Implementation of a Fun School Movement Program in Singkawang City

Azizah Azizah; Dede Sri Kartini; Rahman Mulyawan

doi:10.38035/dijemss.v6i3.3965

Authors

Azizah Azizah Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Dede Sri Kartini Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Rahman Mulyawan Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i3.3965

Keywords:

fun school movement, policy implementation, education policy

Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe and analyze the implementation of the seven-steps of fun school movement in Singkawang City as a means to improve the quality of basic education in Singkawang City. The analysis was conducted using Merilee S. Grindle's policy implementation theory, which includes content and context variables. This study employed a descriptive qualitative method with an inductive approach. Data collection techniques included observation, interviews, and document studies. The results showed that the the seven-step fun school movement has accommodated the interests of all target groups, namely students, teachers, principals, parents, and the community. This program provides academic, social, and health benefits that are felt directly, fairly, and evenly. The movement also succeeded in encouraging positive changes in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects of the target groups, thus creating a more positive and student-centered school culture. However, the resources, including funding, human resources, and infrastructure, are still inadequate and need improvement. The implementation of this program involved various actors with different powers, interests, and strategies, but in general, it showed high commitment and support. The characteristics of the implementing agencies, such as a flexible organizational structure, a responsive organizational culture, and strong leadership, also supported the successful implementation. Based on the results of the study, it is recommended that the Singkawang City Government increase support and socialization of the program, as well as strengthen regulations. Schools are encouraged to continue to innovate and involve the entire school community. Parents and communities are expected to improve understanding and participation in the program.

References

Alwi, S. K. K., Zaman, Z., Rauf, M. B., Farrukh, T., & Parveen, S. (2021). Economic Prosperity and Education are Two Sides of the Same Coin: Role Analysis of Public and Private Educational Sectors for Economic Growth. Multicultural Education, 7(10), 257-265.

Amrisal, A., & Hamdana, D. (2024). The Role of School Policies, Teacher Practices, and Peer Interactions in Creating a Safe and Inclusive Learning Environment. Educia Journal, 2(1), 11-22.

Anokam, E. O., & Ipem, J. (2022). The Influence of Safety School Environment on Inclusive Education for Sustainable Development. Educational Research (IJMCER), 4(6), 81-88.

Bickmore, K. (2011). Policies and programming for safer schools: Are “anti-bullying” approaches impeding education for peacebuilding?. Educational Policy, 25(4), 648-687.

Cortese, A. D. (2003). The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for higher education, 31(3), 15-22.

Edmonds, R. (2020). Characteristics of effective schools. In The school achievement of minority children (pp. 93-104). Routledge.

Finkelhor, D. (2009). The prevention of childhood sexual abuse. The future of children, 169-194.

Gilabert, P. (2018). Human dignity and human rights. Oxford University Press.

Grindle, M. S. (2017). Politics and policy implementation in the Third World.

Hilton, M. L., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.

Lezotte, L. W. (2011). Effective schools: Past, present, and future. Journal for Effective Schools, 10(1), 3-22.

Lockheed, M. E., & Levin, H. M. (2012). Creating effective schools. In Effective schools in developing countries (pp. 1-19). Routledge.

Morrison, B. (2007). Restoring safe school communities. Federation Press.

Morrison, G. M., Furlong, M. J., & Morrison, R. L. (1994). School violence to school safety: Reframing the issue for school psychologists. School psychology review, 23(2), 236-256.

Mukti, M. P. W., Cahyono, A., & Suwardi, S. (2023, September). Quality Education Plays A Central Role in Shaping A Superior and Competitive Generation. In International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology (Vol. 9, pp. 447-451).

Rustiadi, S. (2015). Creating better education system, building stronger human capital: A creative industries perspective. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 169, 378-386.

Sleeter, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (2008). Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class and gender. John Wiley & Sons.

Stash, S., & Hannum, E. (2001). Who goes to school? Educational stratification by gender, caste, and ethnicity in Nepal. Comparative Education Review, 45(3), 354-378.

Suwito Eko, P., Eko, H., Munandar, M. A., & Rachman, M. (2020). Local Wisdom: Pillar Development of Multicultural Nations and National Education Values. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(6), 1587-1598.

Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational psychology review, 28(2), 315-352.

Wang, X., & Ruan, J. (2024, March). Education helps to achieve shared prosperity: evidence from China. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1296141). Frontiers Media SA.

Yankovych, O., & Binytska, K. (2019). Preparation of future masters of elementary education to the formation of a successful personality of junior schoolchildren. ???????????? ??????. ?????: ??????????, (8), 43-56.