The Effect of Auditor Experience, Client Business Understanding, and Auditor Professional Skepticism on Fraud Detection Ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v5i3.3015Keywords:
Auditor Experience, Client Business Understanding, Professional Skepticism, Fraud Detection AbilityAbstract
This study analyzes the influence of auditor experience, client business understanding, and auditor professional skepticism on fraud detection ability at Public Accounting Firms (KAP) in Bali. The theoretical frameworks applied include the Fraud Triangle Theory and Attribution Theory. The study involved 71 auditors selected through purposive sampling. Data was collected using direct distribution of questionnaires. Analysis utilized multiple linear regression with SPSS 26. Findings demonstrate that auditor experience, client business understanding, and auditor professional skepticism positively affect fraud detection ability.
References
Agustina, F., Nurkholis, N., & Rusydi, M. (2021). Auditors’ professional skepticism and fraud detection. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 10(4), 275–287.
Awaluddin, M., & Wardhani, R. S. (2019). The Effect Of Expert Management, Professional Skepticism And Professional Ethics On Auditors Detecting Ability With Emotional Intelligence As Modeling Variables (Study At The Makassar City Inspectorate). International Journal of Islamic Business and Economics (IJIBEC), 3(1), 37–50.
Bella, A. Z. S., & Pramudyastuti, O. L. (2023). Peran pengalaman kerja dan kompetensi auditor dalam pencegahan kecurangan. Akuntansiku, 2(3), 133–138.
Biksa, I. A. I., & Wiratmaja, I. D. N. (2016). Pengaruh pengalaman, independensi, skeptisme profesional auditor pada pendeteksian kecurangan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 17(3), 2384–2415.
Bowlin, K. O., Hobson, J. L., & Piercey, M. D. (2015). The effects of auditor rotation, professional skepticism, and interactions with managers on audit quality. The Accounting Review, 90(4), 1363–1393.
Brazel, J. F., Jackson, S. B., Schaefer, T. J., & Stewart, B. W. (2016). The outcome effect and professional skepticism. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1577–1599.
Budiartha, I. K. (2022). Skeptisme Profesional Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Kompleksitas Tugas Dan Tekanan Ketaatan Terhadap Audit JudgmenT.
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis multivariete dengan program IBM SPSS 23 (Edisi 8). Cetakan Ke VIII. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 96.
Hakami, T. A., Rahmat, M. M., Yaacob, M. H., & Saleh, N. M. (2020). Fraud Detection Gap between Auditor and Fraud Detection Models: Evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council. Asian Journal of Accounting & Governance, 13.
Halim, A. (2008). Auditing (Dasar-dasar audit laporan keuangan). Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.
Hartan, T. H., & Waluyo, I. (2016). Pengaruh skeptisme profesional, independensi dan kompetensi terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan (studi empiris pada inspektorat Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Jurnal Profita: Kajian Ilmu Akuntansi, 4(3).
Jayaraman, S., & Milbourn, T. (2015). CEO equity incentives and financial misreporting: The role of auditor expertise. The Accounting Review, 90(1), 321–350.
Lianitami, P. W., & Suprasto, B. (2016). Pengaruh Pemahaman Bisnis Klien, Pengalaman Audit dan Kompetensi Auditor pada Strategi Pendeteksian Kecurangan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 17(3), 2278–2297.
Mariyana, A. B., Simorangkir, P., & Putra, A. M. (2021). Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor, Independensi dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Fraud. Prosiding BIEMA (Business Management, Economic, and Accounting National Seminar), 2, 766–780.
Mui, G. Y. (2018). Defining auditor expertise in fraud detection. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 10(2), 168–186.
Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 1–14.
Permana, I., & Budiartha, I. K. (2022). Pengaruh Pengalaman Audit, Skeptisme, Intuisi, Dan Independensi Auditor Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 11(11), 1369–1383.
Pituringsih, E. (2019). Pengaruh Pengetahuan, Pengalaman, Skeptisme Profesional, dan Intuisi APIP Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pada Inspektorat Provinsi NTB Muhammad Idham1 Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Mataram, Indonesia. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(12), 3244–3258.
Pratiwi, V. T., & Widhiyani, N. L. S. (2017). Pengaruh profesionalisme, komitmen organisasi, etika profesi, dan pengalaman auditor pada tingkat pertimbangan materialitas. Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 19, 1463–1489.
Puspitasari, A., Baridwan, Z., & Rahman, A. F. (2019). The effect of audit competence, independence, and professional skeptism on audit quality with auditor’s ethics as moderation variables. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 18(5), 135–144.
Putra, G. S. A., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. B. (2019). The effect of auditor experience, type of personality and fraud auditing training on auditors ability in fraud detecting with professional skepticism as a mediation variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(2), 31–43.
Rafnes, M., & Primasari, N. H. (2020). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional, Pengalaman Auditor, Kompetensi Auditor Dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(1), 16–31.
Rahmawati, A., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pendeteksian Fraud: Kompetensi, Profesionalisme dan Pengalaman Audit (Literature Review Audit). Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 4(1), 60–68.
Sangkala, M. (2024). Concept and Application of Audit in Information Systems. Journal Of Management, Accounting, General Finance And International Economic Issues, 3(3), 730–741. https://doi.org/10.55047/marginal.v3i3.1193
Sari, K. G. A., Wirakusuma, M. G., & Ratnadi, N. M. D. (2018). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional, etika, tipe kepribadian, kompensasi, dan pengalaman pada pendeteksian kecurangan. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 7(1), 29–56.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif R&D. Alfabeta.
Sunardi, S., & Amin, M. N. (2018). Fraud detection of financial statement by using fraud diamond perspective. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(3), 878–891.
Susanto, H., Mulyani, S., Azis, H. A., & Sukmadilaga, C. (2019). The level of fraud detection affected by auditor competency using digital forensic support. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social, 5, 252–267.
Tang, J., & Karim, K. E. (2019). Financial fraud detection and big data analytics – implications on auditors’ use of fraud brainstorming session. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-01-2018-1767
Wahidahwati, W., & Asyik, N. F. (2022). Determinants of auditors ability in fraud detection. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2130165.
Wahyudi, G., & Qintharah, Y. N. (2023). Pengaruh Profesionalisme, Pengalaman, Risiko Audit, Dan Keahlian Audit Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan. Jurnal Penelitian Teori & Terapan Akuntansi (PETA), 8(1), 96–114.
Yuniarti, Y. (2018). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Beban Kerja, Gender Dan Kemampuan Investigatif Terhadap Pendeteksian Fraud Melalui Skeptisme Profesional Auditor. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Yusrianti, H. (2015). Pengaruh pengalaman audit, beban kerja, task specific knowledge terhadap pendeteksian kecurangan laporan keuangan (studi pada KAP di Sumatera Bagian Selatan). Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Sriwijaya, 13(1), 55–72.
Zamzami, F., Nusa, N. D., & Timur, R. P. (2016). The effectiveness of fraud prevention and detection methods at universities in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 66–69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ni Komang Ayu Devi, Ni Luh Sari Widhiyani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA).