Strategy Formulation of Business Development in Catfish Hatchery Aquaculture (Study on The Panca Wargi Fish Group in Kecamatan Pacet Bandung Regency)

Authors

  • Muhamad Rizki Pratama Universitas Indonesia Membangun, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Fanji Wijaya Universitas Indonesia Membangun, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ezra Karamang Universitas Indonesia Membangun, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v5i5.2687

Keywords:

SWOT, QSPM, Strategy, Panca Warga Fish Group

Abstract

The research was conducted with the aim of finding innovations in designing business development strategies oriented to the external and internal conditions of the Panca Wargi Group. The approach chosen is a qualitative methodology that utilises primary and secondary data types in obtaining information. Interviews were conducted with fourteen interviewees, namely the group leader, core management, and group members. In this strategy planning, the IFE Matrix and EFE Matrix have outlined the internal and external aspects of the group as a basis for strategy design. Based on the results of the Internal and External Matrix (IE), it is found that the condition of the group is in position V which leans towards market penetration and product development strategies with the aim of maintaining stable business growth. The V position of the panca wargi fish group indicates that the internal and external aspects have almost equal strength, which in the losng run will lead to stagnant business development, which may turn out to be dangerous in the future. With the use of the TOWS Matrix and QSPM Matrix, the twelve best alternative strategies have been compiled based on the TAS value to optimise the use of strategies. Panca Wargi Fish Group can get the best business development results starting from having the right strategy formulation.

References

Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif - Dr. H. Zuchri Abdussamad, S.I.K., M.Si. In P. Rapanna (Ed.), CV. syakir Media Press (1st ed.). CV. syakir Media Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=JtKREAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=metode+penelitian&ots=vDCtyS45P0&sig=DGkDYf3OwsEYPbB69HrdHVx6Y7I&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=metode penelitian&f=false

Andrade, C. (2020). The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples. Sage Journals, 43(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000

Anis, M. Y., & Hariani, D. (2019). Pemberian EM4 (Effective Microorganisme 4) Hasil Kultur dalam Media yang Berbeda pada Pakan untuk Budi daya Lele (Clarias sp.). Jurnal Riset Biologi Dan Aplikasinya, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrba.v1n1.p1-8

Ba Hung Anh, D., & Hoang Tien, N. (2020). QSPM matrix based strategic organizational diagnosis. A case of Nguyen Hoang Group in Vietnam. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, Accepted(June), 67–72. www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com

Banka, M., Tien, N. H., Thi, M., Dao, H., & Minh, D. T. (2023). Analysis of business strategy of real estate developers in Vietnam?: The application of QSPM matrix Analysis of business strategy of real estate developers in Vietnam?: The application of QSPM matrix Page No?: 188-196. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 03(January 2022), 188–196. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358021910_Analysis_of_business_strategy_of_real_estate_developers_in_Vietnam_The_application_of_QSPM_matrix

Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., & Mousa, M. M. (2021). SWOT analysis applications?: An integrative literature review. Journal of Global Business Insights (JGBI), 6(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148

Bull, J. W., Jobstvogt, N., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Mascarenhas, A., Sitas, N., Baulcomb, C., Lambini, C. K., Rawlins, M., Baral, H., Zähringer, J., Carter-Silk, E., Balzan, M. V., Kenter, J. O., Häyhä, T., Petz, K., & Koss, R. (2016). Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats: A SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework. Ecosystem Services, 17, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2015.11.012

Christodoulou, A., & Cullinane, K. (2019). Identifying the main opportunities and challenges from the implementation of a port energy management system: A SWOT/PESTLE analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216046

David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2017). Strategic Management: A Competitve Advantage Approach. In Pearson Education Limited (Vol. 1).

David, M. E., David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2009). the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (Qspm) Applied To a Retail Computer Store. The Coastal Business Journal, 8(1), 42–52.

David, M. E., David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2017). The quantitative strategic planning matrix: a new marketing tool. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(4), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2016.1148763

Fauziyah, N., Nirmala, K., & Supriyono, E. (2019). EVALUASI SISTIM BUDIDAYA LELE?: ASPEK PRODUKSI DAN STRATEGI PENGEMBANGANNYA ( Studi Kasus?: Pembudidaya Lele Kabupaten Tangerang ) Evaluation of Catfish Farming System?: Production Aspect and Developmental Strategy ,. JURNAL KEBIJAKAN SOSIAL EKONOMI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN, 129–142. http://ejournal-balitbang.kkp.go.id/index.php/jkse/article/view/7764

Firdaus, M., Maharani, H., & Hafsaridewi, R. (2017). USAHA BUDI DAYA IKAN LELE ( clarias sp ) PADA KAWASAN MINAPOLITAN “ KAMPUNG LELE ” KABUPATEN BOYOLALI Catfish Aquaculture Bussiness at Minapolitan Area “ Kampung Lele ” in Boyolali District. BULETIN ILMIAH MARINA?: SOSIAL EKONOMI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN, 021, 79–89. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/marina.v3i2.7188

Ghorbani, A., Raufirad, V., Rafiaani, P., & Azadi, H. (2015). Ecotourism sustainable development strategies using SWOT and QSPM model: A case study of Kaji Namakzar Wetland, South Khorasan Province, Iran. Tourism Management Perspectives, 16(June 2019), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.09.005

Hakimah, N., Pawestri, W., Suseno, D. N., & Anjarsari, S. W. (2021). Deteksi Residu Oksitetrasiklin pada Ikan Lele yang Dipasarkan di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Veteriner, 22(36), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.19087/jveteriner.2021.22.4.499

Iswanto, B., & Suprapto, R. (2015). ABNORMALITAS MORFOLOGIS BENIH IKAN LELE AFRIKA ( Clarias gariepinus ). Media Akuakultur, 10(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/ma.10.2.2015.51-57

Iswanto, B., Suprapto, R., Marnis, H., & Imron, I. (2016). PERFORMA REPRODUKSI IKAN LELE MUTIARA ( Clarias gariepinus ). Media Akuakultur, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15578/ma.11.1.2016.1-9

Juarsa, R. P., & Sangadah, H. A. (2023). Position Analysis and Strategic Recommendations for Business Improvement in The Micro-Small Industry of Oil Palm Post-Harvest Equipment in Kampar Regency , Riau Province Analisis Posisi dan Rekomendasi Strategis Peningkatan Bisnis pada Industri Mikro Keci. Industria: Jurnal Teknologi Dan Manajemen Agroindustri, 12(2), 118–130.

Li, T. (2020). A SWOT analysis of China’s air cargo sector in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Air Transport Management, 88(August), 101875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101875

Mallick, S. K., Rudra, S., & Samanta, R. (2020). Sustainable ecotourism development using SWOT and QSPM approach: A study on Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 8(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.06.001

Phadermrod, B., Crowder, R. M., & Wills, G. B. (2019). Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 194–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.009

Shri, C., Gupta, M., & Anshu, A. (2015). Strategy Formulation for Performance Improvement of Indian Corrugated Industry?: An Application of SWOT Analysis and QSPM Matrix. The Journal of Applied Packaging Research, 60–75. https://scholarworks.rit.edu/japr/vol7/iss3/3/

Stone, D. M., Dulohery, K., Scully, D., Campbell, T., & Smith, C. F. (2020). Strength , Weakness , Opportunity , Threat ( SWOT ) Analysis of the Adaptations to Anatomical Education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic. Anatomical Sciences Ed, 308(June), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1967

Sumitro, S., Afandi, A., Hidayat, K. W., & Pratiwi, R. (2020). Evaluasi Beberapa Desain Pipa Mikropori Sebagai Sistem Aerasi Dalam Budidaya Ikan Lele (Clarias gariepinus) Intensif Berbasis Teknologi Bioflok. Journal of Aquaculture and Fish Health, 9(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.20473/jafh.v9i2.16692

Tajerin, T. (2009). Efisiensi Teknis Usaha Budidaya Pembesaran Ikan Lele di Kolam (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Tulung Agung, Propinsi Jawa Timur). Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 12(1 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.v12i1.517

Widodo, T., Santoso, A. B., Ishak, S. I., & Rumeon, R. (2023). Sistem Kendali Proporsional Kualitas Air berupa Ph dan Suhu pada Budidaya Ikan Lele Berbasis IoT. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN), 9(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.26418/jp.v9i1.59607

Wijaya, F., & Adib, M. (2019). Formulasi Perancangan Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Menggunakan Analisis SWOT dan Business Model Canvas. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen & Bisnis, 10(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/jimb.v10i2.15308

Wijaya, F., Aryanti, A. N., & Herlinawati, E. (2023). BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IN FISH CAGE GROUP (STUDY ON FISH BAMBOO CAGE GROUP IN SUKAJADI DISTRICT, BANDUNG CITY. AdBispreneur?: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 08(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/adbispreneur.v8i1

Zulkarnain, A., Wahyuningtias, D., & Putranto, T. S. (2018). Analysis of IFE , EFE and QSPM matrix on business development strategy Analysis of IFE , EFE and QSPM matrix on business development strategy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/

Published

2024-06-10

How to Cite

Muhamad Rizki Pratama, Fanji Wijaya, & Ezra Karamang. (2024). Strategy Formulation of Business Development in Catfish Hatchery Aquaculture (Study on The Panca Wargi Fish Group in Kecamatan Pacet Bandung Regency). Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 5(5), 1018–1028. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v5i5.2687