Baktiseraga Village Governance as a Best Practice of Good Governance in Buleleng Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v7i2.6716Keywords:
Best Practice, Baktiseraga Village, Good Governance, Governance Capacity Framework, GovernanceAbstract
This study aims to comprehensively explore the implementation of good governance principles and identify the enablers and barriers of governance capacity in Baktiseraga Village, Buleleng Regency. Amidst the widespread phenomenon of village fund misallocation at the local level, Baktiseraga Village emerges as a high-performing entity that warrants deep investigation. By integrating Stakeholder Theory to analyze the Pentahelix actors and the Governance Capacity Framework (GCF) for systemic dimensions, this qualitative study employs an in-depth case study design. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 15 key informants, non-participant observations, and documentation studies, which were then analyzed using an interactive model consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The GCF scoring results demonstrate that Baktiseraga Village has successfully achieved a highly optimal transformative capacity level (score ++) in granular information transparency, inclusive accountability, and organic public participation with zero transaction costs by revitalizing the cultural value of ngayah. However, administrative gaps in formal authority and the institutionalization of innovation that remains person-centric pose potential barriers. This study concludes that the governance model of Baktiseraga Village represents a valid best practice in local public administration, offering a strategic recommendation to codify these innovations into Village Regulations.
References
Abdi, J., Fitri, L., Setiawan, D., Eko, P., Utomo, P., & Bhayangkari, S. (2020). Penerapan sistem informasi desa berbasis TIK di Desa Nyogan menuju tata kelola good governance dan kemandirian desa. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 11(2), 112-125.
Aguilar, G. F. (2020). The utility of governance frameworks in modern policy analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(4), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa012
Ali, K., & Saputra, A. (2020). Tata kelola pemerintahan desa terhadap peningkatan pelayanan publik di Desa Pematang Johar. Warta Dharmawangsa, 14(4), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v14i4.891
Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Astuti, P., Widayanti, R., & Damayanti, R. (2021). Tranparansi dan akuntabilitas pengelolaan dana desa dalam pencapaian good governance: Studi kasus Desa Cepogo, Kabupaten Boyolali. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v10i2.628
Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16(5), 290–306.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2024). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when Stakeholders matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dana, P., Mulyani, S., & Didik, R. (2022). Analisis pengembangan desa wisata sebagai best practice penggunaan dana desa untuk mewujudkan good governance dan collaborative governance. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(2), 2548-1398. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i6
Darmanto, E., Wahyudi, N., Pradasari, R., & Ruhibnur, A. (2024). Penerapan sistem informasi untuk mewujudkan tata kelola pemerintahan desa yang baik (Good Governance) di Desa Kuala Satong. Jurnal BUDIMAS, 6(1), 2715–8926.
Ddiba, D., Andersson, K., Koop, S. H. A., & van Leeuwen, K. (2020). The governance capacity framework for assessing the enabling environment for circular economy in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 269, 110759.
Ddiba, D., Kraemer, M., & Koop, S. H. A. (2020). A governance capacity framework for urban resource management in developing countries. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 155, 104645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104645
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
Edowai, M., & Abubakar, H. (2021). Implementasi prinsip-prinsip good governance dalam pelayanan publik di Kantor Distrik Nabire Kabupaten Nabire. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 7(4), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5174495
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
Ganie-Rochman, M. (2012). The state, business and civil society: The continuing quest for good governance in Indonesia. In H. A. Poerwanto (Ed.), Public policy and governance in Indonesia: A reader. The Ford Foundation.
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., Meijerink, S., van den Brink, M., Jong, P., & Bergsma, E. (2010). The Adaptive Capacity Wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the capacity to adapt. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(6), 459-471.
Koop, S. H. A., van Leeuwen, C. J., & Kramer, K. (2017). Governance capacity framework: A tool for assessing the governance capacity of urban areas to adapt to climate change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 143(6), 04017013.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kadek Dwinda Yudha Pratama, Putu Indah Rahmawati, Komang Krisna Heryanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA).
