Financial Management Strategies: Exploring the Nexus between Budget Allocation, Investment Policies, and Firm Performance

Authors

  • PA Andiena Nindya Putri ITB Stikom Bali, Bali, Indonesia
  • Upik Djaniar Universitas Muhammadiyah Kupang, Kupang, Indonesia
  • Ansir Launtu STIEM Bongaya Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Mutmainah STIE Al Anwar, mojokerto, Indonesia
  • Pandu Adi Cakranegara Universitas Presiden, Bekasi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v5i1.2397

Keywords:

Financial Management, Budget Allocation, Investment Policies, Firm Performance

Abstract

In the contemporary business landscape, effective financial management strategies play a pivotal role in determining the success and sustainability of firms. This article delves into the intricate relationship between budget allocation, investment policies, and firm performance. Budget allocation serves as a fundamental aspect of financial management, influencing resource distribution across various organizational functions. The efficacy of budget allocation strategies directly impacts the financial health and operational efficiency of firms. Moreover, investment policies represent critical decisions that shape the allocation of financial resources towards diverse investment avenues. The alignment between investment policies and organizational objectives is imperative for optimizing returns and mitigating risks. By examining the interplay between budget allocation and investment policies, this study aims to elucidate their combined impact on firm performance. Furthermore, firm performance serves as a comprehensive measure of organizational success, encompassing financial indicators, market position, and operational effectiveness. The integration of prudent budget allocation practices and strategic investment policies fosters sustainable growth and enhances competitive advantage, thereby augmenting overall firm performance. Through empirical analysis and theoretical frameworks, this article elucidates the synergistic relationship between budget allocation, investment policies, and firm performance. Insights derived from this study offer valuable implications for financial managers, policymakers, and stakeholders seeking to optimize financial management strategies in dynamic business environments.

References

Alqarni, K., Agina, M. F., Khairy, H. A., Al-Romeedy, B. S., Farrag, D. A., & Abdallah, R. M. (2023). The effect of electronic human resource management systems on sustainable competitive advantages: The roles of sustainable innovation and organizational agility. Sustainability, 15(23), 16382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316382

Ashari, H., & Nugrahanti, T. P. (2021). Household economy challenges in fulfilling life needs during the Covid-19 pandemic. Global Business and Economics Review, 25(1), 21-39. Retrieved from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. website.

Atobishi, T., Moh’d Abu Bakir, S., & Nosratabadi, S. (2024). How do digital capabilities affect organizational performance in the public sector? The mediating role of the organizational agility. Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14020037

Awad, A. L., Elkaffas, S. M., & Fakhr, M. W. (2023). Stock market prediction using deep reinforcement learning. Applied System Innovation, 6(6), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6060106

Bouzari, P., Gyenge, B., Ebrahimi, P., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2023). Problem solving and budget allocation of SMEs: Application of NCA approach. Computation, 11(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation11030048

Brandi, U., Collin, K., & Lemmetty, S. (2022). Sustainability perspectives in organizational and workplace learning studies. Sustainability, 14(20), 13101. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013101

Cho, Y. (2022). ESG and firm performance: Focusing on the environmental strategy. Sustainability, 14(13), 7857. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137857

Cupertino, S., Consolandi, C., & Vercelli, A. (2019). Corporate social performance, financialization, and real investment in US manufacturing firms. Sustainability, 11(7), 1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071836

Curmei-Semenescu, A., ?ilic?, E. V., & Curmei, C. V. (2021). Investors’ choices and strategic financial decisions of the companies. Evidence from an analysis of the capital budgeting policy implications on shares valuation. Sustainability, 13(8), 4112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084112

de Zarzà, I., de Curtò, J., Roig, G., & Calafate, C. T. (2024). Optimized financial planning: Integrating individual and cooperative budgeting models with LLM recommendations. AI, 5(1), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5010006

Dwikat, S. Y., Arshad, D., & Mohd Shariff, M. N. (2022). The influence of systematic strategic planning and strategic business innovation on the sustainable performance of manufacturing SMEs: The case of Palestine. Sustainability, 14(20), 13388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013388

Faulks, B., Song, Y., Waiganjo, M., Obrenovic, B., & Godinic, D. (2021). Impact of empowering leadership, innovative work, and organizational learning readiness on sustainable economic performance: An empirical study of companies in Russia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(22), 12465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212465

Fedchenko, E. A., Gusarova, L. V., Vasyunina, M. L., Lozhechko, A. S., & Lysenko, A. A. (2022). The mechanism of budget management as an element of risk control in regulatory authorities. Risks, 10(9), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10090177

Feng, X., & Goli, A. (2023). Enhancing business performance through circular economy: A comprehensive mathematical model and statistical analysis. Sustainability, 15(16), 12631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612631

