BUILDING FEASIBILITY STRATEGIC QUALITY IMPROVEMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM INSTALLATION AT INDONESIAN ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF YOGYAKARTA

Authors

  • Ismail Ismail Islamic Education Management, Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Fatonah Fatonah Faculty of Teacher’s Training and Education, Universitas Jambi
  • Muhamad Yusuf Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Maisah Maisah Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Fadlilah Fadlilah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v3i6.1351

Keywords:

Building Strategic Feasibility, Quality Improvemen of Higher Education, Through Internal Quality Assurance, System Intallation

Abstract

Building strategic feasibility towards improving the quality of higher education institutions is a must for every higher education institution so that they are able to compete and adapt to various dynamics of contestation, technological change, as well as socio-economic and cultural changes. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study design at UII Yogyakarta, as one of the oldest private universities in Indonesia. Data were collected through interviews, documentation and direct observation. The findings show that the implementation of the internal quality assurance system in UII Yogyakarta is carried out through an ongoing process phase that improves the quality of the education process through decision making, implementation, evaluation, management and improvement. The quality assurance cycle is a process that helps ensure that the quality of a product or service is high. The SPMI Study Program at UII Yogyakarta is carried out by the Quality Assurance Cluster System organization (SGPM) in coordination with the Quality Assurance Agency of the Islamic University of Indonesia (BPM-UII) in which the quality assurance (QA) specialist is responsible for planning and implementing a quality assurance system that is comprehensive and complete.. The SPMI cycle consists of nine steps or stages, namely: standard setting process, implementation, and monitoring of a project which are essential to ensuring quality, self-evaluation and internal quality audit which are also important ways to ensure that the project remains on track., formulation of corrections, and in order to improve the quality of service delivered to stakeholders, it is important to ensure that everyone is satisfied with the results.. Utilization of the results of the implementation of SPMI at UII Yogyakarta is carried out internally to improve the performance of study programs.

References

Bounds, G. (1994). Beyond Total Quality Management Toward the Emerging Paradigm. McGraw Hill Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2020). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Education, M. of N. (2008). Implementation of the Higher Education Internal Quality Assurance System. Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of National Education.

Education, M. of N. (2010). Higher education quality assurance system (SPM-PT). Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of National Education.

Education, M. of N. (2003). Guidelines for Higher Education Quality Assurance. Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of National Education.

Government Regulation No. 4 of 2014, concerning the Implementation of Higher Education and Management of Higher Education.

Ghofur, H. S. (2008). Management of Higher Education Quality Assurance in Indonesia. PT. Earth Literature.

Hamel, J., S. Dufour, and D. F. (1993). Case Study Methods Newbury Park. Sage.

Hedwig, R. (2006). Quality Assurance System Model and Its Application Process in Higher Education. Graha Ilmu.

Law No. 12 of 2012, concerning Higher Education.

Macdonald, J. (2005). Understanding total quality management in a week. St Edmundsbury Press.

Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. Jossey-Bass.

Oakland, J.S & Beardmore, D. (1995). Best Practice Customer Service. Total Quality Management. In 6 (pp. 135 – 148).

Sallis, E. (2010). Integrated Quality Management. Publisher. IRSisoD.

Stakes, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks. Sage.

Tampubolon, R. A. (2011). Management Principles. Bandung. https://bpm.uii.ac.id/profil-bpm/sekilas-implementasi-sistem-penjaminan-mutu-uii

Tjiptono, F. & Diana, A. (1995). Total quality management. Andi Offset.

Worthen, H. & Berry, J. (2002). Bargaining for “Quality” in Higher Education: A Case Study from the City Colleges of Chicago. Labor Studies Journal, 27, 1–23.

Yin, R. (2013). Case study research: Design & methods. Sage Publications, Inc.

Yogyakarta, U. (n.d.). Accreditation at UII Yogyakarta. https://www.uii.ac.id/accreditation-program-studi/

RI Law No. 20 of 2003 on National Education System, (2003) (testimony of Ministry of National Education).

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 50 of 2014, concerning SNPT-DIKTI.

Published

2022-08-11

How to Cite

Ismail Ismail, Fatonah, F., Muhamad Yusuf, Maisah Maisah, & Fadlilah Fadlilah. (2022). BUILDING FEASIBILITY STRATEGIC QUALITY IMPROVEMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM INSTALLATION AT INDONESIAN ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF YOGYAKARTA. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 3(6), 915–930. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v3i6.1351