Implementation of Student Centered Approach (SCA) with Station Rotation Learning Model to Support 21st Century Learning

Authors

  • Ervan Dwi Yuliaristiawan FIP Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia
  • Henry Praherdhiono FIP Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia
  • Ence Surahman FIP Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i4.4427

Keywords:

Student-Centered Approach, Station Rotation, 21st century learning

Abstract

The Student-Centered Approach (SCA) is the basis for designing learning to equip learners with 21st century skills. One model that supports SCA is Station Rotation, which allows personalization of learning by dividing the class into stations with different activities. This research uses a systematic review of studies to analyze the impact of implementing Station Rotation in classroom learning. The results show that this model positively contributes to students' cognitive learning outcomes, critical thinking skills, collaboration, and learning motivation. This model can be applied at various levels of education, but needs to be combined with other learning strategies to be more optimal.

References

Akinoso, S. O., Alabi, O. M., & Agoro, A. A. (2021). Effect of station rotation mode of instructional delivery for mathematics in the era of advancing technology. Journal of International Society for Science and Engineering, 24(2), 60-72. ir.bowen.edu.ng:8181/jspui/handle/123456789/1475

Anggraena, Y., Felicia, N., Ginanto, D. E., Pratiwi, I., Utama, B., Alhapip, L., & Widiaswati, D. (2021). Kajian Akademik Kurikulum untuk Pemulihan Pembelajaran. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/24972/

Ayob, N. F. S., Abd Halim, N. D., & Zulkifli, N. N. (2020). Effect of blended learning using the station rotation model towards students’ achievement in learning chemistry. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal (ITLJ), 4(1), 29-40.

Belazi, N., & Ganapathy, M. (2021). The Effects of the Station Rotation Model in Promoting Libyan Students’ EFL Writing: Blended Learning. AJELP: Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 9(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol9.1.10.2021

Candra, P. N., Soepriyanto, Y., & Praherdhiono, H. (2020). Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) guru dalam pengembangan dan implementasi rencana pembelajaran. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 3(2), 166-177.

Dos Santos, L. S., Benevides, R. G., Amorim, C. R., Santos, R. M., de Oliveira, S. S., & Granjeiro, É. M. (2021). Innovation in the teaching of human physiology at university and school: pedagogical process based on interdisciplinarity and learning station rotation. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(3), 541-546. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00154.2020

Elviya, D. D., & Sukartiningsih, W. (2023). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi dalam Kurikulum Merdeka pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar di SDN Lakarsantri I/472 Surabaya. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-penelitian-pgsd/article/view/54127

Ferlianti, S., Mu’iz, M. S., & Chandra, D. T. (2022). Metode Blended Learning Station Rotation Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta didik Pada Materi Tekanan Hidrostatis. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(3), 266–272. https://japendi.publikasiindonesia.id/index.php/japendi/article/view/625

Fulbeck, E., Atchison, D., Giffin, J., Seidel, D., & Eccleston, M. (2020). Personalizing Student Learning with Station rotation: A Descriptive Study. American Institutes for Research.

Hadiprayitno, G., Kusmiyati, K., Lestari, A., Lukitasari, M., & Sukri, A. (2021). Blended Learning Station-Rotation Model: Does it Impact on Preservice Teachers' Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 317-324. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.676

Hamida, N., Mustaji, F. A., & Hartono, S. (2021). The effect of station rotation online model on problem solving students ability: A case study at junior high school. Rigeo, 11(10).

Haseski, H. I., Ilic, U., & Tugtekin, U. (2018). Defining a New 21st Century Skill-Computational Thinking: Concepts and Trends. International Education Studies, 11(4), 29. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n4p29

Hidayati, N., Zubaidah, S., Suarsini, E., & Praherdhiono, H. (2020). The relationship between critical thinking and knowledge acquisition: The role of digital mind maps-PBL strategies. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(2), 140-145.

