Measuring Tom and Tol Elasticity in Forced Sales Auctions: Lessons Learned from Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v6i5.5666Keywords:
Time-on-the-market (TOM) elasticity, time-on-the-market (TOM) elasticity, real estate, auctions, foreclosureAbstract
While many studies have explored the relationship between time-on-the-market (TOM) and price, few have looked at time-on-the-liquidation (TOL). This study measures TOM and TOL elasticity in real estate auctions, analyzing data from 12 State Assets and Auction Service Offices between 2021 and mid-2023 using convenience sampling. The results show TOM elasticity for forced sales is elt=1, while TOL elasticity is elt=0. TOM elasticity responds to price changes, but TOL does not. Lower auction prices affect TOM elasticity, but not TOL. To make TOL elasticity dynamic, regulatory changes allowing for flexible TOL could be introduced.
References
Björklund, K., Alex Dadzie, J., & Wilhelmsson, M. (2006). Offer price, transaction price and time‐on‐market. Property Management, 24(4), 415–426.
Boccaletti, S. (2021). Asset Specificity and the Secondary Market for Productive Assets. Italian Economic Journal, 7(3), 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-020-00136-x
Campbell, J. Y., Giglio, S., & Pathak, P. (2011). Forced sales and house prices. American Economic Review, 101(5), 2108–2131.
Chen, F. Y., Liang, J. H., & Chan, N. (2013). Time on the market and sale price of non-performing loan assets. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 19(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2013.11104380
Guren, A. M. (2018). House price momentum and strategic complementarity. Journal of Political Economy, 126(3), 1172–1218.
Hayunga, D. K., & Pace, R. K. (2019a). The Impact of TOM on Prices in the US Housing Market. In Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics (Vol. 58, Issue 3). The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-018-9657-0
Hayunga, D. K., & Pace, R. K. (2019b). The impact of TOM on prices in the US housing market. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 58, 335–365.
Hungria-Gunnelin, R., Kopsch, F., & Enegren, C. J. (2020). Brokers’ list price setting in an auction context. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 14(3), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-04-2020-0034
International Valuation Standards Council. (2017). International Valuation Standards.
Jandásková, T., Hrdlicka, T., Cupal, M., Kleparnik, P., Komosná, M., & Kervitcer, M. (2020). Technical condition of houses: a framework for the Czech market. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 16(7), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-07-2022-0106
Jindal, N. (2020). The Impact of Advertising and R&D on Bankruptcy Survival: A Double-Edged Sword. Journal of Marketing, 84(5), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920936205
Knight, J. R. (2002). Listing price, time on market, and ultimate selling price: Causes and effects of listing price changes. Real Estate Economics, 30(2), 213–237.
Kuo, C. T., Yuan, Y. H., Gao, W. Z., & Jao, C. N. (2023). The Impact of Recognized Features of Uncomfortable Houses on Auction Prices: A Chinese Cultural Perspective. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231217901
Michaletz, V. B., & Artemenkov, A. (2018). A demand-and supply-side constrained model for liquidation value and related exposure periods. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 26(2), 48–59.
Montalvo, J. G., & Raya, J. M. (2023). A comparison of banks and real estate intermediaries as house sellers. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 38(3), 1385–1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09994-6
Nikiforou, P., Dimopoulos, T., & Sivitanides, P. (2022). Identifying how the time on the market affects the selling price: a case study of residential properties in Paphos (Cyprus) urban area. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 15(3), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-11-2021-0051
Paliński, A. (2018). Loan payment and renegotiation: The role of the liquidation value. Argumenta Oeconomica, 40(1), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2018.1.10
Pelizza, M., & Schenk-Hoppé, K. R. (2020). Pricing Defaulted Italian Mortgages. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13020031
Pennington-Cross, A. (2006). The value of foreclosed property. Journal of Real Estate Research, 28(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2006.12091177
Taylor, C. R. (1999). Time-on-the-Market as a Sign of Quality. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(3), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00098
Wickramaarachchi, N. C., Chandani, S. K., & Thilini, M. (2021). Key determinants of time on the market: an analysis of residential housing market in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 14(5), 913–935. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-06-2020-0071
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Doni Triono, Nurbiyanto Nurbiyanto, Sakti Prabowo, Andi Raffiwan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA).
