CONTRIBUTION OF PERSONALITY, AND LEADERSHIP TO ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MH.THAMRIN JAKARTA

Authors

  • Mansur Mansur University Students of the University of Mh.Thamrin Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/dijdbm.v1i6.567

Keywords:

Personality, Leadership, Organizational Commitment

Abstract

This study aims to determine the magnitude of the contribution of personality and leadership to the organizational commitment of lecturers. This research method is survey research. The subjects of this study were 80 lecturers randomly taken at MH. Thamrin UniversityJakarta.Data were collected using a questionnaire instrument using a Likert scale. The validity of the data is obtained by testing the validity and reliability; all data have a normal distribution. The results showed that personality contributed significantly to the organizational commitment of lecturers. Likewise, leadership provides a contribution significant to the organizational commitment of lecturers. The coefficient of determinationis personality and leadership that has a moderate relationship to the organizational commitment of lecturers.

References

Allen, NJ, & Meyer, JP 1990.The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63, 1990
Atkinson, et al. 2005.Introduction to Psychology First Edition. Jakarta: Erlangga Publisher.
Wake up, Wilson. 2012. HumanManagement Resource. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Dessler, G. 2000. Human Resource Management 8th edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Feist, J. &. Feist, GJ 2010.Theories of personality. Jakarta: SalembaHumanika.
Gibson, James L., Ivancevich, John M., 1996. Donnelley, Jr. James H. Indonesian Edition Organization. Jakarta: Binarupa script.
Rahman, G. A. 2014. The Effect of Organizational Design and Personality Type on Employee Job Stress at Manado Religious Training Centers. Manado: EMBA Journal ISSN2303-1174, 2014.
Greenberg, Jerald & Baron, Robert., 1997. Behavior In Organizations. United of America: Sixth edition by Prentice Hall Inc.
Henry Lane, W et al. 2004. The Blackwell Handbook of Global Management. Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.
Ivancevich, John M., and Matteson, Michael T. 2008.Organizational Behavior and Management. Singapore: Irwin McGraw Hill.
John, MC, and John, WT 2003.Leadership style, school climate, and the institutional commitment of teacher. Dissertation, Doctoral in Seventh-DayAdventist secondary Schools, In Philippines.
Kartono, Kartini. 2005. Personality Theory. Jakarta: MandarMaju. Klang, A. 2010.Thesis: The Relationship Between Personality and Job Performance in Sales. Stockholm University, Department of Psychology.
Kreitner, Robert and kinicki, Angelo. 2008. Organization behavior. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Luthans, Fred. 2006. Organizational Behavior translation VivinAndhika et al. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Newstrom, John W. 2008. Organizational Behavior.Singapore, McGraw-Hill.
Purba, Debora Eflina&Seniati, Ali N L. 2004. Effect of personality and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behavior.Makara Journal Vol. 8 No. December 3, 2004.
Setyadi, Djoko and Sriekaningsih, Ana. 2015. The Effect of competence and motivation and cultural organization towards organizational commitment and performance on state University Lecturers in East Kalimantan Indonesia. European Journal of Business and Management, Vol.7 No.17, 2015.
SitiAisyah, Karmizi, and Savitri.The Effect of Good Governance, Leadership Style, Organizational Commitment and Organizational Culture on Local Government Performance.JOM FEKON Vol.1 No.2. 2014.
Siagian, Sondang. 2009. Tips for Increasing Work Productivity. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
Sudjiwanati. (2010). The influence of big five personality types on the transformational leadership style of employees of PT. ArtaBogaCemerlang Surabaya. Journal of applicationsManagement, Vol 8, No.3 August 2010.
Law No. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers.
Yuki, Gary. 2006. Leadership in Organization, sixth Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall.

Published

2020-10-24