Implementation Of Sem Model: Combination Of Tam And Tpb In Using Onshore Power Supply In Ports Of Java Island - Indonesia

Febriyanti Febriyanti; Muhammad  Thamrin; Lira Agusinta; Yosi Pahala

doi:10.38035/dijemss.v6i2.3775

Authors

Febriyanti Febriyanti Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Indonesia
Muhammad Thamrin Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Indonesia
Lira Agusinta Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Indonesia
Yosi Pahala Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i2.3775

Keywords:

Technology Acceptance Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, Onshore Power Supply, Ports

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of variables within the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) on behavioral intention and actual use of Onshore Power Supply (OPS) in Java Island ports, Indonesia. The study employs a quantitative approach with seven constructs: Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Risk, Subjective Norm, Attitude Toward Using OPS, Behavioral Intention to Use OPS, and Actual System Use of OPS. The novelty of this research lies in the application of a combined TAM and TPB model to analyze OPS adoption in ports as a strategic step to support environmental sustainability and operational efficiency. Data collection involved a Likert-scale (1-5) questionnaire distributed to 240 OPS users across various ports on Java Island and interviewed with 10 informants from both operators and users. The data were analyzed using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach with PLS version 4.0.9.6. The results of testing 14 hypotheses show that all variables have a positive and significant influence on behavioral intention and actual use of OPS, with Subjective Norm being the most significant contributor to Attitude Toward Using OPS (coefficient value of 0.378). The study also revealed that the lowest-rated indicators were related to the perceived ease of approval processes for OPS construction (Perceived Ease of Use), user comfort (Perceived Usefulness), and perceived risks of equipment damage (Perceived Risk). To address these issues, strategic steps such as digitizing licensing processes, automating OPS systems, and implementing international safety standards are recommended. The proposed policy implications involve the government providing incentives for environmentally friendly technologies and enabling regulations to strengthen the adoption of OPS in national ports. This research significantly contributes to the development of policies and operational strategies that support the transition of ports in Indonesia toward more sustainable and environmentally efficient practices.

References

ABB. (2016). Shore-to-ship power. ABB Review, 1(1), 56–60.

Amaral, M., Amaro, N., & Arsénio, P. (2023). Methodology for assessing power needs for onshore power supply in maritime ports. Sustainability, 15(24), 16670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416670

Ambak, K., Harun, N. E., Rosli, N., Daniel, B. D., Prasetijo, J., Abdullah, M. E., & Rohani, M. M. (2016). Driver intention to use electric cars using technology acceptance model. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(3), 1524–1528.

Awa, H. O., Ojiabo, O. U., & Emecheta, B. C. (2015). Integrating TAM, TPB, and TOE frameworks and expanding their characteristic constructs for e-commerce adoption by SMEs. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 6(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2014-0012Childe, S., & Soares, A. (2022). Handbook of Research Methods for Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975865

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Gao, B., Cao, Y., Hu, X., & Zhou, X. (2021). TAM-Based Acceptance Model for Port Shore Power System. CONVERTER MAGAZINE, 2021(8), 195–206.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When To Use And How To Report The Results Of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Sharma, P. N., & Liengaard, B. D. (2024). Going beyond the untold facts in PLS–SEM and moving forward. European Journal of Marketing, 58(13), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2023-0645

IQAir. (2023). Jelajahi Kualitas Udara Anda. Https://Www.Iqair.Com/Id/.

Jabeen, G., Yan, Q., Ahmad, M., Fatima, N., & Qamar, S. (2019). Consumers’ intention-based influence factors of renewable power generation technology utilization: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117737

Jeffyan Alberto, & Fahrul Riza. (2023). Electrifying consumer choices: Unveiling the road to green intentions and EV adoption. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 8(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.29244/jcs.8.3.256-276

Kim, K. (2022). Characteristics of Economic and Environmental Benefits of Shore Power Use by Container-Ship Size. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(5), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10050622

Lee, M. C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006

Nadlifatin, R., Ardiansyahmiraja, B., & Persada, S. F. (2020). The measurement of university students’ intention to use blended learning system through technology acceptance model (TAM) and theory of planned behavior (TPB) at developed and developing regions: Lessons learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(9), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i09.11517

Nguyen, T. T., Thi Thu Truong, H., & Le-Anh, T. (2023). Online purchase intention under the integration of theory of planned behavior and technology acceptance model. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231218814

Nguyen, V. K. L., Le, T. M. H., Duong, T. N. M., Nguyen, T. S., Le, T. T. H., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2022). Assessing student’s adoption of e-learning: An integration of TAM and TPB framework. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 297–335. https://doi.org/10.28945/5000

Pelindo, S., & Maritim, J. (2024). Profile & Energy Efficiency Strategy. January.

Safeena, R., Date, H., Hundewale, N., & Kammani, A. (2013). Combination of TAM and TPB in internet banking adoption. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 5(1), 146–150. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJCTE.2013.V5.665

Sentosa, I. (2012). Examining a theory of planned behavior and TAM in internet purchasing using structural equation modeling. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 2(2), 62–77.

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (Issue July). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research Methods for Business A Skill-Building Approach?: Seventh Edition. United Kingdom:John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Vitalstrategies. (2023). Sumber Utama Polusi Udara di DKI Jakarta. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078692

Yuniarto, T. (2023). Polusi Udara di Jakarta Semakin Parah. Kompaspedia. https://kompaspedia.kompas.id/baca/paparan-topik/polusi-udara-di-jakarta-semakin-para

Yustiano, O. Y. (2014). Cost and benefit analysis of shore side electricity in the Port of Tanjung Perak, Indonesia. World Maritime University Dissertations, 1(1), 1–139