Effectiveness of Kapsera Application on PT Trielang Jaya Maritiem

Authors

  • Luthfi Dhafira Pratama Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijdbm.v6i5.5557

Keywords:

KAPSERA, Compliance, Ship Waste Management, System Effectiveness, Environmental Awareness.

Abstract

This study is titled “The Effectiveness of the KAPSERA Application on Compliance and Waste Management Performance at PT Trielang Jaya Maritiem”. The background of this research arises from the issue of ship waste management that is still carried out manually, often leading to inaccuracies and low compliance with maritime regulations. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of KAPSERA in improving waste reasonableness evaluation, enhancing crew knowledge and awareness, and its impact on compliance and waste management performance. The research employed a Research and Development (R&D) method with a mixed methods approach, involving questionnaires, interviews, observations, and system testing. Data analysis was conducted using SmartPLS to examine validity, reliability, and inter-variable relationships. The results show that the effectiveness of waste evaluation (X1) does not significantly affect compliance (Y), whereas crew knowledge and awareness (X2) have a significant positive effect on Y. These findings indicate that educational aspects are more influential in driving compliance than technical system aspects. In conclusion, KAPSERA is effective as an educational and awareness-enhancing tool, while improvements in technical evaluation features are still required to fully support operational performance

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik transportasi dan pergudangan. Jakarta: BPS.

Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2020). A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2142–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1708989

Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Laut. (2024). Data jumlah kapal niaga yang beroperasi di Indonesia. Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia.

Carpenter, A., & Macgill, S. (2005). The EU directive on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues: The results of a second survey on the provision and uptake of facilities in North Sea ports. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50(12), 1541–1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.041

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2016). Information systems success measurement. Foundations and Trends in Information Systems, 2(1), 1–116. https://doi.org/10.1561/2900000005

Di Vaio, A., & Varriale, L. (2020). Digitalization in the sea freight shipping industry: An empirical study on shipowners. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(5), 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1718617

Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R., Alvino, F., & Palladino, R. (2020). Maritime digitalization and sustainable governance: Emerging technologies for environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 1793–1806. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2478

EMSA. (2020). Guidance on best practices for waste management in ships. European Maritime Safety Agency.

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

Hänninen, M., & Sassi, J. (2020). Developing maritime waste management practices: Case studies from the Baltic Sea. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 19(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-020-00208-3

IMO - International Maritime Organization. (2020). Prevention of Pollution by Garbage from Ships - MARPOL Annex V. Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/garbage-default.aspx

IMO. (2017). Resolution MEPC.295(71) - 2017 Guidelines for the Implementation of MARPOL Annex V. Retrieved from

https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.295(71).pdf

Kitada, M., & Ölçer, A. I. (2015). Managing barriers to environmental improvement in maritime transport: From the perspective of ship officers and shore managers. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 97(1–2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.020

Kitada, M., Ölçer, A. I., & Ballini, F. (2018). Governance challenges of implementing MARPOL Annex VI. Marine Policy, 87, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.030

Mansoor, A., & Sinha, S. (2019). Compliance with MARPOL Annex V: Challenges for developing countries. Marine Policy, 103, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.01.004

Munim, Z. H., & Schramm, H. J. (2018). The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on trade and maritime transport. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 20(4), 530–556. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-017-0072-0

Prajogo, D., Toy, J., Bhattacharya, A., Oke, A., & Cheng, T. (2018). The relationships between information management, process management and operational performance. International Journal of Production Research, 56(18), 5870–5881. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1464233

Putra, I. M. A., Sari, N. M., & Mahardika, I. G. (2020). Marine environmental protection in Indonesia: A regulatory perspective. Marine Policy, 113, 103799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103799

REMPEC. (2020). Guidelines on cargo-related waste management. Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the Mediterranean Sea.

Stopford, M. (2020). Maritime economics (4th ed.). Routledge.

Yadav, S., Singh, S., & Raut, R. D. (2021). Adoption of digital platforms in maritime logistics: A socio-technical perspective. Technology in Society, 67, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101716

Yulianto, I., Wahyudi, R., & Pratama, H. (2021). The implementation of integrated port waste management systems in Indonesia. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 20(3), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-021-00240-8

Downloads

Published

2025-09-18