Systematic Review Toward A Definition of Technological Leadership

Authors

  • M. Gananta Human Resource Development Doctoral Program, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Prawitra Thalib Human Resource Development Doctoral Program, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Fendy Suhariadi Human Resource Development Doctoral Program, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Ian Firstian Aldhi Human Resource Development Doctoral Program, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Elvia Rahmawati Faculty of Law, Universitas Narotama, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Dwi Hardaningtyas State Administration Science, Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, Universitas Wijaya Putra, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v5i5.2908

Keywords:

Technology Leadership, Systematic Review, Information Technology, Global Technology Development.

Abstract

This article has three interconnected objectives. Firstly, it reviews the recent history of technology leadership research to position the definitions used within the current historical context. Secondly, it compiles a list of definitions and summarizes them through content analysis, providing a comprehensive definition of technology leadership. Thirdly, it presents measurements of technology leadership within an organization. By conducting a systematic review, the study compiles definitions and measurements of technology leadership, emphasizing problem-solving, facilitation, human orientation, interpersonal skills, continuous innovation, organizational support, personal attributes, strategic foresight, and ethical practices. The research provides a comprehensive definition and practical tools for assessing technology leadership, serving as a crucial foundation for future research and organizational strategies.

Author Biographies

Prawitra Thalib, Human Resource Development Doctoral Program, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Prawitra Thalib is a member of the PrivateLaw Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga. He completed his bachelor at the Faculty of Law Universitas Jambi and his master and doctoral at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga. Apart from teaching, researching, and doing law-related projects, he is member of the Indonesian Islamic Economic Law Lecturer Association (APPHEISI) and Indonesian Private Law Lecturer Association (APHK). Since 2020, he has been in charge as the Secretary of Pusat Pengelolaan Dana Sosial (PUSPAS) Universitas Airlangga.

Fendy Suhariadi, Human Resource Development Doctoral Program, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Fendy Suhariadi is a Professor, Head of Doctoral Program Human Resource Development, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia. His research focuses on organizational behavior, leadership, competency, personality, human resource management, and industrial psychology. His research laboratory is now undergoing the registration process at the Postgraduate School, Airlangga University. Several doctoral students from industry are conducting research under his supervision in an effort to provide high-quality work that advances industry and academia.

Ian Firstian Aldhi, Human Resource Development Doctoral Program, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Ian Firstian Aldhi is a Doctor Candidate, Human Resource Development, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia and Research Team Center for Dynamic Capability (CDC). His research focuses on information technology capability, higher education, smart city, transformational leadership, organizational health, and smart policing.

Elvia Rahmawati, Faculty of Law, Universitas Narotama, Surabaya, Indonesia

ELVIA RAHMAWATI is a dedicated graduate student pursuing her Master’s in Law at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Narotama, located in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia. Her academic focus and research interests are centered on the Law in Higher Education and Criminal Law. Through her studies, Elvia is deepening her understanding and expertise in these critical legal studies, positioning herself to contribute meaningfully to the legal field, particularly in educational institutions and criminal justice—pursuing a master’s degree in advancing knowledge and skills in the legal domain.

Dwi Hardaningtyas, State Administration Science, Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, Universitas Wijaya Putra, Surabaya, Indonesia

DWI HARDANINGTYAS is a lecturer of State Administration Science at the Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, Wijaya Putra University, Jalan Pondok Benowo Indah No.1-3, Babat Jerawat, Pakal, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60197 where she is currently a Study Program Quality Assurance Unit. Her research focuses on Human Resource Development, Human Resource Management, Public Sector, Organizational
Citizenship Behavior, Psychology, and Public Administration.

References

Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. A. (2002). The emergence of emerging technologies. California management review, 45(1), 50-66.

Allen, G. (2011). Early intervention: the next steps, an independent report to Her Majesty's government by Graham Allen MP. The Stationery Office.

Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105-131.

Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation, 26(5-6), 644-664.

Binz, T., Breiter, G., Leyman, F., & Spatzier, T. (2012). Portable cloud services using tosca. IEEE Internet Computing, 16(3), 80-85.

Burhan, N. I. H., & Aini, Z. (2021). Analisis Literatur Sistematik (SLR) terhadap Elemen Pembangunan Pendakwah [Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on The Elements of Preacher Development]. BITARA International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences (e-ISSN: 2600-9080), 4(3), 145-164.

Castells, M. (2010). Globalisation, networking, urbanisation: Reflections on the spatial dynamics of the information age. Urban studies, 47(13), 2737-2745.

Cech, V., Lasota, T., Palesch, E., & Lukes, J. (2015). The critical influence of surface topography on nanoindentation measurements of a-SiC: H films. Surface and Coatings Technology, 261, 114-121.

Chandler, R. J. (1977). Back analysis techniques for slope stabilization works: a case record. Geotechnique, 27(4), 479-495.

Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of marketing, 64(3), 1-17.

