Determinants of iGeneration Reporter Satisfaction in the State Officials’ Wealth Report System with Perceived Usefulness as a Mediating Variable

Authors

  • Pangeran Tungkir Silalahi Universitas Gunadarma, Depok, Indonesia.
  • Henny Medyawati Universitas Gunadarma, Depok, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v7i3.7172

Keywords:

Digital Service Quality, iGeneration, Perceived Usefulness, Reporter Satisfaction, State Officials’ Wealth Report System

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of iGeneration reporter satisfaction in the State Officials’ Wealth Report System, with perceived usefulness positioned as a mediating variable. The determinants analyzed include digital service quality with a Customer Relationship Management orientation, which is formed by system quality, information quality, and service quality. The study responds to the need to evaluate mandatory public digital reporting systems not only by technical availability but also by user-perceived quality, usefulness, and satisfaction. A quantitative explanatory design was employed using questionnaire data from 300 iGeneration respondents who had used the State Officials’ Wealth Report System, electronically implemented through e-LHKPN. Digital service quality was modeled as a reflective-formative higher-order construct formed by system quality, information quality, and service quality. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling with a disjoint two-stage approach. The results show that digital service quality has a positive and significant effect on perceived usefulness and reporter satisfaction. Perceived usefulness also positively affects reporter satisfaction and significantly mediates the relationship between digital service quality and reporter satisfaction in a complementary pattern. The findings indicate that improving e-LHKPN satisfaction requires the integration of reliable system performance, accurate information, responsive service support, and clear user-perceived benefits.

References

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Buttle, F., & Maklan, S. (2019). Customer relationship management: Concepts and technologies (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351016551

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Ibrahim, M., Emmanuel, C., Yeboah, D., & Kumah, A. (2025). The influence of digital technologies on quality service delivery in the public sector: The mediating role of service expectation. Future Business Journal, 11, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00579-7

Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Ruseva, M., Dzhabarova, Y., Zhekova, V., Klisarova-Belcheva, S., Mollova, T., & Dimitrov, A. (2024). Factors influencing user perception and adoption of e-government services. Administrative Sciences, 14(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030054

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2024). Peraturan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2024 tentang perubahan kedua atas Peraturan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Nomor 07 Tahun 2016 tentang tata cara pendaftaran, pengumuman, dan pemeriksaan harta kekayaan penyelenggara negara.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2025). Laporan tahunan KPK 2025. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi-data/laporan/laporan-tahunan

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2026, March 25). Jelang tenggat pelaporan, KPK serukan percepatan kewajiban LHKPN. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/ruang-informasi/berita/jelang-tenggat-pelaporan-kpk-serukan-percepatan-kewajiban-lhkpn

Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2020). Service quality, perceived value, and citizens' continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China. Information & Management, 57(3), 103197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103197

Luo, C., Hasan, N. A. M., & Ahmad, A. M. Z. B. (2024). Exploring satisfaction and trust as key drivers of e-government continuance intention: Evidence from China for sustainable digital governance. Sustainability, 16(24), 11124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411124

Nookhao, S., & Kiattisin, S. (2023). Achieving a successful e-government: Determinants of behavioral intention from Thai citizens' perspective. Heliyon, 9(8), e18944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18944

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405

Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2005). A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.167

Petter, S., DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2013). Information systems success: The quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7–62. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290401

Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Le, M. T. T., & Nguyen, N. L. (2023). E-government service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: Evidence from a newly emerging country. Journal of Public Policy, 43(4), 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X23000296

Pramuditha, R., Muhafidin, D., Sumaryana, A., & Susanti, E. (2024). Exploring the impacts of e-government service quality on citizen satisfaction and trust: Evidence from population administration services. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(10), 7517. https://www.aasmr.org/liss/Vol.11/No.8/Vol.11.No.8.17.pdf

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Priporas, C.-V., Stylos, N., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2017). Generation Z consumers' expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.058

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003

Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240

Siwi, T. P. U., & Nawawi, Z. (2023). Building citizen satisfaction towards e-government services: A conceptual framework. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 6(2), 253–265. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/jmpp/article/view/46471/0

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

Published

2026-08-20

How to Cite

Silalahi, P. T., & Medyawati, H. (2026). Determinants of iGeneration Reporter Satisfaction in the State Officials’ Wealth Report System with Perceived Usefulness as a Mediating Variable. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 7(3), 2414–2422. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v7i3.7172

Similar Articles

<< < 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.