Improving the Performance of Batik Craft MSMEs in Jambi City Through a Comparative Advantage Strategy Using the House Model Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v7i2.5731Keywords:
The House Model, Comparative Advantage, Strategy, Performance, MSMEsAbstract
As a country that has various types of creative industries such as the batik craft industry. Batik should be able to become one of the business fields that can support the economy (Nengsih et al., 2021). This is also what makes the government serious in managing batik crafts so that they can be used as superior products. The Jambi Batik industry is currently shrinking, one of the reasons is that most of the Jambi patterned batik circulating in the market is supplied from Java. This causes the price of Javanese Jambi batik to be more popular with the public because the price is cheaper. One of the strategies that can be applied to improve the performance of MSMEs is through the Comparative Advantage approach (Porter, 1985). This strategy emphasizes the use of competitive advantages possessed by MSMEs in order to compete effectively in the market (Suryana A, Kartika R, 2022). To support the implementation of the Comparative Advantage strategy, this study adopts The House Model approach, which is a business development model based on competitive advantage. The House Model consists of several main elements, such as a strong business foundation, innovation strategy, resource management, and the role of stakeholders in supporting business growth (Nengsih et al, 2021 and Schmitz, 2007). The results of this study show that Jambi batik crafts can develop and compete with crafts in other batik centers by utilizing local and innovative materials to improve the quality and added value of Jambi batik, so that the results of these batik products have their own characteristics. Furthermore, from the Marketing side, it must also be based on local identity by not forgetting the use of digitalization to open up access to the global market.
References
Tambunan, I. 2011. Ketika Batik Jambi Mengalami “Booming”. (http://nasional.kompas.com/read/ 2011/04/01/04373767/, diakses 12 Juli 2011).
Rahayu, N. & Putri S. 2010. Rancangan Perbaikan Kualitas Produk Batik Solo Dengan Menerap-kan Model Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Skripsi Tidak Dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Uni-versitas Airlangga.
Tambunan T. Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah di Indonesia: Isu-isu Penting. Jakarta: LP3ES; 2019.
Kusnadi D. Strategi Peningkatan Daya Saing UMKM dalam Era Digital. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2020.
Mulia IP, Evrina, Efandri A, Indah M. Efektivitas Bantuan Pemerintah Melalui Akses Permodalan Bank 9 Jambi Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kinerja UMKM Menuju Digitalisasi. J Ekon Manaj Sist Inform. 2024;6(2):543-9. doi:10.38035/jemsi.v6i2.3122.
Porter ME. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press; 1985.
Suryana A, Kartika R. Analisis Keunggulan Komparatif pada UMKM dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Digital. J Manaj Kewirausahaan. 2022;15(1):98-112.
Nengsih TA, Minarsi A, Ismail M. Unggul Bersaing Batik Jambi: Studi Batik Berkah Jambi. J Manaj Sains. 2021;6(2):506-10. doi:10.33087/jmas.v6i2.290.
Schmitz H. Reducing Complexity in Comparative Advantage Models. J Econ Perspect. 2007;21(3):45-66.
Rahman F, Utami W. Implementasi The House Model dalam Meningkatkan Daya Saing UMKM Berbasis Lokal. J Strateg Bisnis. 2023;8(3):210-25.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2017.
Ziliwu GEK, Simanjuntak M. Analisis Peningkatan Kinerja UMKM Kuliner Destinasi Wisata Melalui Strategi Comparative Advantage dengan Pendekatan The House Model Studi Empiris Toba Indonesia. 2021:104-19.
Dewi RMNSP, Utami NR, Vania FBP. Analisis Pengaruh Comparative Advantage Terhadap Daya Tarik Wisata Gerabah Desa Wisata Kasongan Yogyakarta. Pariwisata. 2023;10(1). Available from: http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/jp.
Syukriah A, Hamdani I. Peningkatan Eksistensi UMKM Melalui Comparative Advantage Dalam Rangka Menghadapi MEA 2015 di Temanggung. Econ Dev Anal J. 2013;2(2):110-9. doi:10.15294/edaj.v2i2.1395.
Yusdja Y. Tinjauan teori perdagangan internasional dan keunggulan kooperatif. Forum Penelit Agro Ekon. 2004;22(2):126-41. Available from: https://fae.perhepi.org.
Ghaithi AK Al, Kattiparuthi RA, Koya AM. Delay Analysis in EPC Projects using Ishikawa Diagram. Int J Adv Eng Manag Sci. 2017. doi:10.24001/ijaems.3.7.7.
Widyahening CET. Penggunaan Teknik Pembelajaran Fishbone Diagram. J Komun Pendidik. 2018.
Wahyuningrum P, Sukmawati A, Kartika L. Peningkatan Kinerja Usaha Kecil dan Menengah (UKM) Kluster Kerajinan di Kota Depok Menggunakan The House Model. J Manaj Organ. 2016. doi:10.29244/jmo.v5i2.12156.
Cordell A, Thompson I. Force Field Analysis. In: The Procurement Models Handbook. 2019. doi:10.4324/9781351239509-51.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mulia Inda Purawati, A. Rozi, Efandri Agustian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).