Indarta, Y., Jalinus, N., Waskito, W., Samala, A. D., Riyanda, A. R., & Adi, N. H. (2022). Relevansi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dengan Model Pembelajaran Abad 21 dalam Perkembangan Era Society 5.0. Edukatif?: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 3011–3024. https://doi.org/10.31004/EDUKATIF.V4I2.2589

Jojor, A., & Sihotang, H. (2022). Analisis Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Mengatasi Learning Loss di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Analisis Studi Kasus Kebijakan Pendidikan). Edukatif?: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 5150–5161. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3106

Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009, Januari). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 51, hlm. 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009

Larsari, V. N., Dhuli, R., & Chenari, H. (2023). Station rotation Model of Blended Learning as Generative Technology in Education: An Evidence-Based Research. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 668 LNNS, 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29857-8_45

Oktarianto Lutfi, M., Hidayat, A.,., A. G., & Wayan Dasna, I. (2023). The Effect of Station Rotation Learning Model on Critical Thinking in Elementary School-level Students. KnE Social Sciences, 8(8), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i8.13292

Mamman, B., Abuhassna, H., Umara, K., Mustapha, A. M., Awae, F., Ali, A. S., Radzi, M. B. P., Alshehhi, A.M. A. A., Almheiri, A. S. B. H. (2022). Pre-Service Teachers’ Views on How the Station Rotation Model with a Blended Social Learning Environment (SRM-BSCLE) Enhances their Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 11(2), 1298 - 1334. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/14134

Marlina, M., Kusumastuti, G., Makmur, N. A., & Nabila, I. (2022). Peningkatan keterampilan sosial anak berkebutuhan khusus melalui strategi pembelajaran station rotation berbasis tiered task (studi eksperimen di sekolah inklusif Sumatera Barat). JPK (Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus), 18(1), 31-42.

Morgan, H. (2014). Maximizing Student Success with Differentiated Learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2013.832130

Nugraha D.P., D. M. (2021). Station Rotation Type Blended Learning Model Against Critical Thinking Ability of Fourth Grade Students. Journal of Education Technology, 4(4), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i4.29690

Praherdhiono, H., Setyosari, P., Degeng, I. N. S., Slamet, T. I., Surahman, E., Adi, E. P., ... & Abidin, Z. (2019). Teori dan Implementasi Teknologi Pendidikan: Era Belajar Abad 21 dan Revolusi Industri 4.0. Seribu Bintang.

Rahmah, A. E., & Sukmara, R. (2022). Penerapan Model Blended Learning Tipe Station Rotation dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis Kalimat Bahasa Jepang Mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang Semester 4 FKIP UHAMKA. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 5(1), 106-126.

Regina Putri Novia Rani, P., Asbari, M., Dandi Ananta, V., & Alim, I. (2023). Kurikulum Merdeka: Transformasi Pembelajaran yang Relevan, Sederhana, dan Fleksibel. Journal of Information Systems and Management, 02(06). https://jisma.org

Safarati, N., & Zuhra, F. (2023). Literature review: Pembelajaran berdiferensiasi di sekolah menengah. Jurnal genta mulia, 14(1).

Surahman, E., Kuswandi, D., Wedi, A., Degeng, I. N. S., Setyanti, D. A., & Thaariq, Z. Z. A. (2019). Adaptive learning analytics management system (Alams): An innovative online learning approach. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(4), 413-430.

Syar, N. I. (2020). The Analysis of Logical Operation Ability of Senior High School Students on Physics Subject at Formal Operational Phase. Jurnal Pedagogik, 07(02). https://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/pedagogik

Tanggur, F. S. (2023). Tantangan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Bagi Guru Sekolah Dasar Di Wilayah Pedesaan Pulau Sumba. Hinef?: Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(2), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.37792/HINEF.V2I2.993

Tyabaev, A. E., Sedelnikova, S. F., & Voytovich, A. V. (2015). Student-Centered Learning: The Experience of Teaching International Students in Russian Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.578

Xiangze, Zhao and Abdullah, Zaleha, Station Rotation with Gamification Approach to Increase Students’ Engagement in Learning English Online (August 8, 2023). Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 9. July 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4534571

Downloads

Published

2025-04-24

How to Cite

Yuliaristiawan, E. D., Praherdhiono, H. ., & Surahman, . E. . (2025). Implementation of Student Centered Approach (SCA) with Station Rotation Learning Model to Support 21st Century Learning. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 6(4), 3173–3181. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i4.4427