Key Success Factors of Risk Management in the Procurement Process to Support the Domestic Product Utilization Enhancement Program

Authors

  • Tri Oktaviyani Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Rochmad Nur Afsdy Saksono Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Neneng Sri Rahayu Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v6i4.4841

Keywords:

key success factor, risk management, procurement, domestic product

Abstract

The domestic product usage policy can be strategically implemented through government procurement activities. In order to guarantee that every step of the procurement process is transparent, accountable, and in accordance with the direction of the domestic product usage policy, risk management is an essential component. The objective of this research is to determine and rank various key success factors (KSFs) for risk management in the procurement process in government institutions. This research was conducted in two stages, namely: (1) literature review, to identify the suitable KSF in a government context, and (2) Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), to prioritize KSFs based on the highest weight value. This study found that the priorities of KSFs for risk management in the procurement process to support the domestic product utilization enhancement program are (1) management commitment, (2) risk-aware culture, (3) business process integration, (4) adequate resources, (5) effective communication, and (6) training.

References

AbuMoeilak, L., AlQuraidi, A., AlZarooni, A., & Beheiry, S. (2023). Critical Success Factors for Building Information Modeling Implementation as a Sustainable Construction Practice in the UAE. Buildings, 13(6), 1406.

Accettola, P. (2024). The Importance of Ongoing Training Investment in Employees. https://trainingindustry.com/articles/onboarding/the-importance-of-ongoing-training-investment-in-employees/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Alazzabi, W. Y. E., Mustafa, H., & Karage, A. I. (2023). Risk Management, Top Management Support, Internal Audit Activities and Fraud Mitigation. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(2), 569–582.

Alijoyo, F. A., & Munawar, Y. (2019). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Maturitas Manajemen Risiko Organisasi di Indonesia. Bina Ekonomi, 23(1), 67–79.

Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011). Sustainable Procurement in The Public Sector: An International Comparative Study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(4), 452–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111119551

Darmada, D.K. (2022). Mengupas Tingkat Komponen Dalam Negeri (TKDN) Pada Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah (Studi Imperatif Pengadaan IT Kanwil Kemenkumham NTB). Jurnal Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa (JPBJ). 1(1), 97-107

Mamesah, D., Supit, C., & Rondonuwu, S. (2022). Analisis Risiko dan Mitigasi PBJP. Jurnal Ilmiah Media Engineering, 12(1), 67–80.

Maulana, M. R., Tinangon, J. J., & Wokas, H. R. (2021). Pengendalian Internal Melalui Risk Assesment Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa pada Dinas Perumahan Rakyat dan Kawasan Pemukiman Kabupaten Tolitoli. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing “GOODWILL,” 12(2), 482–491.

Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Indonesia (2020) Buku Pedoman Peningkatan Produk Dalam Negeri. Jakarta: Kementerian Perindustrian

Oliveira, K., Méxas, M., Meiriño, M., & Drumond, G. (2018). Critical Success Factors Associated with The Implementation of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Risk Research, 22(8), 1004–1019.

Oluleye, I.B., Ogunleye, M.B. & Oyetunji, A.K. (2021). Evaluation of the critical success factors for sustainable housing delivery: analytic hierarchy process approach. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19 (5), 1044-1062.

Phu, T. Q. (2017). Enterprise Risk Management Implementation: The Critical Success Factors for Vietnamese Construction Companies. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Studies (JMESS), 3(2), 2458–2925.

Saaty (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal Services Sciences, 1(2), 83-98.

Setiyarto, A., & Rapiyadi, P. (2022). Analisis Manajemen Risiko pada Perencanaan Pengadaan dalam Variabel Identifikasi Kebutuhan Barang dan Jasa pada Kementerian Energi dan Sumberdaya Mineral. Jurnal Aparatur, 6(2), 95–106.

Sihotang, R. L. C. (2022). Identifikasi Risiko dalam Aktivitas Pengadaan Barang di Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika. Jurnal Pengadaan Indonesia, 1(2), 35–44.

Sinkuq, P.P., Gandhi, D., Pradhan, S. Biswal, S., Agarwal, A. & Walia, A. (2023). Make in India: Challenges and Opportunities. IRE Journals. 6(10). 201 – 214

Tavana, M., Soltanifar, M. & Santos-Arteaga, F.J. (2023). Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution. Annals of Operations Research 326, 879–907.

Wulandari, R. (2013). Evaluasi Sistem Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) Berbasis Manajemen Risiko. ABIS: Accounting and Business Information Systems Journal, 1(1), 1–14.

Wulandari, R. (2013). Evaluasi Sistem Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) Berbasis Manajemen Risiko. ABIS: Accounting and Business Information Systems Journal, 1(1), 1–14.

Yaraghi, N., & Langhe, R. G. (2011). Critical Success Factors for Risk Management Systems. Journal of Risk Research, 14(5), 551–581.

Yuhanah, Y., & Rohana, O. (2021). Identifikasi Risiko E-Purchasing Dalam Aktivitas Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa di Politeknik Negeri Bandung. Sigma-Mu, 13(2), 15–22.

Zaid, A.A., Saleh, Y. & Tomeh, A.J. (2025). Identifying the success factors for TQM implementation among automotive spare parts companies using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): evidence from Palestine. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(4), 743-762.

Zhao et al., 2013 Zhao, X., Hwang, B. G., & Low, S. P. (2013). Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Risk Management in Chinese Construction Companies. Construction Management and Economics, 31(12), 1199–1214.

Published

2025-08-25

How to Cite

Oktaviyani, T., Saksono, R. N. A., & Rahayu , N. S. (2025). Key Success Factors of Risk Management in the Procurement Process to Support the Domestic Product Utilization Enhancement Program. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 6(4), 3186–3199. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v6i4.4841

Similar Articles

<< < 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.