Impact of Theory of Planned Behavior on Financial Satisfaction Based on Fintech Performance

Authors

  • Janny Rowena Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Bahtiar Usman Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Henny Setyo Lestari Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v6i6.5712

Keywords:

attitude toward fintech, subjective norm on herding, perceived overconfidence, intention to use fintech for investment, financial satisfaction based on fintech performance

Abstract

The rapid development of financial technology (fintech) has significantly transformed the way individuals manage their financial activities, influencing not only their financial behaviors but also their overall financial satisfaction. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this study aims to investigate the influence of behavioral factors including attitude attitude toward fintech, subjective norm on herding, perceived overconfidence on financial satisfaction based on fintech performance with intention to use fintech for investment as mediating variable. The study employs a quantitative research design using a survey method with a sample of 400 university students in Indonesia, representing the millennial and Generation Z demographic groups who are among the most active fintech users. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test the hypothesized relationships among variables. The findings highlight that university students’ financial satisfaction in fintech investments is not solely determined by technological factors but by the interaction between attitude, social influence, confidence, and actual behavioral engagement. Positive attitudes and peer-driven norms enhance fintech adoption and satisfaction only when accompanied by meaningful usage and effective fintech performance. Conversely, overconfidence without competence may hinder satisfaction despite technological accessibility.

References

Agarwal, S., Ruenzi, S., & Weigert, F. (2019). Tail risk in overconfident investors’ portfolios. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(3).

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2).

Bank Indonesia. (2023). Statistik Sistem Pembayaran Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1).

Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5).

Bikhchandani, S., & Sharma, S. (2001). Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Staff Papers, 47(3).

Chuang, S. C., Liu, C. C., & Kao, H. Y. (2023). Fintech adoption and financial well-being: The mediating role of usage behavior and trust. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 38.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3).

Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1).

Henager, R., & Cude, B. J. (2019). Financial literacy and long- and short-term financial behavior in different age groups. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 27(1).

Hu, Z., Ding, S., Li, S., Chen, L., & Yang, S. (2019). Adoption intention of fintech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended technology acceptance model. Symmetry, 11(3).

Joo, S., & Grable, J. E. (2004). An exploratory framework of the determinants of financial satisfaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25(1).

Jung, D., Glaser, F., & Köpplin, W. (2022). Fintech adoption, financial satisfaction, and perceived performance: Evidence from young investors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181.

Kaur, H., & Arora, S. (2020). Role of overconfidence and herding in fintech investment decisions: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(7).

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6).

Lee, C. C. (2020). Factors influencing the adoption of fintech investment platforms: Evidence from young investors. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 28.

Lee, I. (2020). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 63(1).

Lee, S. (2020). Determinants of mobile payment usage and the moderating effect of gender. Telematics and Informatics, 51.

Lee, Y. H. (2021). Fintech use and financial satisfaction: The mediating role of financial capability. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 32.

Odean, T. (1999). Do investors trade too much? The American Economic Review, 89(5).

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2024). Laporan Perkembangan Fintech dan Inklusi Keuangan 2024. Jakarta: OJK.

Xiao, J. J., Chen, C., & Chen, F. (2020). Financial capability and fintech adoption: The role of financial literacy and behavioral biases. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 28.

Xiao, J. J., & Porto, N. (2019). Financial education and financial satisfaction: Financial literacy, behavior, and capability as mediators. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(4)

Zhao, Y., & Bacao, F. (2021). Adoption and determinants of mobile payment use in China: Integrating the TPB, TAM and trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 119.

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

Rowena, J., Usman, B., & Lestari, H. S. (2025). Impact of Theory of Planned Behavior on Financial Satisfaction Based on Fintech Performance. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 6(6), 5216–5230. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v6i6.5712

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.