The Influence of System Quality and Perception of Ease of Use on The Success of Using E-Procurement Systems in the Open University

Authors

  • Susilo Edi Prianto Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Antonius Setyadi Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v4i4.1806

Keywords:

System Quality, Information Quality, successful use of e-procurement systems

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of system quality and perceived ease of use on the successful use of the e-procurement system at the Open University.

Design/methodology/approach - The population in this study were 357 internal users of the e-procurement system at the Open University, a sample of 107 people was determined proportionally to the conditions of the population strata. The analytical method used in this study is descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analysis with SPSS 22 software.

Findings – The results showed that system quality had a positive and significant effect on the successful use of the e-procurement system and perceived ease of use had a positive and significant effect on the successful use of the e-procurement system. While the results of simultaneous measurements, system quality and perceived ease of use also have a positive and significant effect on the successful use of the e-procurement system at the Open University.

References

Atmaja, R. A., & Sfenrianto. (2021). An Evaluation The Implementation of E- Procurement Application At Contractor Company. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 99(8), 1902–1914.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(5), 319–339.
Daud, N. M., Thurasamy, R., Isaac, O., & Abdulsalam. (2018). The mediating of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use: the case of mobile banking in Yemen. International Journal of Technology Diffusion, 9(2), 21–40.
Ghozali, Imam. 2011. “Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS”. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Harjito, Y., Achyani, F., & Payamta, P. (2015). Implementasi E-Procurement Ditinjau Dari Kesuksesan Sistem Teknologi Informasi Dengan Menggunakan Model Delone dan Mclean. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 18(1), 61–82.
Hardjowijono Budiharjo dan Hayie Muhammad. (2008). Daftar Simak Monitoring Proses Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. Indonesia Procurement Watch Jakarta.
Harjito, Y. (2016). E-procurement: Peluang Dan Tantangan Bagi Pemerintah Daerah. Iqtishadia, 8(1), 73–92.
Haryati, N., Burhany, D. I., & Suhartanto, D. (2019). Assessing the profitability of Islamic banks: The role of bank age and bank performance. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 662(6), 1–6.
Khairrunnisa, U., & Yunanto, M. (2017). Pengaruh kualitas sistem terhadap kepuasan pengguna dan manfaat bersih pada implementasi e-faktur: Validasi model kesuksesan sistem informasi Delone Dan Mclean. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, 22(3).
Krisdiantoro, Y., Subekti, I., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2019). Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem dan Kualitas Informasi terhadap Manfaat Bersih dengan Intensitas Penggunaan sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 5(3), 261–279.
Kademaunga, C. K., & Phiri, J. (2019). Factors affecting successful implementation of electronic procurement in government institutions based on the technology acceptance model. Open Journal of Business and Management, 7(4), 1705–1714.
Karim, J., & Lasena, M. (2017). Analisis Kebijakan E-procurement Di Pemerintah Provinsi Gorontalo Menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model Dan End User Computing Satisfaction. ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, 9(3), 338–347.
Layongan, C., Nangoi, G. N., & Kalalo, M. K. (2022). Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem dan Kualitas Informasi Software SAP terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna pada PT PLN (Persero) Unit Pelaksana Pelayanan Pelanggan (UP3) Kotamobagu. Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum, 5(2), 309–322.
Masudin, I., Aprilia, G. D., Nugraha, A., & Restuputri, D. P. (2021). Impact of E - procurement adoption on company performance: Evidence from Indonesian manufacturing industry. Logistics, 5(1), 1–16.
Purwanto, S. K., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem, Kualitas Informasi, Dan Kualitas Layanan Terhadap Penggunaan sisteme-Learning Di Program Pascasarjana Universitas Mercu Buana. Jurnal Manajemen, 21(2), 282–305.
Prasetyo, M. A. (2019). Pengaruh E-Procurement, Kualitas Produk Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Dimoderasi Oleh Pelayanan Purna Jual Studi Pada Produk Smartkey & Smartlock Di Pt Netwave Maju Abadi. Journal For Business And Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 1–15.
Ramadhani, K. Y., Adawiyah, W. R., & Novandari, W. (2021). Successful E- Procurement Implementation: A Case Study in a Construction Industry Company. Sustainable Competitive Advantage, 11(1), 938–946.
Sari, I. P., & Arifin, J. (2016). Analysis of Factors Influencing the Successful E- Procurement Implementation. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Successful E-Procurement Implementation, 1–30.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J., Liang, T., & Turban, D. (2018). Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective. New Jersey: Pearson prentice Hall, Inc.
Wahyudi, R., Astuti, E. S., & Riyadi. (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas S istem, Informasi dan Pelayanan SIAKAD Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 23(2), 28–39.
Wanniarachchige, M. K. (2014). Determinants of Information System Success in Public Sector Organizations?: With Special Reference to Organizations Located in the Matara District of Sri Lanka. International Conference on Management and Economics, 3(5), 143–150
Weele, A. V. (2010). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. London: Cengage Learning EMEA.

Published

2023-04-15

How to Cite

Susilo Edi Prianto, & Setyadi, A. (2023). The Influence of System Quality and Perception of Ease of Use on The Success of Using E-Procurement Systems in the Open University. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 4(4), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v4i4.1806