TRANSFORMATIONAL, AUTHENTIC, AND AUTHORITARIAN TYPES OF LEADERSHIP: WHICH ONE IS THE MOST INFLUENTIAL IN STAFFS’ PERFORMANCE (A Study On Performance In A Religious School Setting)

Main Article Content

Rubi Mirayani
S.Williana Kusumaningsih
Anggaripeni Mustikasiwi
Agus Purwanto

Abstract

The research conducted in a religion based school in Gading-Serpong, Jakarta was conducted to determine the significance of leadership style toward the organizational culture and motivation in order to see the influence on the staff’s performance. Data obtained through questionnaires with total sampling method of 33 out of 34 employees. Data analysis is using Spearman Rank correlation analysis, correlation, and hypothesis testing. The result of the study showed that (1) the authentic leadership style is perceived higher than authoritarian and transformational leadership styles (2) The leadership style has a significant influence on the school staff’s motivation. This is indicated on the result of P-value that is 0.0000.(3) The leadership style does have an influence on the organizational culture as the the P value between dependent variable Leadership (KP) to independent variable Performance (KJ) with the intervening variable Culture Organization (BO) is 0.004 and it means there specific Indirect Effect is accepted since it is less than 0.005. whereas the P value between the dependent variable Leadership (KP) to independent variable Performance (KJ) with the intervening variable Motivation (MO) is 0.124. (4) The leadership style has also showed to have significant influence and direct effect on the staff’s performance. This is depicted by the result of the P values that is 0.001, which explained that leadership has a significant and direct effect on the workers’ performance, (5) The organizational culture has an influence toward the staff’s performance as based on the data, from all the result of the R-square for the Organizational culture (BO) is 0.56; that organizational culture as the intervening variable by 56% and (6) the staff’s motivation does not affect the staff’s performance as shown on the the P value is 0,082 which is more than 0.05, therefore Motivation of the staff does not affect the performance of the staff directly.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mirayani, R., S.Williana Kusumaningsih, Anggaripeni Mustikasiwi, & Purwanto, A. (2019). TRANSFORMATIONAL, AUTHENTIC, AND AUTHORITARIAN TYPES OF LEADERSHIP: WHICH ONE IS THE MOST INFLUENTIAL IN STAFFS’ PERFORMANCE (A Study On Performance In A Religious School Setting). Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 1(2), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v1i2.68
Section
Articles

References

Alavi,Seyyed Babak and Gill, Carol, 2016. Leading Change Authentically: How Authentic Leaders Influence Follower Responses to Complex Change. ournal of
Leadership & Organizational Studies, Issue DOI: 10.1177/1548051816664681, pp. 1-15.
Al-Musadieq, Muhammad, Nurjannah, Raharjo, Kusdi,Solimun and Fernandes, Adji Achmad Rinaldo, 2018. "The mediating effect of work motivation on the influence of job design and organizational. Journal of Management Development, 10( Emerald Publishing Limited).
Anon., n.d.
Beverly Alimo-Metcalfe and Robert J. Alban-Metcalfe, 2001. The development of a new Transformational Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 74(The British Psychological Society), pp. 1-27.
Bosch, D., 2013. The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Leader-Follower Work Value Congruence. International Journal of Business and Social Research
(IJBSR),, Volume vol. 3 no 8, pp. 18-31.
Chukwusa, J., 2019. Autocratic Leadership Style: Obstacle to Success in Academic Libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice e-Journal, Issue DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Chu, L.-C., 2013. The moderating role of authoritarian leadership on the relationship between the internalization of emotional regulation and the well-being of employees. Leadership, Issue DOI: 10.1177/1742715013498403, p. 1–18.
Corbin, B., 2000. Entrepreneurial Leadership: Fundamentals. Carmel: Corbin Group Publishing.
Erkutlu, H., 2008. The impact of transformational leadership on organizational and leadership effectiveness. Journal of Management Development, Vol. 27 (No. 7), pp. 708-726.
Fachreza, Said Musnadi, M. Shabri Abd Majid, 2018. Pegaruh Motivasi kerja,Lingkungan Kerja,Dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dan Dampaknya Pada Kinerja Bank. jurnal Magister Manajemen ISSN 2302-0199.
Fadhil, Achmar dan Mayowan, Yuniadi, 2018. Pengaruh Motovasi Kerja dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan AJB Bumiputra. Jurnal (JAB) , vol 54 (no 1). Kotzé, Martina and Nel, Petrus, 2017. Personal factor effects on authentic leadership. Journal of Psychology in Africa, Vol. 27, No. 1(Africa Scholarship Development Enterprize), p. 47–53.
Lee, C. S., 2018. Authentic Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness: The Roles of Hope, Grit, and Growth Mindset. International Journal of Pure and Applied
Mathematic, Volume 118 no 19(Special), pp. 383-401.
Mboya,Millicent Atieno , Were,Susan and Otieno,Romanus Odhiambo , Month: October 2017 - March 2018. EFFECT OF AUTOCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING IN KENYA. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations , Volume Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 1214-1225.
MUHUMUZA, M. V., 2015. THE INFLUENCE OF AUTHORITARIAN LEADERSHIP ON SOCIAL, POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ZAMBIA AND SINGAPORE, s.l.: TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF KENYA.
Theodora, O., 2015. Pengaruh Motovasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT Sejahtera Motor Gemilang. Jurnal AGORA Vol 3. no 2.
ZYLFIJAJ, KUJTIM, REXHEPI, LURA and GRUBI, ARTA KOKA, 2014. Authoritarian Leadership VS. Participative Leadership in Organizations, Bologna: Studiorum University.