Efficiency Analysis of Public Service Obligation (PSO) Sea Transportation Routes in Indonesia: A Case Study of PT Pelni (Persero)

Authors

  • Nuraini Dessy Winiastuty Institut Transportasi dan Logistik, Trisakti, Jakata, Indonesia.
  • Yahya Kuncoro Institut Transportasi dan Logistik, Trisakti, Jakata, Indonesia.
  • Olfebri Institut Transportasi dan Logistik, Trisakti, Jakata, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v7i3.7116

Keywords:

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Public Service Obligation (PSO), operational efficiency, shipping routes, PT PELNI (Persero), maritime transportation

Abstract

Maritime transportation under the Public Service Obligation (PSO) scheme plays a strategic role in ensuring interregional connectivity, particularly in Indonesia's disadvantaged, frontier, outermost, and border (3TP) areas. However, variations in the operational efficiency of PT PELNI (Persero)'s passenger ship routes may reduce the effectiveness of government subsidy utilization. This study aims to measure the operational efficiency of PSO passenger shipping routes, identify efficient and inefficient routes, and formulate operational improvement recommendations. A quantitative approach was employed using the Input-Oriented CCR Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model on 26 Decision Making Units (DMUs) representing PT PELNI (Persero)'s PSO passenger vessels. The input variables consist of fuel consumption, operating costs, and the number of crew members, while the output variables include the number of passengers, cargo volume, and sailing frequency. The results indicate that six vessels achieved full efficiency with a DEA score of 1.00, while the remaining twenty vessels were found to be relatively inefficient. The DEA analysis reveals that inefficiency primarily results from suboptimal utilization of operational inputs relative to the outputs produced. Based on the DEA projections, the study identified potential efficiency improvements, including a reduction of 37,599,416 liters (19%) in fuel consumption, operating cost savings of IDR 744.57 billion (18%), and optimization of 458 crew members (20%), without reducing the number of passengers, cargo volume, or sailing frequency. These findings demonstrate that DEA is an effective evaluation tool for identifying sources of operational inefficiency and achieving improvement targets to support route optimization, enhance operational performance, and provide evidence-based recommendations for a more effective, efficient, and performance-oriented PSO policy.

References

Bartosiewicz, A. (2024). Efficiency analysis of maritime transport systems using DEA-SBM approach.

Budiman, H., & Kurniawan, A. (2023). Efficiency of maritime transportation subsidies in Indonesia: A DEA approach. Journal of Maritime Transportation.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research.

Chen, X., & Wang, S. (2021). Fare competition and capital shift among transportation options: A behavioral analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 147, 46–61.

Duygun, M., et al. (2020). Port efficiency in emerging markets: A DEA approach.

Emrouznejad, A. (2025). Development and evolution of slacks-based measure models in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys.

Guo, X., Xu, Y., & Liu, S. (2023). Factors affecting passenger ship load factors: Route design, pricing, and capital integration. Maritime Policy & Management, 50(4), 565–580.

Krmac, E., & Mansouri Kaleibar, M. (2023). A comprehensive review of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology in port efficiency evaluation. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 25(4), 817–881. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00239-5

Li, Z., & Hensher, D. A. (2022). Marketing strategies and pricing in multi-modal transport systems: Impacts on demand and occupancy. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 163, 102784.

Liu, F. F. F., & Shih, S. C. (2023). Data Envelopment Analysis models or the virtual gap analysis model: Which should be used for identifying the best benchmark for each unit in a group?

Nong, N.-M. T. (2023). Performance efficiency assessment of Vietnamese ports: An application of Delphi with Kamet principles and DEA model. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 39(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2022.10.002

Nong, T. N.-M., & Ha, D.-S. (2023). Port efficiency evaluation: An application of AHP and Malmquist DEA model. Journal of Distribution Science, 21(11), 55–66.

Park, K. H. (2018). DEA and transportation efficiency. In Handbook of International Trade and Transportation.

Rinaldi, Y., & Budiman, H. (2022). Efficiency analysis of maritime transportation subsidy routes. Indonesian Journal of Maritime Transportation.

Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis.

Van de Velde, D. (2013). Public service obligations in public transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 39(1), 32–40.

Yan, R., Wang, S., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2021). Data analytics for fuel consumption management in maritime transportation: Status and perspectives. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

Published

2026-08-25

How to Cite

Winiastuty, N. D., Kuncoro, Y., & Olfebri, O. (2026). Efficiency Analysis of Public Service Obligation (PSO) Sea Transportation Routes in Indonesia: A Case Study of PT Pelni (Persero). Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 7(3), 2516–2529. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v7i3.7116

Similar Articles

<< < 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.