Antecedentservice Quality Towards User Satisfaction Through Sehati 2.0 Application System Information Technology Special Terminals And Tuks

Authors

  • Ram Agustina Manurung Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Indonesia
  • HM Thamrin Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Denny Siahaan Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Myrza Rahmanita Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i1.3332

Keywords:

Service Quality, Information Technology, User Satisfaction, Sehati 2.0 Application, Special Terminals, TUKS.

Abstract

This study was motivated by various issues faced by the managers of special terminals and TUKS regarding the low user satisfaction with the Sehati 2.0 application. Several problems identified include system unreliability, slow response, as well as a lack of security and user trust in the application. Additionally, a lack of understanding of the users' needs has also been a factor hindering the optimal use of this application. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the impact of service quality on user satisfaction through information technology in the Sehati 2.0 application used in special terminals and TUKS. The research was conducted using a quantitative approach with a sample of 311 managers of special terminals and TUKS. Five constructs were examined: Reliability, Responsiveness, Credibility, Security, and Understanding the Community, and their effects on Information Technology and User Satisfaction. The study employed 11 hypotheses to test the relationships among these variables. The research instrument was a questionnaire with a Likert scale of 1-5, distributed between June 2023 and November 202. Data was processed using SEM AMOS version 23. The model testing results show that reliability, responsiveness, credibility, security, and understanding the community each have a significant impact on user satisfaction with the Sehati 2.0 application. Additionally, these five variables also have a significant influence on information technology within the Sehati 2.0 system, which ultimately has a significant impact on user satisfaction. Regression analysis indicates that the dominant variable most affecting information technology is Reliability, contributing the most to the model. Furthermore, information technology serves as a strong mediating variable in the relationship between service quality and user satisfaction. The determination value (R²) of this model is 78%, indicating that 78% of the variation in user satisfaction can be explained by the independent variables examined in this study.

References

Allibang, S. (2020). Research Methods: Simple, Short and Straightforward Way of Learning Methods Research (2nd ed.). United States: IGI Global Publisher of Timely Knowledge.

Birkland, T. (2001). An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making (3rd ed.). London.

Feng, Z., Qin, X., Jiang, Y., & Chen, H. (2019). Effects of Community Communication Technology (ICT) Usage on Community Satisfaction: Case Study in Nanjing China. Chinese Geographical Science, 29(5), 834-847.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1072-9

Ghozali, I. (2011). Multivariate Analysis Applications with SPSS (Fourth Edition). Semarang: Diponegoro University.

Ghozali, I. (2013). Multivariate Analysis Applications with SPSS, PLS Programs (Seventh Edition). Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.

Ghozali, I. (2020). Multivariate Application with the IBM SPSS 21 Program. Semarang: Diponegoro University.

Hyytinen, A., Jarno, T., & Markus, H. (2022). Enhancing the Adoption of Digital Public Services: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 1-13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101687

Kadarisman, M. (2016). Compensation Management. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Kusumaningrum, A., & Airin, L. (2023). Proceedings of the 1st Brawijaya International Conference on Business and Law (BICoBL 2022) Volume 251. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. Springer.https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-214-9

Meersman, Hilde and Strandenes, Siri Pettersen and van de Voorde, Eddy, Port Pricing: Principles, Structure and Models (April 10, 2014). NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper No. 14/2014, Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2432939orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2432939

Nur, HI, Achmadi, T., & Mercy, K. (2020). Analysis of Seven International Indonesian Hub Ports Policy Development Impact on Shipping and Port Sector. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 557(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/557/1/012061

Roesminingsih, MV, Monica, W., Rofik, JR, & Fahmi, Z. (2024). Quantitative Research Methodology. Madiun: CV Bayfa Indonesian Scholar.

Sastrawan, H., & Menap, H. (2023). Fundamentals of Quantitative Research. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Sugeng, B. (2022). Fundamentals of Quantitative (Explanatory) Research Methodology. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methodology. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-22

How to Cite

Agustina Manurung, R., Thamrin, H., Siahaan, D., & Rahmanita, M. (2024). Antecedentservice Quality Towards User Satisfaction Through Sehati 2.0 Application System Information Technology Special Terminals And Tuks. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 6(1), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i1.3332