Transforming Freelance Designers in the Digital Creative Economy through AI Visual Prompting

Authors

  • Haesal Haesal Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
  • Btari Mariska Purwaamijaya Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Dzikri Ar Ridlo Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i2.5827

Keywords:

AI visual prompt, Freelance Designer, Phenomenology, Creative Identity, Digital Creative Economy

Abstract

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as Midjourney, DALL·E, and Stable Diffusion has fundamentally transformed the creative industry, particularly the freelance design sector. This study aims to explore how Indonesian freelance designers reinterpret their professional identity amid AI integration. Using a qualitative phenomenological design through Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) combined with Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the research involved six freelance designers who actively use AI visual prompt tools in their work. The findings reveal a paradoxical dynamic: AI serves as an efficiency catalyst while simultaneously generating emotional and professional tension. Designers respond to this disruption through three strategies; embracing AI as a collaborative accelerator, reaffirming the irreplaceable value of human creativity, and adopting adaptive economic strategies to maintain relevance in the gig economy. The study concludes that AI does not replace designers but repositions them as strategic mediators who combine technical literacy, critical reflection, and artistic intuition. These insights contribute to design research by illuminating how creative professionals renegotiate value and authorship in the digital creative economy. 

References

Akkermans, H. (2023). The social responsibilities of scientists and technologists in the digital age. In Introduction to Digital Humanism: A Textbook. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45304-5_5

Alam, T. Z., & Haikal, J. (2024). Dampak Produksi Desain Grafis Pada Penggunaan Teknologi Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dengan Menggunakan Grounded Theory. Jurnal Seni Nasional Cikini, 10(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.52969/jsnc.v10i1.265

Billingsley, W. (2025). The Practical Epistemologies of Design and Artificial Intelligence. Science and Education, 34(2), 807–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00517-z

Bisnis.com. (2025). AI makin masif, Sribu.com singgung dampak ke jasa freelancer. In Bisnis.com. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20250422/12/1871154/ai-makin-masif-sribucom-singgung-dampak-ke-jasa-freelancer

Bullini Orlandi, L., Pocek, J., Kraus, S., Zardini, A., & Rossignoli, C. (2024). Digital workers’ stress: The role of digital creativity in the future jobs. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(2), 100492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100492

Crowston, K., & Bolici, F. (2025). Deskilling and upskilling with AI systems. Information Research, 30(iConf (2025)), 1009–1023. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30iConf47143

Demirel, P., Nemkova, E., & Taylor, R. (2021). Reproducing Global Inequalities in the Online Labour Market: Valuing Capital in the Design Field. Work, Employment and Society, 35(5), 914–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020942447

Erickson, K. (2024). AI and work in the creative industries: digital continuity or discontinuity? Creative Industries Journal, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2024.2421135

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368

Forum, W. E. (2023). Future of Jobs Report 2023. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023

Fuchs, C. (2024). Critical Theory Foundations of Digital Capitalism: A Critical Political Economy Perspective. TripleC, 22(1), 148–196. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v22i1.1454

Gao, Z., & Huang, J. (2022). Human-computer interaction emotional design and innovative cultural and creative product design. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(September), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.982303

Gill, Rosalind, & Pratt, Andy. (2008). In the Social Factory?: Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097794

Günay, M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Originality in Design. ART/Icle: Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 4(3), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.56590/stdarticle.1548924

Heigl, R. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in creative contexts: a systematic review and future research agenda. In Management Review Quarterly (Issue 0123456789). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00494-9

Jia, M., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, X. (2025). Will potential threats persist? Attitudes and behavioral responses of creative professionals toward GenAI. Information Research, 30(iConf (2025)), 1073–1083. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30iConf47098

Jiang, W., Li, Y., Hu, X., & Ma, D. (2025). Reframing individual roles in collaboration: digital identity construction and adaptive mechanisms for resistance-based professional skills in AI-human intelligence symbiosis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1652130

Jussupow, E., Spohrer, K., & Heinzl, A. (2022). Identity Threats as a Reason for Resistance to Artificial Intelligence: Survey Study With Medical Students and Professionals. JMIR Formative Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/28750

