MOTIVATION ANALYSIS OF CROWDFUNDING DONATION BASED DISCLOSURE

Main Article Content

Ruli Bestari

Abstract

This study aimed to understand the degree of accountability related to disclosure of  online donation crowdfunding report and provide some recommendation for adequate disclosure of crowdfunding online donation from stakeholder. This study is motivated by the fact that cyber scam of online donation increased and absence spesific regulation about donation crowdfunding from regulator to mitigate. Signaling theory and stakeholder theory are applied in this study. Two different approaches to asses motivation of online donation crowdfunding disclosure, such as the self enlightened interest consider as ethical business and genuine accountability as mandatory business. Kitabisa.com choosen as single unit analysis for this study. This study employ mixed method with content and thematic analysis processed by Nvivo 12 pro. It is found that self enlightened interest still dominant and play important role in Kitabisa.com disclosure report. Recommendations for disclosure from donors to answer where is their money go such as campaign detail description,  publication or clarification, campaign detail financial report, time limit for disclose campaign report, recap or plan for funding utilization, interaction between donors and campaigner and add visual document to reduce assymetri information and strength stakeholder engagement

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Ahlers, G. K. C., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157

Althoff, T., & Leskovec, J. (2015). Donor retention in online crowdfunding communities: A case study of DonorsChoose.org. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 34–44). https://doi.org/10.1145/2736277.2741120

Azizah, Rizka. (2016, Agustus 30).Hati Hati, modus penipuan berkedok donasi. https://www.femina.co.id/trending-topic/hati-hati-modus-penipuan-berkedok-donasi. Diakses tanggal 10 April 2019.

Beaulieu, T., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2015). A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Crowdfunding. Cais, 37(June), 1.

Becker, A. (2018). An experimental study of voluntary nonprofit accountability and effects on public trust, reputation, perceived quality, and donation behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018756200

Bekkers, R. (2003). Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764003258102

Bougie & Sekaran. (2013). Research Methods for Business: A skill Building Approach.New York : John wiley@Sons

Block, J., Hornuf, L., & Moritz, A. (2018). Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation? Small Business Economics, 50(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9876-4

Chiu, T. K., & Wang, Y. H. (2014). Determinants of social disclosure quality in taiwan: an application of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2160-5

Colasanti, N., Frondizi, R., & Meneguzzo, M. (2018). Higher education and stakeholders’ donations: successful civic crowdfunding in an Italian university. Public Money and Management, 38(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1449471

Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2016). Resolving nformation asymmetry: signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267

Elijido-ten, E. (2004). Determinants of environmental disclosures in a developing country: an application of the stakeholder theory. In Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference (pp. 1–28).

Gregorian, Dareh. (2018,November 16).Arrest in GoFundMe homeless good samaritan scam show perils of crowdfunding. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/arrests-gofundme-homeless-good-samaritan-scam-show-perils-crowdfunding-n936941. Diakses tanggal 05September 2018.

Hamidi.(2004). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif : Aplikasi Praktis Pembuatan Proposal dan Laporan Penelitian. Malang:UMM Press

Heikkinen, A., Kujala, J., & Inha, M. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in a non-profit organisation : an issue-based perspective. Int. J. Human Resources Development and Management, 19(1), 5–20.

Huang, C. L., & Kung, F. H. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0476-3

Kim, J., Newberry, P., & Qiu, C. (2018). The role of information signals in determining crowdfunding outcomes. In Digital economic conference (pp. 23–51).

Kim, P. H., Buffart, M., & Croidieu, G. (2016). TMI: signaling credible claims in crowdfunding campaign narratives. Group and Organization Management, 41(6), 717–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116651181

Kusumawati, Dewi.(2017).Pengaruh stakeholder engagement terhadap pengungkapan sustainability report berdasarkan global reporting intiative (GRI) G4 (Studi empiris pada perusahaan non-Keuangan yang terdapat di BEI tahun 2013-2015. Fakultas ekonomi dan Bisnis. Universitas Lampung. Lampung

Li, X., Tang, Y., Yang, N., Ren, R., Zheng, H., & Zhou, H. (2016). The value of information disclosure and lead investor in equity-based crowdfunding. Nankai Business Review International, 7(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-01-2016-0002

Moleskis, M., Alegre, I., & Canela, M. A. (2018). Crowdfunding entrepreneurial or humanitarian needs? the influence of signals and biases on decisions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(3), 552–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018802367

Novitasari, Sisilia Claudea. (2017,Mei 05). Cerita Cak Budi Buka-bukaan soal aksinya pakai uang donasi. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20170505002637-20-212420/cerita-cak-budi-buka-bukaan-soal-aksinya-pakai-uang-donasi. Diakses tanggal 01 Januari 2019

O’Neil, J. (2007). The link between strong public relationships and donor support. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.021

Paschen, J. (2017). Choose wisely: crowdfunding through the stages of the startup life cycle. Business Horizons, 60(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.11.003

Rahardjo, Mundjia. (2010). Triangulasi dalam penelitian kualitatif.http://mudjiarahardjo.com/artikel/270.html?task=view.Diakses tanggal 10 Agustus 2018

Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K

Saerang,David & Pontoh Winston.(2011). Analisis pengaruh tingkat pengembalian aktiva terhadap harga saham perusahaan di bursa efek indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing,3(1),3-17. ISSN. 2088-8899

Shauki, E.R.,(2018) Research instruments in case study and the role of researcher.Handout, Case Writing and methodology, ECAM 809303. Universitas Indonesia

Shauki, E. (2011). Is this a case of self-enlightened interst or genuine accountability : a study on different reporting media in the australian retail industry, 2(December), 51–76.

Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal OfEconomics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820924

Sugiyono.(2010).Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Symantec (2016, April 21).Internet Security Threat Report.April 21.2016. https://www.symantec.com/content/dam/symantec/docs/reports/istr-21-2016-en

Sulaeman, D., & Lin, M. (2018). Reducing uncertainty in charitable crowdfunding reducing uncertainty in charitable crowdfunding. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) (p. 134).

Valančienė, L., & Jegelevičiūtė, S. (2014). Crowdfunding for creating value: stakeholder approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156(April), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.248

van der Laan Smith, J., Adhikari, A., & Tondkar, R. H. (2005). Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(2), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.12.007

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research Design Methods (Third Edit). London: Sage Publication.