Beyond Bias and Culture: Exploring the Role of Sustainable Procurement Orientation in Vendor Selection and Procurement Performance in the Construction Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i3.6019Keywords:
Organizational Culture, Perceived Risk, Status Quo Bias, Sustainable Procurement, Procurement PerformanceAbstract
This study aims to examine the influence of Organisational Culture, Perceived Risk, Status Quo Bias, and Sustainable Procurement Orientation on Vendor Selection and Procurement Performance in the construction industry, and to assess the mediating role of Vendor Selection. A quantitative approach was applied using survey data from 112 employees involved in procurement activities at a construction company in Indonesia, and the data were analysed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modelling. All constructs met the criteria for reliability and both convergent and discriminant validity. Organizational Culture emerged as the strongest predictor of Vendor Selection and Procurement Performance, followed by Sustainable Procurement Orientation. Contrary to theoretical expectations, Perceived Risk and Status Quo Bias showed positive effects on Vendor Selection, indicating the strategic importance of caution and stability in high-risk construction environments. Vendor Selection significantly mediated all examined relationships. These findings enhance the understanding of behavioral dynamics in supply chains and sustainable procurement by demonstrating how psychological, cultural, and sustainability-oriented factors collectively shape vendor decision-making and influence procurement outcomes.References
Aduwo, E., Ibem, E., & Uwakonye, O. (2020). Evaluating supplier dynamics in construction project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3), 1–12.
Akbar, M. (2019). Organizational culture and procurement effectiveness. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 8(2), 44–52.
Akhtar, M., & Ahmad, I. (2021). A stochastic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making for sustainable vendor selection in the petroleum refining sector. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(6), 2103–2123.
Amann, M., Roehrich, J., Eßig, M., & Harland, C. (2021). Driving sustainable public procurement: Evidence from global supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108226.
Asamoah, D., Annan, J., & Baah, D. (2019). Status quo bias and public procurement compliance in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Procurement Management, 12(1), 15–32.
Baz, J., & Iddik, S. (2020). Culture and green supply chain management. Management of Environmental Quality, 31(2), 483–504.
Bolomope, A., Nwachukwu, S., & Chen, Z. (2022). Behavioural tendencies in vendor decision-making within construction supply chains. Journal of Procurement and Supply Strategy, 15(3), 221–235.
Chai, S., Li, X., & Wang, Z. (2020). Organizational culture and innovation in supplier evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 112, 85–95.
Choudhary, A., & Narayan, V. (2021). Supplier evaluation for construction supply chains under uncertainty. International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 45–60.
Cooper, M. (2024). The impact of cultural differences on global procurement: A qualitative study of multinational supply chains. Preprints, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.0694.v1
Damayanti, R., Sari, D., & Utami, L. (2022). Organizational culture and procurement performance in construction. Journal of Project Management Studies, 4(1), 77–88.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Papadopoulos, T. (2022). Technological innovation for sustainable procurement. Journal of Business Research, 145, 289–301.
Ershadi, M., et al. (2021). Achieving sustainable procurement in construction: Role of project management office. Construction Economics and Building, 21(1), 45–62.
Garvey, M., & Carnovale, S. (2020). The rippled newsvendor: Modelling supply chain risk propagation. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107752.
Godefroid, M., Plattfaut, R., & Niehaves, B. (2022). How to measure status quo bias? Management Review Quarterly, 73(4), 1667–1711.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
Hartnell, C. A., Ou, A. Y., & Kinicki, A. (2019). Organizational values and effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(9), 1134–1160.
Imafuku, K., Tanaka, A., & Sato, H. (2022). Experience-driven supplier selection in Japanese construction firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Construction Management, 9(1), 23–36.
Ibrahim, R., Mansor, N., & Omar, A. (2022). Supplier performance risks in construction procurement. International Journal of Project Management, 40(6), 523–534.
Jahani, A., & Amini, A. (2021). Industry 4.0 in procurement: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(15), 7520.
John, D., Mensah, P., & Amoako, R. (2023). Risk perception and supplier evaluation. Journal of Supply Chain Management Research, 17(2), 55–70.
Kahn, B. E., Moore, W., & Glazer, R. (2014). Status quo bias in supplier selection. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 478–484.
Kellner, F., & Utz, S. (2019). Sustainability in supplier selection and allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 885–896.
Li, Y., Chen, H., & Fang, Q. (2023). Cultural determinants of procurement decision quality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 189–204.
Liao, C., Zhang, C., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Applications of status quo bias in organizational settings. Highlights in Business Economics and Management, 21, 82–88.
Mahajan, R., Singh, R., & Rao, P. (2023). Vendor selection and procurement outcomes. International Journal of Supply Chain Strategy, 12(1), 41–55.
Maulana, R., Idris, S., & Amin, F. (2024). Drivers of sustainable procurement practices. ICMRSI Proceedings, 1, 832.
Nyamah, E., Feng, Y., & Opoku, R. (2022). Procurement process risk and supplier relationships. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(1), 75–101.
Olaleye, D., Olatunji, O., & Akinlo, O. (2024). Data-driven cost reduction and vendor management. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 12(2), 192–203.
Pandiangan, A., Siregar, R., & Napitupulu, H. (2024). Organizational culture and employee decision quality. International Journal of Business Law and Education, 5(1), 120–134.
Perera, B., Nanayakkara, S., & Karunaratne, T. (2020). Behavioural dimensions of supplier selection. Construction Supply Chain Review, 9(3), 14–28.
Reynolds, S. (2024). Sustainable procurement practices: Supplier selection criteria. Preprints, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0548.v1
Riadi, M., & Machfudiyanto, S. (2023). Sustainable procurement and performance in construction projects. E3S Web of Conferences, 405, 04023.
Sari, D., & Nuzul, A. (2022). Vendor selection and procurement performance. Journal of Supply Chain Studies, 8(3), 101–116.
Sukardi, A., & Abduh, M. (2019). Sustainable procurement in Indonesian construction. MATEC Web of Conferences, 270, 05009.
Testa, F., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2020). Drivers of green procurement practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118573.
Tembo, T., Banda, P., & Sikaluma, B. (2023). Behavioural factors in construction supplier decisions. Journal of Construction Supply Chain Studies, 15(2), 33–49.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.
Walker, H., & Jones, N. (2022). Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Construction. Springer.
Zhang, W., & Chen, L. (2022). Understanding status quo bias in supplier decisions. International Journal of Decision Sciences, 27(4), 411–425.
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2023). Collaboration-based green supply chain management in construction. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 36, 412–426.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gemmi Puspa Wijayanti Irianto, Agus Purnomo, Melia Eka Setiani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).









































