The Influence of Enterprise Risk Management Implementation on Financial Performance and Firm Value in East Asia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v5i5.2871Keywords:
Enterprise Risk Management, Financial Performance, Firm Value, East AsiaAbstract
Risk management is critical for businesses since every organization is accountable for delivering value to stakeholders and developing corporate strategy through management decisions at all levels. As a result, a comprehensive strategy to risk management is required . A solid and effective risk management and internal control system must be implemented in conjunction with good corporate governance. Implementing effective and well-managed risk management will help company to reach the goals, increase the performance, and produce better work. The study examines the impact of Enterprise Risk Management on the financial performance and firm value of selected listed firms in East Asia for the period 2018 to 2022. This research was conducted using data from the Financial Statements of 151 companies that meet the specific criteria and are listed on the Exchange of five East Asian countries. The data was collected from 2018 through 2022. The Multiple Linear Regression model was employed. The research findings suggest that the financial performance of a corporation is positively correlated with the implementation of Enterprise Risk Management.
References
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “Lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Andales, J. (2023). Risk Assessment. Safety Culture. https://safetyculture.com/topics/riskassessment
Annamalah, S., Raman, M., Marthandan, G., & Logeswaran, A. K. (2018). Implementation of enterprise risk management (ERM) framework in enhancing business performances in oil and gas sector. Economies, 6(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6010004
Cabrilo, S., & Leung, R. (2019). Do leaders really matter in knowledge management practices? Case of Serbian Companies. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 15(4), 94-113.
Chan, K. C., Chen, Y., & Liu, B. (2021). The linear and non-linear effects of internal control and its five components on corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese firms using the COSO framework. European Accounting Review, 30(4), 733-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1776626
Chang, Y., & Hu, J. (2020). Analysis on the mode of multinational retail enterprises entering Chinese market—Take Walmart, Carrefour and Metro as examples. Modern Economy, 11(01), 97720. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2020.111003
COSO (2004), Enterprise Risk Management Framework, Committee of Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission.
Etori, N. A., & Alilah, D. A. (2020). Impact of knowledge management on organizational performance: A case of US retail firms. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(2).
Gumanti TA. 2009. Teori Sinyal Manajemen Keuangan, Usahawan. 6 (38)
Hanggraeni, D. (2015). Manajemen risiko perusahaan (enterprise risk management) dan Good Corporate Governance. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Hanggraeni D. (2021). Manjemen Risiko Bisnis dan ESG Teori dan Hasil, Bogor: IPB Press
Heiligtag S, Schlosser A, Stegemann U (2014). Enterprise-risk-management practices: Where’s the evidence?
Hindasah, L., & Harsono, M. (2021). Gender diversity on the board of director and firm performance: agency theory perspective. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 12(2), 214-235. https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.v12i2.10804
Hoyt and Liebenberg (2011) Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The value of enterprise risk management. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795-822. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01413.x
Hu, J., Weng, Y.-C., & Wang, F. (2021). The effect of the internal control regulation on reporting quality in China. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21(4), 394-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.12.006
Ibrahim, S. M., & Hanggraeni, D. (2021). Disperse of ownership, liquidity, and firm value: Evidence from indonesia. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(12), 4471-4478.
International Standard Organization (ISO) 31000:2018 Risk Management Guidelines (RMG)
Iswajuni, I., Manasikana, A., & Soetedjo, S. (2018). The effect of enterprise risk management (ERM) on firm value in manufacturing companies listed on indonesian stock exchange year 2010-2013. AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research) (Online), 3(2), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0006
Jensen and Mechling (1976) Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2004;2007;). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. In D. A. Wittman (Ed.), Economic analysis of the law (pp. 162-176). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752135.ch17
Jureid, J. (2016). Manajemen resiko bank Islam (penanganan pembiayaan bermasalah dalam produk pembiayaan pada PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia cabang pembantu Panyabungan) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara)
Khalil, M. I., Haque, R., bin S Senathirajah, A. R., Chowdhury, B., & Ahmed, S. (2022a). Factors Affecting the Growth of SMEs in Bangladesh: A Structured Equation Modeling Approach. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 14(3), 578-593. https://doi.org/10.34109/ijebeg.202214128
Gius, D., Mieszala, J., Panayiotou, E., & Poppensieker, T. (2018). Value and resilience through better risk management. McKinsey Insights,
Misbah, M. (2017). Asesmen Maturitas Manajemen Risiko Perusahaan Pada Kontraktor Kecil Dan Menengah. Jurnal Teknik Mesin Mercu Buana, 6(2), 147-154.
Najah, E. A., & Omar, T. (2018). The contribution of internal audit to the improvement of internal control system. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14(7), 200-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n7p200
O' Brien, K (2003). Neither Transgressive Nor Contained: Boundary-Spanning Contention In China. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.8.1.6543n6m111722u42
Olayinka, E., Emoarehi, E., Jonah, A., & Ame, J. (2017). Enterprise risk management and financial performance: Evidence from emerging market. International Journal of Management, Accounting & Economics, 4(9), 937-952
Radner, R., & Shepp, L. (1996). Risk vs. profit potential: A model for corporate strategy. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 20(8), 1373-1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(95)00904-3
Oliveira, J. B., Jin, M., Lima, R. S., Kobza, J. E., & Montevechi, J. A. B. (2019). The role of simulation and optimization methods in supply chain risk management: Performance and review standpoints. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 92, 17-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.11.007
Savitri, E., Ary Gumanti, T., & Yulinda, N. (2020). Enterprise risk-based management disclosures and firm value of indonesian finance companies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 414-422. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.33
Soetedjo, S., & Sugianto, A. (2018). Penerapan Coso Erm Integrated Framework Dalam Mendukung Audit Forensik Untuk Menanggulangi Tindakan Kecurangan. Journal of Applied Managerial Accounting, 2(2), 262-274.
Selamat, M. H., & Ibrahim, O. (2018). The moderating effect of risk culture in relationship between leadership and enterprise risk management implementation in Malaysia. culture, 9(1).
Spence M, 1973 Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 87(3); 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Thomson Reuters (2017), Thomson Reuters ESG Scores, Thomson Reuters EIKON
Viscelli, T. R., Beasley, M. S., & Hermanson, D. R. (2016). Research insights about risk governance: Implications from a review of ERM research. SAGE Open, 6(4), 215824401668023. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680230
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tiurma Natasha, Rofikoh Rokhim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA).
