The Effect of Workplace Social Support (Supervisor and Co-Worker Support) on Job Performance With Work Engagement As A Mediator (A Study of LPSE UO Operators ff The Tni Headquarters)

P.Y. Deni Hermawan; Andreo Wahyudi  Atmoko

doi:10.38035/dijefa.v6i1.3868

Authors

P.Y. Deni Hermawan Universitas Indonesia
Andreo Wahyudi Atmoko Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v6i1.3868

Keywords:

Workplace Social Support, Job Performance, Work Engagement

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the direct influence between supervisor support and job performance on LPSE operators of UO Mabes TNI Work Unit, and to analyze the direct influence between co-worker support and job performance on LPSE operators of UO Mabes TNI Work Unit. This study also aims to analyze the direct influence between supervisor support and work engagement on LPSE operators of UO Mabes TNI Work Unit, and the direct influence between co-worker support and work engagement on LPSE operators of UO Mabes TNI Work Unit. In addition, this study aims to analyze the direct influence of work engagement on job performance on LPSE operators of UO Mabes TNI Work Unit. Another objective is to analyze the indirect influence between supervisor support and job performance mediated by work engagement on LPSE operators of UO Mabes TNI Work Unit, and to analyze the indirect influence between co-worker support and job performance mediated by work engagement on LPSE operators of UO Mabes TNI Work Unit. This study adopts a positivist paradigm that focuses on finding the truth through an empirical and measurable approach, with an ontological view of realism that believes that reality can be expressed with clear evidence and can be tested scientifically. The methodology used is mixed methods, which combines quantitative and qualitative approaches to obtain more comprehensive and valid data. This study adopts an explanatory research type to explain the causal relationship between the variables studied and test existing theories. Based on this study, it is concluded that the results of the research data analysis show several important findings. First, there is no direct influence between support from superiors (supervisor support) and job performance on LPSE operators in the UO Mabes TNI Work Unit environment. Likewise, there is no direct influence between co-worker support and job performance on the same LPSE operators. However, support from superiors is proven to have a direct influence on the work engagement of LPSE operators, as well as support from co-workers which has a direct effect on the level of work engagement. In addition, it was found that work engagement has a significant direct effect on the job performance of LPSE operators. Furthermore, the results of the study also showed an indirect effect between support from superiors on job performance mediated by work engagement. The same thing was also found in co-worker support, which has an indirect effect on job performance, with work engagement as the mediator.

References

Bakker, A. B. (2009). Building engagement in the workplace. In R.J. Burke & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), The Peak Performing Organization (pp. 50-72). Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Bakker, A.B. & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a Model of Work Engagement. Career Development International. 13 (13). 209-223.

Bakker, A.B., & Leiter, M.P. (2010). Work engagement: a handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.

Bakker, A.B., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 147154. doi: 10.1002/job.515.

Chin W.W. (2000). Partial Least Squares for Researcher: An Overview and Prosentation of Recent Advances Using the PLS Approach, http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/icis96.pdf diakses pada 23 Juni 2024.

Creswell, J. (2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Creswell, J. (2010). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed (Edisi III). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J.W & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publication, Inc.

Demerouti, E., Derks, D., Lieke, L. and Bakker, A.B. (2014). New ways of working: impact on working conditions, work–family balance, and well-being. dalam Korunka, C. and Hoonakker, P. (Eds). Then Impact of ICT on Quality of Working Life. Springer: Dordrecht. 123-141.

Ghozali. I. (2015). Partial Least Squares: Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris Edisi 2. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gilovich, T., Keltner, D. & Nisbett, R.E. (2006). Social Psychology. New York: W. W. Norton.

Hair, J.F., dkk. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31 (1). 2-24.

Humas Kemenko Polhukam RI. (2020). Deputi Kominfotur: Reformasi Birokrasi Tak Lepas dari Lingkungan Politik. Diakses pada 1 Februari 2023 dari https://www.merdeka.com/jateng/tujuan-reformasi-birokrasi-yang-berlaku-di-indonesia-perlu-diketahui-kln.html.

Marantika, T. S. & Parahyanti, E. (2021). Work Engagement as a Mediator of the Influence of Co-worker Support on Task Performance of Indonesian Army (TNI-AD) Soldiers Serving in Vulnerable Areas (Papua). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(4), 7693-7702.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 34 Tahun 2004 tentang Tentara Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2018). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Pelin, I. I. & Osoian, C. (2021). Co-workers Support and Job Performance. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Oeconomica. 66(2). 74-86.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 81 Tahun 2020 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010-2025. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara

Panglima TNI. (2019). Peraturan Panglima TNI No. 75 Tahun 2019 tentang Organisasi dan Tugas Pusat Pengadaan TNI. Jakarta: Sekretariat Umum TNI

Prabandari, A.I. (2020). Tujuan Reformasi Birokrasi yang Berlaku di Indonesia, Perlu Diketahui. Diakses pada 1 Februari 2023 dari https://www.merdeka.com/jateng/tujuan-reformasi-birokrasi-yang-berlaku-di-indonesia-perlu-diketahui-kln.html

Ramos-Villagrasa, P.J., Barrada, J.R., Fernandez-del-Rio, E., & Koopmans, L. (2019). Assessing Job Performance Using Brief Self-report Scales: The Case of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 35 (3). 195-205.

Rusfiana, Y. & Supriatna, C. (2021). Memahami Birokrasi Pemerintahan dan Perkembangannya. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sedgwick, P.M. (2013). Convenience Sampling. BMJ Clinical Research. 1-3.

Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study. Eduational and Psychological Measurement. 66 (4). 701-716.

Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A.B. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Occupational health psychology unit. Utrecht: Utrecht University.

Talebzadeh, N & Karatepe, O.M. (2020). Workplace social support, Work Engagement and Their Impacts on Multiple Performance Outcomes. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 69 (6). 1227-1245.

Triplet, N. (1898). The Dynamogenic Factors in Pacemaking and Competition. The American Journal of Psychology, 9 (4): 507-533.

Zajonc, R.B. & Sales, R.M. (1966). Social Facilitation of Dominant and Subordinate Responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2(2): 160-168.