Effect of Promotion, Quality of Service and Price on Competitiveness With Brand Image as an Intervening Variable at Ibu Suparni Boutique

Authors

  • Octa Nilam Lukkita Aga Doctor of Management Study Program, UBJ Postgraduate Program, Bekasi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v4i5.1911

Keywords:

Product Quality, Service Quality, Price, Citra Merek, Competitiveness, Structural Equation Modeling, LISREL

Abstract

The Influence of Product Quality, Service Quality and Price to Competitiveness with Citra Merek as Intervening VariaBle (Case Study on Suparni Boutique Boutique). This study aims to determine (1) the effect of Product Quality on Competitiveness on Suparni Butik (2) the influence of Service Quality on Competitiveness in Suparni Butik (3) Price Influence on Competitiveness in Suparni Boutique Boutique (4) Product Quality Influence to Citra Merek at Butik IBu Suparni (5) the influence of Service Quality to Citra Merek on Suparni Butik (6) Price Influence on Citra Merek on Suparni Boutique (7) Citra Merek influence to Competitiveness on Suparni Boutique Boutique. This research uses saturated sampling technique. The population of this research is all customer of Mrs. Suparni which amounted to 210 people. This research method uses quantitative research method with LISREL computer program and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).The result of the research shows that there is a significant influence of Product Quality on Competitiveness in Suparni Boutique Boutique with the value of T Statistics 5,46 ? 1.96. There is a significant influence of Service Quality on Competitiveness at Suparni Boutique Boutique with the value of T Statistics is 6.19 ? 1.96. There is a significant influence on the Competitiveness of Competitiveness in Suparni's Boutique Boutique with the value of T Statistics is 8.03 ? 1.96. There is no significant effect of Product Quality on Citra Merek on Suparni Boutique Bout with T Statistics is 1.83 ? 1.96. There is no significant effect of Service Quality on Citra Merek on Suparni Boutique with T Statistics is 1.56 ? 1.96. There is no significant effect on Citra Merek Prices on Suparni Boutique Boutiques with T Statistics Being 0.54 ? 1.96. There is no significant effect of Citra Merek on Competitiveness in Suparni's Boutique Boutique with the value of T Statistics is 0.53 ? 1.96.

References

Haq, Annisa Diana. 2016. Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Competitiveness of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Bantul Regency. Journal. Yogyakarta Muhammadiyah University.

Bollen, K and Lennox, R. 1991. “Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspectives. Psychological Bulletins. 110 (2), pp. 305- 314.

Ghozali, Imam, and Fuad, 2008, Structural Equation Modeling: Theory, Concepts and Applications with the Lisrel 8.0 Program, Semarang: UNDIP Publishing Agency

Kotler, Philip. 2001. Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. Jakarta : PT. Prehallindo

Kotler, Philip, 2005, Marketing Management. Eleventh Edition. Prentice Hall Pearson Educatin International Inc, New Jersey, USA.

Kotler, Philip. 2006. Marketing Management 11th Edition. Jakarta: PT. Index

Porter, Michael. 1994. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Maintaining Superior Performance. Script Binarupa: Jakarta.

Retna. 2013. The Effect of Promotion and Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction at PDAM Tirta Pakuan Bogor City. Journal: Bogor

Sunarto, Kamanto. (2004). Introduction to Sociology (third edition). Jakarta : Publishing Institute, Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia.

Wijanto, S.H. 2008. Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL 8.80: Concepts and Tutorials. Yogyakarta: Science Graha.

Wijanto, Setyo Hari. 2008. Structural Equation Modeling with Lisrel 8.8: Concepts and Tutorials, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.

Published

2023-06-10

How to Cite

Lukkita Aga, O. N. (2023). Effect of Promotion, Quality of Service and Price on Competitiveness With Brand Image as an Intervening Variable at Ibu Suparni Boutique. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 4(5), 776–782. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v4i5.1911