The Effect of the Fraud Hexagon Model on Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises

Authors

  • Hanna Meyrani Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Yanuar Ramadhan Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Agus Munandar Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Endah Sri Wahyuni Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v7i2.6709

Keywords:

Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Hexagon Theory, State-Owned Enterprises

Abstract

Fraud cases in Indonesia are largely “dominated by state-owned enterprises (SOEs), ironically, these state-owned enterprises are agents of development and drivers of national economic growth (Sari et al., 2023). The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of the hexagon theory on detecting fraud in the financial reporting of SOEs listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) between 2020 and 2024. The research methodology used was a quantitative method with multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that pressure, rationalization, and collusion have a positive effect on the risk of fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile, opportunity, capability and ego factors do not have a positive effect on fraudulent financial reporting. It is recommended that future research combine quantitative and qualitative methods to obtain a comprehensive picture of the measurement of the six hexagon elements that are risk factors for fraudulent financial reporting. Future research can also analyze the measurement of independent variables in more depth. Furthermore, it is recommended to find other measurements for variables that, based on the results of this study, do not have an influence on fraudulent financial reporting. The contribution of this research to companies is that companies can map the risk factors for fraudulent financial reporting so that they can take preventive measures by implementing a code of conduct. Furthermore, stakeholders should be more discerning in their response to audit opinions received by companies.

References

Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013

Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., Helmina, M. R. A., Hapsari, D. I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2023). Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using the Fraud Hexagon Model: Evidence from the Banking Sector in Indonesia. Economies, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11010005

Achmad, T., Hapsari, D. I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Analysis of Fraud Pentagon Theory to Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting using F-Score Model in State-Owned Companies Indonesia. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2022.19.13

Ariyanto, D., Adi, N. M., & Systems, B. (2023). Determinant of fraudulent behavior in the Indonesian rural bank sector using the fraud hexagon perspective. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.18(4).2023.16

Aviantara, R. (2021). The Association Between Fraud Hexagon and Government’s Fraudulent Financial Report. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 6(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v6i1.192

Budiandru, & Safuan. (2022). The Detecting Fraud Financial Statement on Mining Companies in Indonesia. 17(7), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6911419

ekonomi.bisnis.com. (2021). Platform E-Commerce Lihat Peluang Perluasan Penjualan Ritel. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20210603/12/1400977/platform-e-commerce-lihat-peluang-perluasan-penjualan-ritel

Examiners, A. of C. F. (2024). Occupational Fraud 2024: A Report to the Nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

Handoko, B. L., & Salim, A. S. J. (2022). Fraud Detection Using Fraud Hexagon Model in Top Index Shares of KOMPAS 100. 12th International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering (WCSE 2022), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.18178/wcse.2022.06.017

Indonesia, A. of C. F. E. (2019). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019 (Vol. 53, Issue 9). Indonesia Chapter #111. https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/survei-fraud-indonesia/

Kompas.com. (2025). Kasus Investasi Fiktif PT Taspen, Negara Rugi Rp 1 Triliun, Eks Dirut Antonius Kosasih Jadi Tersangka. https://www.kompas.com/jawa-timur/read/2025/04/30/070757188/kasus-investasi-fiktif-pt-taspen-negara-rugi-rp-1-triliun-eks-dirut

Kumparanbisnis.com. (2019). Erick Thohir Mulai Bersih-bersih: Direksi BUMN Harus Siap Dicopot. https://kumparan.com/kumparanbisnis/erick-thohir-mulai-bersih-bersih-direksi-bumn-harus-siap-dicopot-1s9MDkDpbBg/3

Naldo, R. R., & Widuri, R. (2023). Fraudulent Financial Reporting and Fraud Hexagon: Evidence from Infrastructure Companies in ASEAN. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 68(3), 1455–1468. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.3.2023.14

Nugroho, D., & Diyanty, V. (2022). Hexagon Fraud in Fraudulent Financial Statements: The Moderating Role of Audit Committee. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 19(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2022.03

Nurhidayanti, F., Listari, S., & Efrianti, D. (2023). The Effect of Good Corporate Governance on Financial Performance and Firm Value. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 11(1), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v11i1.1769

Preicilia, C., Wahyudi, I., & Preicilia, A. (2022). Financial Statement Fraud Analysis Using the Fraud Hexagon Perspective. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(3), 1467–1479. https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v5i3.2476

Rahmatika, D. N. (2020). Fraud Auditing: Kajian Teoretis dan Empiris (1st ed.). Deepublish.

Ratmono, D., Darsono, D., & Cahyonowati, N. (2020). Financial Statement Fraud Detection with Beneish M-Score and Dechow F-Score Model: An Empirical Analysis of Fraud Pentagon Theory in Indonesia. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(6), 154. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n6p154

Sari, M. P., Mahardika, E., Suryandari, D., & Raharja, S. (2022). The Audit Committee as Moderating the Effect of Hexagon’s Fraud on Fraudulent Financial Statements in Mining Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2150118

Suaranasional.com. (2025). Diduga Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan Rugikan Negara Rp8,3 Triliun, Aktivis Anti-Korupsi Lamongan Desak Kejagung Periksa Direksi PT Pupuk Indonesia. https://suaranasional.com/2025/03/04/diduga-manipulasi-laporan-keuangan-rugikan-negara-rp83-triliun-aktivis-anti-korupsi-lamongan-desak-kejagung-periksa-direksi-pt-pupuk-indonesia/

Sudrajat, S., Suryadnyana, N. A., & Supriadi, T. (2023). Fraud Hexagon: Detection of Fraud of Financial Report in State-Owned Enterprises in Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 9(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v9i1.1358

Sukmadilaga, C., Winarningsih, S., Handayani, T., Herianti, E., & Ghani, E. K. (2022). Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Ministerial and Governmental Institutions in Indonesia: An Analysis Using Hexagon Theory. Economies, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10040086

Syah, S. R., Merdekawaty, E. G., & Jaya, W. N. (2023). Analisis Perencanaan Audit Laporan Keuangan (Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Ardaniah Abbas Kabupaten Gowa Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan). JURNAL ECONOMINA, 2(12), 3656–3673. https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v2i12.1056

Tempo.com. (2023). Bahaya Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan BUMN. https://www.tempo.co/kolom/laporan-keuangan-bumn-823407

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing Theory of Fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. Model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128

Watch, I. C. (2022). Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) 2016-2021.

Widjaya, A. M., & Sidianto, E. (2025). Financial Statement Analysis to Assess the Company’s Financial Stability. 10212–10220.

Published

2026-05-23

How to Cite

Meyrani, H., Ramadhan, Y., Munandar, A., & Wahyuni, E. S. (2026). The Effect of the Fraud Hexagon Model on Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 7(2), 1121–1131. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v7i2.6709

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.