Building Digital Identity Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Three Countries' Approaches

Authors

  • Shelina Fransiosa Postgraduate Program in Administrative Science, Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Laode Rudita Postgraduate Program in Administrative Science, Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i6.5021

Keywords:

Digital Identity, Aadhaar, eIDAS, IKD, Data Protection, Digital Literacy, Governance, National System

Abstract

This study aims to analyze strategies for developing national digital identity systems using a systematic literature review (SLR) approach by comparing practices in three countries: India, Estonia, and Indonesia. Eight recent scholarly articles were reviewed to identify each study's research objectives, methods, key variables, findings, and limitations. The analysis reveals that India stands out in terms of system coverage and scalability through Aadhaar, but faces serious challenges in data protection and audit mechanisms. Estonia has successfully developed a legal, secure, and publicly trusted digital identity system by integrating the GDPR and eIDAS frameworks. Meanwhile, Indonesia is in the early stages of developing its Digital Population Identity (IKD), facing various obstacles such as infrastructure disparities, low digital literacy, and suboptimal regulatory governance and inter-agency coordination. The study concludes that the development of digital identity systems depends not only on technology but also on policy integration, public participation, and institutional readiness. Strategic recommendations include strengthening data protection regulations, building inclusive digital infrastructure, enhancing human resource capacity, and formulating a national digital literacy

References

Anisa Juliastuty Cahyaningrum dan Mirzam Arqy Ahmadi. 2024. “Analisis Pengaruh Struktur Modal, Profitabilitas, dan Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan (Systematic Literature Review).” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Manajemen & Bisnis 2 (4): 214–22. https://doi.org/10.60023/4ynr9k78.

Anand, A. (2021). New Principles for Governing Aadhaar. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 18(1). https://www.sciencepolicyjournal.org/uploads/5/4/3/4/5434385/anand_jspg_18.1.pdf

Chowdhry, R., Das, S., & Jha, P. (2021). Digital Identity in India: A Decade of Aadhaar. Indian School of Business. https://eprints.exchange.isb.edu/id/eprint/1799/

European Commission. (2023). Emerging Era of Digital Identities: Challenges and Opportunities for the G20. Asian Development Bank Institute. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/822681/adbi-brief-emerging-era-digital-identities-challenges-and-opportunities-g20.pdf

Gustiana, A., & Pohan, M. (2024). Efektivitas IKD dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Kependudukan di Serdang Bedagai. JIMAT: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59653/jimat.v2i01.460

Nurhalimah, I., Ramdani, R., & Syahputra, D. (2023). Tantangan dan Strategi Pemerintah dalam Implementasi Identitas Digital Nasional. Jurnal Transformasi Digital, 5(1), 12–25. https://ejournal.stmikkomputama.ac.id/index.php/jtd/article/view/456

Pandey, P., & Chaubey, D. S. (2021). Digital Identity and Its Link to Socioeconomic Inclusion. Government Information Quarterly. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/446350/1/GIQ_AadhaarDigitalIdentityandInclusion.pdf

Setiawan, R., & Gunawan, D. (2022). Evaluasi Implementasi Identitas Kependudukan Digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, 3(2), 45–54. https://jurnal.unikal.ac.id/index.php/JTSI/article/view/2894

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model?: how to evaluate to improvement.

Surat Edaran Nomor 400.12/484/DKPS-PDG/2024. (n.d.). Instagram. Retrieved June 13, 2025, from https://www.instagram.com/p/DDefXbySI8h/

Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24. (2013). UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2013. https://www.kemhan.go.id/ppid/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/10/UU-24-Tahun-2013.pdf

UNDP. (2018). United Nations Strategy for Legal Identity for All.

UNFPA. (2020). UNFPA Indonesia | BPS Introduces Innovative Approach to Population Census. https://indonesia.unfpa.org/en/news/bps-introduces-innovative-approach-population-census?utm_source=chatgpt.com

United Nation. (2016). Target 16.9 - SDG16NOW. https://sdg16now.org/report/target16-9/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Van Meter, D. S. , & V. H. C. E. (1975). The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Wati, V. C., Charunia Wati, V., Walza Rizkita, T., Sajiwa, B., Silawarti, R., & Prasetyo, E. (2024). Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Go Digital pada Identitas Kependudukan Digital (IKD) dalam Perspektif Dynamic Governance di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Tangerang. Public Service and Governance Journal, 5(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.56444/PSGJ.V5I2.1806

World Bank. (2019a). A N N U A L R E P O R T.

World Bank. (2019b). Inclusive and Trusted Digital ID Can Unlock Opportunities for the World’s Most Vulnerable. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/immersive-story/2019/08/14/inclusive-and-trusted-digital-id-can-unlock-opportunities-for-the-worlds-most-vulnerable?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Yonatan, A., Ramadhan, I., & Herlambang, R. (2024). Pemanfaatan Identitas Kependudukan Digital (IKD) dalam Peningkatan Pelayanan Publik. JSER: Journal of Social and Education Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.54783/jser.v6i1.400

Downloads

Published

2025-08-26

How to Cite

Fransiosa, S., & Rudita, L. . (2025). Building Digital Identity Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Three Countries’ Approaches . Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 6(6), 4972–4978. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i6.5021