Han, Y., Hua, M., Huang, M., Li, J., & Wang, S. (2022). Dynamic transition and convergence trend of the innovation efficiency among companies listed on the Growth Enterprise Market in the Yangtze River Economic Belt—Empirical analysis based on DEA—Malmquist model. Sustainability, 14(9), 5269. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095269

Horváthová, J., Mokrišová, M., & Vrábliková, M. (2021). Benchmarking—A way of finding risk factors in business performance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(5), 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14050221

Hsieh, C.-C., Chen, S.-L., & Huang, C.-C. (2023). Investigating the role of supply chain environmental risk in shaping the nexus of supply chain agility, resilience, and performance. Sustainability, 15(20), 15003. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015003

Jiménez, A., Arrieta, Y., Nuñez, M. A., & Villanueva, E. (2024). Management of strategic risks for the sustainability of SMEs in the manufacturing sector in Antioquia. Sustainability, 16(5), 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052094

Jucevi?ius, G., & Grumadait?, K. (2024). Managing strategic tensions in the development of organizational ecosystems. Sustainability, 16(5), 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051764

Kafetzopoulos, P., Psomas, E., & Katou, A. A. (2023). Promoting strategic flexibility and business performance through organizational ambidexterity. Sustainability, 15(17), 12997. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712997

Lee, C.-Y., Wen, C.-R., & Thi-Thanh-Nguyen, B. (2024). Board expertise background and firm performance. International Journal of Financial Studies, 12(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12010017

Lutfi, A., Alshira’h, A. F., Alshirah, M. H., Al-Okaily, M., Alqudah, H., Saad, M., ... Abdelmaksoud, O. (2022). Antecedents and impacts of enterprise resource planning system adoption among Jordanian SMEs. Sustainability, 14(6), 3508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063508

Mao, H., & Lu, J. (2023). Big data management capabilities and green innovation: A dynamic capabilities view. Sustainability, 15(19), 14637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914637

Mehmood, S., Fan, J., Dokota, I. S., Nazir, S., & Nazir, Z. (2024). How to manage supply chains successfully in transport infrastructure projects. Sustainability, 16(2), 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020730

Melina, Sukono, Napitupulu, H., & Mohamed, N. (2023). A conceptual model of investment-risk prediction in the stock market using extreme value theory with machine learning: A semisystematic literature review. Risks, 11(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11030060

Noja, G. G., Cristea, M., Jurcut, C. N., Buglea, A., & Lala Popa, I. (2020). Management financial incentives and firm performance in a sustainable development framework: Empirical evidence from European companies. Sustainability, 12(18), 7247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187247

Nugrahanti, T. P. (2023). Analyzing the evolution of auditing and financial insurance: Tracking developments, identifying research frontiers, and charting the future of accountability and risk management. *West Science Accounting and Finance, 1*(2), 59-68. Retrieved from https://wsj.westscience-press.com/index.php/wsaf

Ocoli?anu, A., Dobrot?, G., & Dobrot?, D. (2022). The effects of public investment on sustainable economic growth: Empirical evidence from emerging countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Sustainability, 14(14), 8721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148721

Putritamara, J. A., Hartono, B., Toiba, H., Utami, H. N., Rahman, M. S., & Masyithoh, D. (2023). Do dynamic capabilities and digital transformation improve business resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic? Insights from beekeeping MSMEs in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(3), 1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031760

Restrepo-Morales, J. A., Giraldo-Betancur, E. A., López-Cadavid, D. A., Grados-Vásquez, M. M., & Olórtiga-Cóndor, L. W. (2023). Enhanced organizational performance: Integrating dimensions for sustainable growth. Sustainability, 15(21), 15186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115186

Salah, A., Ça?lar, D., & Zoubi, K. (2023). The impact of production and operations management practices in improving organizational performance: The mediating role of supply chain integration. Sustainability, 15(20), 15140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015140

Salamah, E., Alzubi, A., & Yinal, A. (2024). Unveiling the impact of digitalization on supply chain performance in the post-COVID-19 era: The mediating role of supply chain integration and efficiency. Sustainability, 16(1), 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010304

Sun, Y., Zhao, L., & Lin, C. (2023). The impacts of executive equity on green corporate innovation. Sustainability, 15(13), 9887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139887

Tran, P. T. K., Ting, I. W. K., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, H. T. M. (2023). Determinants of management accounting application use in Vietnamese telecommunications companies: The moderating role of organisational culture. Sustainability, 15(19), 14419. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914419

Wu, H., Liao, W., Zhou, Z., & Li, Y. (2021). Can financial constraints and regulatory distance reduce corporate environmental irresponsibility? Sustainability, 13(23), 13243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313243

Downloads

Published

2024-03-17

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (March-April 2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 PA Andiena Nindya Putri, Upik Djaniar, Ansir Launtu, Mutmainah, Pandu Adi Cakranegara

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA).