Dynamics of Organizational Culture: The Influence of Manipulative Behavior and Social Interaction in Private Universities

Authors

  • Welly Yulianti Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Yunia Wardi Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Sulastri Sulastri Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Rino Rino Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v5i5.3582

Keywords:

manipulative behavior, social interaction and organizational culture

Abstract

This study aims to identify the influence of manipulative behavior and social interaction on organizational culture. Referring to previous literature and research, manipulative behavior can change organizational culture, this is also based on social interaction within the organization. The quantitative method was chosen to provide an analysis related to manipulative behavior and social interaction on organizational culture by involving a sample of 140 people. The results of this study indicate that manipulative behavior carried out ethically can improve teamwork and communication, and strengthen organizational culture. However, balance is very important, because too much manipulation can have a negative impact. These findings are expected to enable managers to develop strategies that balance ethical manipulation and positive work culture.

References

Albert-Laszlo Barabási. (2016). Network Science. Cambridge University Press.

Bloom, P. (2021). The Sweet Spot: How to Find Your Groove at Home and Work. New York: HarperCollins.

Cheng, Y. C. (1993). Profiles of Organizational Culture and Effective Schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(2), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345930040201

Cialdini, R. B., & Sagarin, B. J. (2021). Influence: Science and Practice (7th ed). Boston: Pearson.

Daniels, H. (2012). Institutional culture, social interaction and learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.02.001

Fogg, B. J. (2019). Tiny Habits: The Small Changes That Change Everything. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines For Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

Muhammad Fathoni. (2018). Interaksi Sosial dalam Konteks Globalisasi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 22(1), 45–60.

Naseer, S., Bouckenooghe, D., Syed, F., Khan, A. K., & Qazi, S. (2020). The malevolent side of organizational identification: unraveling the impact of psychological entitlement and manipulative personality on unethical work behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09623-0

Pilch, I., & Turska, E. (2015). Relationships Between Machiavellianism, Organizational Culture, and Workplace Bullying: Emotional Abuse from the Target’s and the Perpetrator’s Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2081-3

Sihite, M., Albanjari, F. R., Sinurat, E. J., Kustina, K. T., Sudarijati, Andriani, J., … Sitanggang, R. (2023). MSDM (Menyongsong Era Disrupsi) (Hartini, ed.). Bandung: CV. Media Sains Indonesia.

Sondang P Siagian. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Kedua Pulu). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Zheng, W., Wu, Y. C. J., Chen, X. C., & Lin, S. J. (2017). Why do employees have counterproductive work behavior? The role of founder’s Machiavellianism and the corporate culture in China. Management Decision, 55(3), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2016-0696

Downloads

Published

2024-12-07

How to Cite

Yulianti, W., Wardi, Y., Sulastri, S., & Rino, R. (2024). Dynamics of Organizational Culture: The Influence of Manipulative Behavior and Social Interaction in Private Universities. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance &Amp; Accounting, 5(5), 5352–5356. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v5i5.3582