APPLICATION OF INTERESTS AND PERFORMANCE IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING MANAGEMENT, AS WELL AS THEIR EFFECT ON WORK PRODUCTIVITY

Authors

  • Handy Suryadi Instansi UPI YAI, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhammad al azhary Instansi UPI YAI, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Anoesyirwan Moeins Instansi UPI YAI, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v3i1.1042

Keywords:

Performance Evaluation, Training, Productivity.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is as follows: (1) Knowing the evaluation of the performance of the implementation of educational and training programs based on the analysis of interests and performance, so that the results of the review can provide input to the company about activities that must be improved (concentrate here), maintained (keep up good work), have low priority ( low priority ), and the possibility of excessive (possible overkill). (2) Know the level of influence of the implementation of existing education and training programs on employee work productivity. Based on the data processing results, it is known that the elements of the implementation of education and training programs that must be considered and improved are as follows: Training Materials, Non-Formal Education, Training Schedule, Instructor Friendliness, Training Variations, Training Methods, and Training Manuals. While the elements of the implementation of education and training programs that must be maintained are as follows: Formal Education, Instructor Expertise, Instructor Ability, Training Infrastructure Facilities, Training Curriculum, Training Evaluation. The implementation of education and training programs affects employee work productivity, and the implementation of training programs is more dominant. This is because the implementation of training programs is more often done and more applicable, although it still seems theoretical on the employee's work. Therefore, the proper education and training programs will impact increasing the productivity of their employees.

References

Al-Rasyid, Harun. Diktat Analisis Jalur. Bandung : UNPAD, 1998.
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 1996. Manajemen Penelitian. PT. Pustaka Binaman Presindo, Yogyakarta.
Bernardin, H.J and Russel, JEA. ( 1993 ). Human Resources Management, New York: Mc. Graw Hill, Inc.
Cascio, WF. (1998). Managing Human Resources, New York : Mc.Graw Hill, Inc.
David J. Cherrington (1989), Job Satisfaction, New York, Mc Grawe Hill.Inc.
Dessler Garry. (1997). Managing Human Resources, New York.: Mc.Graw Hill, Inc.
Franch. Wendell L. (1998). Human Resources Management, New York: Houghton Miffin Company.
Flippo, Edwin B. (Terjemahan Moh. Masud). (1996) Manajemen Personalia, Jakarta, Erlangga.
Haque dan Falk (2000), Measuring Job Productivity, Journal of Human Resource Managemen, Emerald, London..
Heijrachman R & Suad Husnan. (1997). Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta. BPFE.
.I. G. Wursanto. (1989). Manajemen Kepegawaian, Yogyakarta, Kanisius.
Kotler, Philip, (2003). Marketing Management. Prentice-Hall, New-York.
Laporan Tahunan PT. PLN PALEMBANG, 2003. Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan. Bandung.
Milkovich. G.T. and Boudreau J.W. (1997). Human Resources Management, Boston. Irwin, Inc.
Mulya Nasution. (1994). Manajemen Personalia, Jakarta, Jambatan.
Putti. J.M. & Toh T.S. (1988).Cases In Human Resources Management, Federal Publications. Pte.Ltd.
Putti. J.M. (1988). A. Manager’s Primer On Performance Appraisals: Concepts and Technique. Federal Publications. Pte.Ltd.
Tan. C.H. & Torrington Deren. (1998). Human Resources Management For South East Asia and Hongkong, Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Stoner, James A.F. (1995).Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Edition.

Published

2021-12-28

How to Cite

Suryadi, H. ., al azhary, M. ., & Moeins, A. . (2021). APPLICATION OF INTERESTS AND PERFORMANCE IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING MANAGEMENT, AS WELL AS THEIR EFFECT ON WORK PRODUCTIVITY. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 3(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v3i1.1042