MOTIVATION ANALYSIS OF CROWDFUNDING DONATION BASED DISCLOSURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31933/dijdbm.v1i2.158Keywords:
Online Donation Crowdfunding, Signal Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Self Enlightened Interest, Genuine Accountability, DisclosureAbstract
This study aimed to understand the degree of accountability related to disclosure of online donation crowdfunding report and provide some recommendation for adequate disclosure of crowdfunding online donation from stakeholder. This study is motivated by the fact that cyber scam of online donation increased and absence spesific regulation about donation crowdfunding from regulator to mitigate. Signaling theory and stakeholder theory are applied in this study. Two different approaches to asses motivation of online donation crowdfunding disclosure, such as the self enlightened interest consider as ethical business and genuine accountability as mandatory business. Kitabisa.com choosen as single unit analysis for this study. This study employ mixed method with content and thematic analysis processed by Nvivo 12 pro. It is found that self enlightened interest still dominant and play important role in Kitabisa.com disclosure report. Recommendations for disclosure from donors to answer where is their money go such as campaign detail description, publication or clarification, campaign detail financial report, time limit for disclose campaign report, recap or plan for funding utilization, interaction between donors and campaigner and add visual document to reduce assymetri information and strength stakeholder engagement
References
Ahlers, G. K. C., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
Althoff, T., & Leskovec, J. (2015). Donor retention in online crowdfunding communities: A case study of DonorsChoose.org. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 34–44). https://doi.org/10.1145/2736277.2741120
Azizah, Rizka. (2016, Agustus 30).Hati Hati, modus penipuan berkedok donasi. https://www.femina.co.id/trending-topic/hati-hati-modus-penipuan-berkedok-donasi. Diakses tanggal 10 April 2019.
Beaulieu, T., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2015). A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Crowdfunding. Cais, 37(June), 1.
Becker, A. (2018). An experimental study of voluntary nonprofit accountability and effects on public trust, reputation, perceived quality, and donation behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018756200
Bekkers, R. (2003). Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764003258102
Bougie & Sekaran. (2013). Research Methods for Business: A skill Building Approach.New York : John wiley@Sons
Block, J., Hornuf, L., & Moritz, A. (2018). Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation? Small Business Economics, 50(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9876-4
Chiu, T. K., & Wang, Y. H. (2014). Determinants of social disclosure quality in taiwan: an application of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2160-5
Colasanti, N., Frondizi, R., & Meneguzzo, M. (2018). Higher education and stakeholders’ donations: successful civic crowdfunding in an Italian university. Public Money and Management, 38(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1449471
Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2016). Resolving nformation asymmetry: signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267
Elijido-ten, E. (2004). Determinants of environmental disclosures in a developing country: an application of the stakeholder theory. In Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference (pp. 1–28).
Gregorian, Dareh. (2018,November 16).Arrest in GoFundMe homeless good samaritan scam show perils of crowdfunding. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/arrests-gofundme-homeless-good-samaritan-scam-show-perils-crowdfunding-n936941. Diakses tanggal 05September 2018.
Hamidi.(2004). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif : Aplikasi Praktis Pembuatan Proposal dan Laporan Penelitian. Malang:UMM Press
Heikkinen, A., Kujala, J., & Inha, M. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in a non-profit organisation : an issue-based perspective. Int. J. Human Resources Development and Management, 19(1), 5–20.
Huang, C. L., & Kung, F. H. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0476-3
Kim, J., Newberry, P., & Qiu, C. (2018). The role of information signals in determining crowdfunding outcomes. In Digital economic conference (pp. 23–51).
Kim, P. H., Buffart, M., & Croidieu, G. (2016). TMI: signaling credible claims in crowdfunding campaign narratives. Group and Organization Management, 41(6), 717–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116651181
Kusumawati, Dewi.(2017).Pengaruh stakeholder engagement terhadap pengungkapan sustainability report berdasarkan global reporting intiative (GRI) G4 (Studi empiris pada perusahaan non-Keuangan yang terdapat di BEI tahun 2013-2015. Fakultas ekonomi dan Bisnis. Universitas Lampung. Lampung
Li, X., Tang, Y., Yang, N., Ren, R., Zheng, H., & Zhou, H. (2016). The value of information disclosure and lead investor in equity-based crowdfunding. Nankai Business Review International, 7(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-01-2016-0002
Moleskis, M., Alegre, I., & Canela, M. A. (2018). Crowdfunding entrepreneurial or humanitarian needs? the influence of signals and biases on decisions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(3), 552–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018802367
Novitasari, Sisilia Claudea. (2017,Mei 05). Cerita Cak Budi Buka-bukaan soal aksinya pakai uang donasi. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20170505002637-20-212420/cerita-cak-budi-buka-bukaan-soal-aksinya-pakai-uang-donasi. Diakses tanggal 01 Januari 2019
O’Neil, J. (2007). The link between strong public relationships and donor support. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.021
Paschen, J. (2017). Choose wisely: crowdfunding through the stages of the startup life cycle. Business Horizons, 60(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.11.003
Rahardjo, Mundjia. (2010). Triangulasi dalam penelitian kualitatif.http://mudjiarahardjo.com/artikel/270.html?task=view.Diakses tanggal 10 Agustus 2018
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K
Saerang,David & Pontoh Winston.(2011). Analisis pengaruh tingkat pengembalian aktiva terhadap harga saham perusahaan di bursa efek indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing,3(1),3-17. ISSN. 2088-8899
Shauki, E.R.,(2018) Research instruments in case study and the role of researcher.Handout, Case Writing and methodology, ECAM 809303. Universitas Indonesia
Shauki, E. (2011). Is this a case of self-enlightened interst or genuine accountability : a study on different reporting media in the australian retail industry, 2(December), 51–76.
Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal OfEconomics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820924
Sugiyono.(2010).Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Symantec (2016, April 21).Internet Security Threat Report.April 21.2016. https://www.symantec.com/content/dam/symantec/docs/reports/istr-21-2016-en
Sulaeman, D., & Lin, M. (2018). Reducing uncertainty in charitable crowdfunding reducing uncertainty in charitable crowdfunding. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) (p. 134).
Valančienė, L., & Jegelevičiūtė, S. (2014). Crowdfunding for creating value: stakeholder approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156(April), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.248
van der Laan Smith, J., Adhikari, A., & Tondkar, R. H. (2005). Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(2), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.12.007
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research Design Methods (Third Edit). London: Sage Publication.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management (DIJDBM) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management (DIJDBM).
