Strengthening Innovation Culture In A Mining Company's Transformation In Indonesia

Authors

  • Najib Arangi Panjah Master of Business Administration Study Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Achmad Fajar Hendarman Master of Business Administration Study Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i6.4804

Keywords:

Innovation Culture, Innovation Quotient, Corporate Innovation, Mining Industry

Abstract

Innovation is a key driver of competitiveness and sustainability, particularly for industries undergoing strategic transformation. This study explores organizational innovation culture using a mixed-method approach, integrating quantitative assessment and qualitative insights. The Innovation Quotient (IQ), which comprises six building blocks : values, behaviors, climate, resources, processes, and success; served as the primary assessment framework. Data were collected through surveys and semi-structured interviews across various organizational levels. Findings reveal strengths in areas such as corporate values and internal collaboration. However, gaps were identified in leadership behaviors supporting innovation, resource allocation, and the absence of formalized innovation processes. These shortcomings suggest critical barriers to institutionalizing innovation. The research assumes that corporate culture significantly influences innovation outcomes, and that systematic evaluation can yield actionable insights. This research assumes that organizational culture influences innovation outcomes and that systematic evaluation can identify practical improvements. It contributes to both academic and managerial perspectives by applying the IQ model in the mining industry. Practical recommendations include developing structured innovation leadership programs, allocating dedicated innovation resources, and embedding innovation metrics into strategic planning. These actions aim to foster a more adaptive and innovation-conducive organizational culture.

References

Balci, M., & Kumral, M. (2022). Building an innovation strategy and culture on the structural characteristics of the mining industries. Resources Policy, 78, 102936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102936

Barnewold, L., & Lottermoser, B. G. (2020). Identification of digital technologies and digitalisation trends in the mining industry. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 30(6), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.07.003

Brettel, M., & Cleven, N. J. (2011). Innovation Culture, Collaboration with External Partners and NPD Performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(4), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00617.x

Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2022). Challenges of the polish coal mining industry on its way to innovative and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 375, 134061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134061

Chang, S.-Y., Lu, H.-P., & Liang, C.-J. (2013). A Teaching Case Study: Innovation, Product Development, and Organizational Transformation at the Sunnic Group. International Journal of Innovation Science, 5(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1260/1757-2223.5.1.45

Chen, W.-J. (2011). Innovation in hotel services: Culture and personality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.07.006

Danks, S., Rao, J., & Allen, J. M. (2017). Measuring Culture of Innovation: A Validation Study of the Innovation Quotient Instrument (Part 2): Measuring Culture of Innovation. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 30(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21241

Deloitte. (2024). Tracking The Trends 2024 : Navigating global challenges and Opportunities in mining and metals.

Dobni, C. B. (2008). Measuring innovation culture in organizations: The development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060810911156

Enzing, C. M., Batterink, M. H., Janszen, F. H. A., & Omta, S. W. F. (Onno). (2011). Where innovation processes make a difference in products’ short? and long?term market success. British Food Journal, 113(7), 812–837. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701111148379

Deloitte. (2024). Tracking The Trends 2024 : Navigating global challenges and Opportunities in mining and metals.

E&Y. (2022). Top 10 Business risks and opportunities for mining and metals in 2023.

Hendarman, A.F., Cantner, U. Soft skills, hard skills, and individual innovativeness. Eurasian Bus Rev 8, 139–169 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-017-0076-6

Herrmann, A., Gassmann, O., & Eisert, U. (2007). An empirical study of the antecedents for radical product innovations and capabilities for transformation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1–2), 92–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.006

Hofman, B., De Vries, G., & Van De Kaa, G. (2022). Keeping Things as They Are: How Status Quo Biases and Traditions along with a Lack of Information Transparency in the Building Industry Slow Down the Adoption of Innovative Sustainable Technologies. Sustainability, 14(13), 8188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138188

Juergensen, J., Narula, R., & Surdu, I. (2024). International business and organizational innovation: An agenda for future research. Multinational Business Review, 32(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-11-2023-0182

Kazanin, O., Sidorenko, A., & Drebenstedt, C. (2021). Intensive underground mining technologies: Challenges and prospects for the coal mines in Russia. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 26, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v26i1.05

Lath, Vivek & Peacocke, Greg. (2020). How digital innovation will transform Indonesia’s mining industry, McKinsey & Company

Lay, J., Wiewiora, A., Kashan, A. J., & Bradley, L. (2022). Operationalising a process model of innovation for the mining industry. Resources Policy, 79, 102988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102988

Le, P. B. (2020). How transformational leadership facilitates radical and incremental innovation: The mediating role of individual psychological capital. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 12(3/4), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-04-2020-0129

Mahmood, A., Arshad Ali, A., Nazam, M., & Nazim, M. (2021). Developing an interplay among the psychological barriers for the adoption of industry 4.0 phenomenon. PLOS ONE, 16(8), e0255115. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255115

Naranjo Valencia, J. C., Sanz Valle, R., & Jiménez Jiménez, D. (2010). Organizational culture as determinant of product innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061011086294

Naranjo?Valencia, J. C., Jiménez?Jiménez, D., & Sanz?Valle, R. (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Management Decision, 49(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111094437

O’Cass, A., & Viet Ngo, L. (2007). Market orientation versus innovative culture: Two routes to superior brand performance. European Journal of Marketing, 41(7/8), 868–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710752438

Panuwatwanich, K., Stewart, R. A., & Mohamed, S. (2009). Validation of an empirical model for innovation diffusion in Australian design firms. Construction Innovation, 9(4), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170910995976

Rao , J. , & Weintraub , J. ( 2013 ). How innovative is your company ’ s culture?, MIT Sloan Management Review , 54 ( 3 ), 28 – 37 .

Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Building a Climate for Innovation Through Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051808324100

Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2013). Facilitating innovation capability through performance measurement: A study of Finnish SMEs. Management Research Review, 36(10), 991–1010. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11-2011-0252

Singh, R. K., Kumar, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & De Sá, M. M. (2020). Managing operations for circular economy in the mining sector: An analysis of barriers intensity. Resources Policy, 69, 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101752

Singh, S., & Aggarwal, Y. (2022). In search of a consensus definition of innovation: A qualitative synthesis of 208 definitions using grounded theory approach. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1925526

Slater, S. F., Mohr, J. J., & Sengupta, S. (2014). Radical Product Innovation Capability: Literature Review, Synthesis, and Illustrative Research Propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12113

Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. C., & Chandy, R. K. (2009). Radical Innovation across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.003

Varadarajan, R. (2024). Mitigating the definitional quagmire in innovation research: AN inclusive definition of innovation as a template for defining various types of innovations uniformly. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 41(4), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12729

Velasco, E., Zamanillo, I., & Del Valle, T. G. (2013). Mobilizing Company Members’ Full Innovative Potential. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(6), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20341

Downloads

Published

2025-08-19

How to Cite

Panjah, N. A., & Hendarman, A. F. (2025). Strengthening Innovation Culture In A Mining Company’s Transformation In Indonesia. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 6(6), 4667–4681. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i6.4804

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 6 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (August - September 2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Najib Arangi Panjah, Achmad Fajar Hendarman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (DIJEMSS).