Optimizing Interactive Multimedia in Social Studies Learning Through the Application of POAC Management Functions in Junior High Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i3.6028Keywords:
Interactive multimedia, Social Studies learning, POAC management, Critical thinking, Junior high schoolAbstract
This study aims to describe the optimization of interactive multimedia in Social Studies (IPS) learning through the application of the POAC (Planning, Organizing, Actuating, Controlling) management functions at SMPN 187 Jakarta and SMPN 225 Jakarta. The research employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, then analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings show that teachers were able to plan multimedia use based on the characteristics of Social Studies content, organize learning tools and student role distribution, implement multimedia-based instruction that promotes analytical activity through videos, animations, and discussions, and conduct formative and summative evaluations to monitor students’ understanding. Interactive multimedia was found to enhance comprehension of abstract concepts, increase learning motivation, and foster students’ critical thinking and communication skills. This study affirms that successful multimedia integration heavily depends on teachers’ managerial competence and the availability of technological infrastructure in schools.References
Adrias, & Ruswandi, A. (2025). Desain penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan mix method. Rajawali Pers.
Al Adib, A., & Hasanah, N. (2023). Evaluasi program pembelajaran berbasis digital di sekolah menengah. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 12(2), 111–122.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2019). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. Longman.
Brame, C. J. (2016). Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/active-learning/
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy and practice. South African Journal of Education, 27(3), 391–406.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction (4th ed.). Wiley.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). Sage.
Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. ASCD.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review: Teacher learning—what matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2009). Professional learning communities at work. Solution Tree Press.
Emmer, E. T., & Sabornie, E. J. (2015). Handbook of classroom management. Routledge.
Fatimah, F., Ruslaini, R., & Sumarno, S. (2025). Analysis of principal managerial competence in Merdeka Curriculum implementation. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 44(1), 44–56.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., & Briggs, L. J. (2017). Principles of instructional design (6th ed.). Cengage.
Hallinger, P. (2020). Instructional leadership and learning. Routledge.
Haryanto, D. (2023). Media digital interaktif untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep IPS. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 7(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v7i1.51852
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (2019). Instructional media and technology for learning (12th ed.). Pearson.
Hughes, J., & López-Robles, J. (2023). Trustworthiness in case study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(4), 542–558.
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in classroom interaction. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267.
Kemdikbudristek. (2022). Pedoman implementasi pembelajaran berbasis digital. Kemdikbud RI.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Lin, C. H., Warschauer, M., & Blake, R. (2020). Digital collaborative learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 150, 103912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103912
Manurung, R. (2024). Multimedia berbasis gim untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar IPS. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran, 8(1), 22–33.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (3rd ed.). Sage.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Muller, J. (2018). Authentic assessment in digital era. Assessment Matters, 13(2), 52–67.
Mutlu-Bayraktar, D., Cosgun, V., & Altay, F. (2021). Digital visual tasks and critical thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106862
Nazir, M. (2021). Metode penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2018). Management (14th ed.). Pearson.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Susanto, A. (2021). Manajemen pembelajaran berbasis teknologi. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 77–91.
Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 713–715.
Syafrida, S. (2022). Pendekatan studi kasus dalam penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 15(2), 121–132.
Syahputra, H., & Aslami, N. (2023). Penerapan fungsi manajemen POAC. Jurnal Kepemimpinan Pendidikan, 5(1), 12–20.
Tondeur, J., et al. (2022). Strategic planning for technology integration. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(2), 485–499.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Wahyuni, S. (2024). Dampak multimedia interaktif terhadap motivasi belajar IPS. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, 11(1), 59–71.
Widiastuti, N., et al. (2024). Digital media in elementary IPS learning. Jurnal Sekolah Dasar, 14(2), 144–154.
Yuliana, N. (2024). Multimedia interaktif untuk konsep abstrak. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(1), 10–21
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elfita Nelda, Suharyanto H. Soro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).
