AI Adoption and Institutional Competitive Advantages: The Mediating Roles of Dynamic Capabilities and Moderation in Academic Transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v7i3.7072Keywords:
Knowledge Creation Capability, Academic Innovation Capability, Research Collaboration Capability, Institutional Dynamic Academic Capability, AI Adoption, Institutional Competitive AdvantageAbstract
Digital transformation has intensified the pressure on higher education institutions to achieve sustainable Institutional Competitive Advantage through the effective management of academic resources and digital technologies. Although Knowledge Creation Capability, Academic Innovation Capability, and Research Collaboration Capability have been widely recognized as important organizational capabilities, the mechanism through which these capabilities are transformed into Institutional Competitive Advantage remains insufficiently understood. This study aims to synthesize empirical evidence concerning the relationships among Knowledge Creation Capability, Academic Innovation Capability, Research Collaboration Capability, Institutional Dynamic Academic Capability, AI Adoption, and Institutional Competitive Advantage. A semi-systematic (narrative) literature review was conducted by synthesizing 78 empirical articles published in Scopus-indexed journals between 2020 and 2025. The conceptual synthesis integrates the Resource-Based View, Dynamic Capability Theory, and the Technology-Organization-Environment framework, while Structural Equation Modeling serves as the analytical perspective for interpreting the relationships reported in previous empirical studies. The synthesized evidence indicates that Knowledge Creation Capability, Academic Innovation Capability, and Research Collaboration Capability constitute complementary antecedents of Institutional Dynamic Academic Capability. Institutional Dynamic Academic Capability functions as the central mediating mechanism that transforms academic capabilities into Institutional Competitive Advantage, whereas AI Adoption strengthens this relationship by enhancing organizational adaptability, knowledge utilization, and strategic responsiveness. Based on these findings, this study proposes an integrated conceptual model that advances the understanding of capability-based academic transformation and provides a theoretical foundation for future empirical research and strategic digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions.
References
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2021). Resource-Based Theory and the Value Creation Framework. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1936–1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211021655
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Cordeiro, M., Puig, F., & Ruiz-Fernández, L. (2023). Realizing dynamic capabilities and organizational knowledge in effective innovations: The capabilities typological map. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(10), 2581–2603. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2022-0080
Ducharme, L. J., Fujimoto, K., Kuo, J., Stewart, J., Taylor, B., & Schneider, J. (2024). Collaboration and Growth in a Large Research Cooperative: A Network Analytic Approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 102, 102375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102375
Elistia, E., Purwana, D., Sebayang, K. D., et al. (2024). The Role of Knowledge Management and Dynamic Capabilities on Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Indonesian Private Higher Education. Qubahan Academic Journal. https://journal.qubahan.com/index.php/qaj/article/view/701
Fitriasari, N. S., Sensuse, D. I., Hidayat, D. S., & Purwaningsih, E. H. (2024). A systematic literature review on university collaboration in open innovation: Trends, technologies, and frameworks. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1), 40–58.
Ghozali, I., & Kusumadewi, K. A. (2023). Partial Least Squares: Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 4.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris (1st ed.). Yoga Pratama.
Guerrero, M., & Menter, M. (2024). Driving change in higher education: The role of dynamic capabilities in strengthening universities' third mission. Small Business Economics, 63(3), 1321–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00869-4
Han, L., & Zhao, Y. (2026). The SECI model of knowledge creation as an enabler of students' creative behavior through the lens of absorptive capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1708055
Hart, P. F., & Rodgers, W. (2024). Competition, competitiveness, and competitive advantage in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 49(11), 2153–2177.
Heaton, S., Teece, D., & Agronin, E. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and governance: An empirical investigation of financial performance of the higher education sector. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 520–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3444
Kapoor, M., & Aggarwal, V. (2021). Comprehending a knowledge framework as a source of dynamic capabilities in IJVs through PLS-SEM. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(4), 920–942. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2020-0212
Kumar, V., Kumar, S., Chaudhuri, R., Chatterjee, S., Vrontis, D., & Rezaee Vessal, S. (2025). Innovation capability and R&D performance of organizations: Moderating role of industry–academic knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 29(3), 891–914. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2024-0175
Leih, S., & Teece, D. J. (2022). Campus leadership and the dynamic capabilities of public universities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(4), 1018–1041. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0022
Li, B., Teece, D. J., Baskaran, A., & Chandran, V. G. R. (2025). Dynamic knowledge management: A dynamic capabilities approach to knowledge management. Technovation, 147, 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103316
Lin, T., Zhang, J., & Xiong, B. (2025). Effects of Technology Perceptions, Teacher Beliefs, and AI Literacy on AI Technology Adoption in Sustainable Mathematics Education. Sustainability, 17(8), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083698
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x
Marques, C. S., Ferreira, J. J., Marques, C. P., & Leal, C. (2024). Understanding university–industry collaboration: A social exchange perspective on the entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer.
Muneeb, D., Ahmad, S. Z., Abu Bakar, A. R., & Nazir, O. (2025). Role of dynamic capabilities in driving competitiveness of higher educational institutions. Management Research Review, 48(7), 1121–1147. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2024-0424
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Rahiman, H. U., & Kodikal, R. (2024). Revolutionizing education: Artificial intelligence empowered learning in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2293431. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2293431
Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Andrade-Vargas, L., Rivera-Rogel, D., & Portuguez-Castro, M. (2021). Trends for the future of education programs for professional development. Sustainability, 13(13), 7244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137244
Singh, S. K., Gupta, S., Busso, D., & Kamboj, S. (2021). Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 128, 788–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Stern, M. J., Briske, D. D., & Meadow, A. M. (2021). Opening learning spaces to create actionable knowledge for conservation. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(5), e378. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.378
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Yin, X., Li, F., Chen, J., & Zhai, Y. (2023). Innovating from university–industry collaboration: The mediating role of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24(6), 1550–1572. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-10-2022-0255
Zawislak, P. A., Alves, A. C., Tello-Gamarra, J., Barbieux, D., & Reichert, F. M. (2012). Innovation capability: From technology development to transaction capability. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(2), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000200002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hari Moektiwibowo, Supardi Tahir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA).