Katadata. (2024). Nilai PDB ekonomi kreatif Indonesia meningkat usai pandemi. In Databoks Katadata. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/infografik/2024/04/29/nilai-pdb-ekonomi-kreatif-indonesia-meningkat-usai-pandemi

Knochel, A. D. (2023). Midjourney Killed the Photoshop Star: Assembling the Emerging Field of Synthography. Studies in Art Education, 64(4), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2023.2255085

Kudless, Andrew. (2023). Hierarchies of bias in artificial intelligence architecture: Collective, computational, and cognitive. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 21(2), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771231170272

Lee, S., Law, M., & Hoffman, G. (2025). When and How to Use AI in the Design Process? Implications for Human-AI Design Collaboration. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1569–1584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2353451

Lestari, S. D., & Mun’im, A. (2022). Mengukur Kinerja Ekonomi Kreatif Indonesia. Jurnal DPR RI, 27(2), 209–221.

Li, H., Xue, T., Zhang, A., Luo, X., Kong, L., & Huang, G. (2024). The application and impact of artificial intelligence technology in graphic design: A critical interpretive synthesis. Heliyon, 10(21), e40037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40037

Li, J., Cao, H., Lin, L., Hou, Y., Zhu, R., & Ali, A. El. (2024). User Experience Design Professionals’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings . https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642114

McCosker, A., & Wilken, R. (2020). Automating Vision: The Social Impact of the New Camera Consciousness (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429341175

Messer, U. (2024). Co-creating art with generative artificial intelligence: Implications for artworks and artists. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100056

Mufid, L. P. P. (2023). Dampak Otomatisasi Artificial Intelligence dalam Pekerjaan Desain Grafis : Analisis Peran Artificial Intelligence pada Desainer Grafis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IKJ 2023, 62–69.

Naclerio, E. (2023). Self-entrepreneurship in uncertain futures: The case of performing artists in Italy. International Sociology, 38(1), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809221139111

Öztaş, Y. E., & Arda, B. (2025). Re-evaluating creative labor in the age of artificial intelligence: a qualitative case study of creative workers’ perspectives on technological transformation in creative industries. AI and Society, 40(5), 4119–4130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02180-6

Paananen, V., Oppenlaender, J., & Visuri, A. (2024). Using text-to-image generation for architectural design ideation. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 22(3), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771231222783

Patton, M. Q. T. A.-T. T.-. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4 NV-1). SAGE Publications US. https://doi.org/LK - https://worldcat.org/title/1205201059

Santiago, J. M., Sendner, M., Ralser, D., & Meschtscherjakov, A. (2025). The AI of Oz: A Conceptual Framework for Democratizing Generative AI in Live-Prototyping User Studies. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105506

Scott, R. M. G. (2025). Supererogatory consumer choices grounded in the human right to privacy. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 33(May), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaf010

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. SAGE.

Suchman, L. (2006). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. In Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808418

Takafoli, M., Li, S., & Mäkelä, V. (2024). Generative AI in User Experience Design and Research: How Do UX Practitioners, Teams, and Companies Use GenAI in Industry? Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS 2024, 1579–1593. https://doi.org/10.1145/3643834.3660720

Wei, X., Wang, L., Lee, L. K., & Liu, R. (2025). The effects of generative AI on collaborative problem-solving and team creativity performance in digital story creation: an experimental study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00526-0

Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616

Zhou, E., & Lee, D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art. PNAS Nexus, 3(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae052

Zhu, Z., Lee, H., Pan, Y., & Cai, P. (2024). AI assistance in enterprise UX design workflows: enhancing design brief creation for designers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1404647

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Haesal, H., Purwaamijaya, B. M., & Ar Ridlo, M. D. (2025). Transforming Freelance Designers in the Digital Creative Economy through AI Visual Prompting. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 7(2), 2101–2113. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i2.5827

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science (December 2025 - January 2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Haesal Haesal, Btari Mariska Purwaamijaya, Muhammad Dzikri Ar Ridlo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).