Alston, W. P. (1964). Philosophy of Language (E. Cliffs (ed.)). Prentice-Hall.

Appignanesi, R. & C. G. (1988). Recognizing Postmodernism; For Beginners, (Translation). mizan.

Bagus, L. (1991). Metaphysics. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Bertens, K. (1976). Summary of the History of Philosophy. Kanisius Foundation.

Dewey, J. (1927). Role of Philosophy in the History of Civilization. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Philosophy.

EB, J. P. (1956). The Natural of Mathematics, The Word of Mathematics. Simon & Schuster.

Ernest, N. (1956). Essays in the Philosophy of Science,. In Logic Whithout Metaphysica and other (p. 3).

George J. Mouly, J. S., & Suriasumantri. (1991). The Development of Science, in Science in Perspective: A Collection of Essays on the Nature of Science. gramedia.

Gie, T. L. (1979). A Concept Towards Control in the Field of Philosophy. Translation of Ali Mudhofir, Faculty of Philosophy, Gadjah Mada University.

Greek, F. P. (1967). A Historical Lexicon. In Philosophical Term (p. 156). New York University Press.

Guba and Lincoln. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.

Hadiwijono, H. (1980). Essay on the History of Western Philosophy 2. Kanisius Foundation.

Hamersma, H. (1992). Figures of Modern Western Philosophy (pp. 141–142). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Herbert, S. (1955). produced in Dagobert D. Runes, ed., Treasury of Philosophy. In First Principle (pp. 1125–1126).

Ismaun. (2002). Philosophy of Science (pp. 44–53). UPI Bandung.

Joad. (1994). Philosophy. In CEM (pp. 23–31). English University Press.

Johnstone, Henry W., (ed). (1968). What is Philosophy; Introduction (p. 6).

Kneale, W. (1972). Philosophy. In Encyclopaedia Britannica (p. 864).

Kuhn, T. S. (1993). The Role of Paradigms in the Science Revolution. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Publisher:

Limakrisna, N., Noor, Z. Z., & Ali, H. (2016). Model of employee performance: The empirical study at civil servants in government of west java province. International Journal of Economic Research.

Lewis, C. (1973). Philosophy. In The Encyclopedia Americana (p. 774).

Maksum, A. (2011). Introduction to Philosophy: from classical to postmodernism. Ar-Ruzzi Media, Cet. IV.

Maksum, A. (2014). Introduction to Philosophy: From Classical Period to Postmodernism,. Ar-Ruzzi Media, Cet. IV.

Mora, J. F. (1960). Conflicting Tendencies in Contemporary Thought. In Philosophy Today (pp. 70–74).

Nas, L. K. (1963). The Nature of the Nature Sciences (p. 168). Little & Brown.

Pap Arthur. (1956). 20th Century Philosophers,. In Elements of Analytic Philosophy: (p. 299). Macmillan.

Peursen, V. (1985). Modern Philosophy. In A History of Philosophy (p. 8). Image Books.

Santoso, H. (2012). A Critique of Modern Metaphysics and Epistemology:. In Santoso Listiyono, et al. “Left Epistemology.” In Jacques Derrida’s Method of Deconstruction (p. 251). Ar-Ruzz Media.

Sidgwick, H. (1971). An Introductory Course of Lectures, published in William T. Blackstone, ed, Meaning and Exixtence Introductory Readings in Philosophy. In Philosophy, Its Scope and Relations (p. 17).

Siswomihardjo, K. wibisono. (n.d.). Philosophy of Science as a Basis for the Development of Science. Intan Pariwara.

Siswomihardjo, K. wibisono. (1985). Philosophy and Its Actuality in National Development. In 1945 (p. 3). Gadjah Mada University Press.

Siswomihardjo, K. wibisono. (1999). Introduction Towards the Philosophy of Science A Historical Review: (Diktat of Philosophy Courses).

Storig, H. J. (1970). Geschiedenis van de Filosofie 1-2. Het Spectrum Utrecht Anwer Pen.

Suriasumantri, J. S. (1984). Philosophy of Science. Sinar Harapan Library.

Suriasumantri, J. S. (1993). Philosophy of Science: A Popular Introduction. Sinar Harapan Library.

Suriasumantri, J. S. (2005). Science phylosophy. Sinar Harapan Library.

Titus, H. H. (1959). Living issues in philosophy. American Book.

White, M. (1957). The Age of Analysis: 20th Century Philosopher. The New American Library of World Literature.

Whitehead, A. N. (1953). Modes of Thought, Lecture 9 (“The Aim of Philosophy”). (produced in FSC Northrop & Mason W. G Gross, eds., Alfred North Whitehead: An Anthology.

Wild, J. (1948). Introduction to Realistic Philosophy.

Wilhelm, W. (1914). An Introduction to Philosophy.

Winch Peter. (1958). The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-22

How to Cite

Fatonah, F., Ismail, I. ., Adimarta, T. ., Sholiha, M. ., Darmansyah, R. ., Fardinal, F. ., Yanfaunnas, Y. ., Tunggal Prastetyo, B. ., & Gusmahansyah, R. . (2022). The Contribution Of The Philosophy Of Science In Research Science And Social Life. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 4(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v4i1.1401

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (September - October 2022)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS).