Collaborative Governance Regimes In The One Data Indonesia Forum of South Kalimantan Province

Authors

  • Muhamad Yose Rizal Lambung Mangkurat University, South Kalimantan, Indonesia
  • Budi Kristanto Lambung Mangkurat University, South Kalimantan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i3.6097

Keywords:

One Data Indonesia, Collaborative Governance, Collaborative Governance Regimes, South Kalimantan

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of collaborative governance in the operation of the One Data Indonesia (SDI) Forum of South Kalimantan Province using the Collaborative Governance Regime (CGR) approach. Employing a qualitative case study through interviews, documentation, and policy analysis, the study finds that collaboration within the SDI Forum is supported by an adaptive institutional structure, regulatory backing through Presidential Regulations, Governor Regulations, and Circular Letters, as well as facilitative leadership among stakeholders. The South Kalimantan SDI Forum has demonstrated positive achievements, including national recognition as 4th place in the 2022 provincial SDI evaluation and strengthening data governance through monthly and quarterly reporting. Interviews were conducted with five SDI administrators during July–October 2025. However, collaboration still faces challenges such as data system fragmentation, rotation of structural positions, and dependence on specific individuals. Based on CGR analysis, the Forum has fulfilled the principles of principled engagement, shared motivation, and capacity for joint action, but it is not yet fully institutionalized. The Forum is in a transitional phase from individually driven collaboration toward sustainable, system-based collaboration. This study contributes to refining the CGR model in the context of provincial government data governance in Indonesia.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 18(4), 543–571.

Azizah, Y., & Permana, I. (2023). Upaya koordinasi Satu Data Indonesia (SDI) di Kota Padang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 14(2), 101–112.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Danastry, A. G., & Kurniawan, T. (2021). Penerapan tata kelola kolaboratif dalam upaya penetrasi jaringan bergerak tetap (fixed broadband) di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Katharina, R., Nurdin, N., & Irawan, A. (2021). Kebijakan Satu Data Indonesia: Studi kasus Kota Bekasi dan Kota Tangerang. Publica Institute. https://publicabooks.ascarya.or.id/index.php/publica/catalog/book/106

Kusuma, A. D., & Wulandari, S. (2024). Collaborative governance dalam penyelenggaraan Satu Data Indonesia di Kabupaten Mempawah Provinsi Kalimantan Barat (Tesis). Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri. http://eprints.ipdn.ac.id/id/eprint/17130

Lestari, D., & Aryani, F. (2023). Implementasi kebijakan penyelenggaraan Satu Data Indonesia di Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung. Prosiding Diskusi Publik, 3(1), 45–56. Universitas Indo Global Mandiri. https://ejournal.uigm.ac.id/index.php/PDP/article/view/5266

Nugroho, S. S., Safitri, K. I., Syamsuadi, A., Syahrier, F. A., & Pratama, G. (2025). Collaborative governance dalam mitigasi abrasi di Kabupaten Bengkalis Provinsi Riau. Sumur Sosial Humaniora, 3(2).

Prihatiningsih, M. D., Deliarnoor, N. A., & Hermawati, R. (2024). Collaborative governance dalam mewujudkan Kota Singkawang sebagai Kota Tertoleran tahun 2023. Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 7(4), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v7i4.3496

Redman, T. C. (2016). The root cause of bad data. Harvard Business Review, 94(9), 84–92. https://hbr.org/2016/09/the-root-cause-of-bad-data

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif, dan konstruktif. Alfabeta.

Thompson, N., Ravindran, R., & Nicosia, S. (2015). Government data does not mean data governance: Lessons learned from a public sector application audit. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.001

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zannuba, L. A., Sahat-Satyawan, D., & Wijaya, S. S. (2024). Implementasi kebijakan Satu Data Indonesia pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Banyumas. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Kebijakan Publik, 11(1), 55–68.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-05

How to Cite

Rizal, M. Y., & Kristanto, B. (2026). Collaborative Governance Regimes In The One Data Indonesia Forum of South Kalimantan Province. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 7(3), 3340–3352. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i3.6097

Most read articles by the same author(s)