Chang, H. H., & Chen, S. W. (2008). The impact of online store environment cues on purchase intention: Trust and perceived risk as a mediator. Online information review, 32(6), 818-841.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., Seiford, L. M., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., ... & Seiford, L. M. (1994). Basic DEA models. Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications, 23-47.

Christensen, T. J., & Snyder, J. (1997). Progressive research on degenerate alliances. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 919-922.

Christofi, M., Leonidou, E., & Vrontis, D. (2017). Marketing research on mergers and acquisitions: a systematic review and future directions. International Marketing Review, 34(5), 629-651.

Coccia, M. (2017). Sources of technological innovation: Radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(9), 1048-1061.

Denison, E. F., & Poullier, J. P. (1967). Why Growth Rates Differ: Postwar Experience in Nine Western Countries (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution). Assisted by JP Poullier.

Dougherty, L. R., Smith, V. C., Bufferd, S. J., Stringaris, A., Leibenluft, E., Carlson, G. A., & Klein, D. N. (2013). Preschool irritability: longitudinal associations with psychiatric disorders at age 6 and parental psychopathology. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(12), 1304-1313.

Edvardsson, B., & Olsson, J. (1996). Key concepts for new service development. Service Industries Journal, 16(2), 140-164.

Ergun, Ö., Gui, L., Heier Stamm, J. L., Keskinocak, P., & Swann, J. (2014). Improving humanitarian operations through technology?enabled collaboration. Production and Operations Management, 23(6), 1002-1014.

Ettlie, J. E., & Reza, E. M. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of management journal, 35(4), 795-827.

Fohlin, C. (1999). The rise of interlocking directorates in imperial Germany. Economic History Review, 307-333.

Harms, R., & Schwery, M. (2020). Lean startup: operationalizing lean startup capability and testing its performance implications. Journal of small business management, 58(1), 200-223.

Hobday, M. (2005). Firm-level innovation models: perspectives on research in developed and developing countries. Technology analysis & strategic management, 17(2), 121-146.

Huang, C., & Sharif, N. (2015). Global technology leadership: The case of China. Science and Public Policy, 43(1), 62-73.

Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Belhadi, A., & Mardani, A. (2020). Investigating the effects of renewable energy on international trade and environmental quality. Journal of Environmental management, 272, 111089.

Kranzberg, M. (1967). Technology and Culture of the Past-Content for Industrial Arts. Industrial Arts and Technology-Past, Present and Future, Washington, DC: The American Industrial Arts Association, 26-33.

Lall, S. (1999). Technology policy and competitiveness in Malaysia. Technology, Competitiveness and the State, 148-179.

Lazonick, W. (1988). Financial commitment and economic performance: Ownership and control in the American industrial corporation. Business and Economic History, 115-128.

Leifer, R., O'connor, G. C., & Rice, M. (2001). Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(3), 102-113.

Leonard?Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13(S1), 111-125.

Liker, J. K., Haddad, C. J., & Karlin, J. (1999). Perspectives on technology and work organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 575-596.

Maddison, A. (1987). Growth and slowdown in advanced capitalist economies: techniques of quantitative assessment. Journal of economic literature, 25(2), 649-698.

McDermott, C. M., & O'connor, G. C. (2002). Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues. Journal of Product Innovation Management: an international publication of the product development & management association, 19(6), 424-438.

Mokyr, J. (1990). Punctuated equilibria and technological progress. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 350-354.

Molenda, M. (2008). Historical foundations. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 3-20). Routledge.

Nanjundeswaraswamy, T. S., & Swamy, D. R. (2014). Leadership styles. Advances in management, 7(2), 57.

Nelson, T. O. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125-173). Academic Press.

Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization science, 3(3), 398-427.

Pascucci, D., Mancuso, G., Santandrea, E., Della Libera, C., Plomp, G., & Chelazzi, L. (2019). Laws of concatenated perception: Vision goes for novelty, decisions for perseverance. PLoS biology, 17(3), e3000144.

Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Currency.

Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of operations management, 21(2), 129-149.

Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312-320.

Tülüba?, T., & Celep, C. (2014). Ö?retim elemanlar?n?n sessiz kalma nedenleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi E?itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(29-1), 280-297.

Wittkop, A., Zulauf, K., & Wagner, R. (2018). How digitalization changes the internationalization of entrepreneurial firms: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 6(2), 193-207.

Xu, X., Thong, J. Y., & Venkatesh, V. (2014). Effects of ICT service innovation and complementary strategies on brand equity and customer loyalty in a consumer technology market. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 710-729.

Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting Psychology Journal: practice and research, 62(2), 81.

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

M. Gananta, Thalib, P. ., Suhariadi, F., Aldhi, I. F. ., Elvia Rahmawati, & Hardaningtyas, D. (2024). Systematic Review Toward A Definition of Technological Leadership. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 5(5), 1184–1195. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v5i5.2908